Comparison of DNA Fingerprinting Methods for Use in Investigation of Type E Botulism Outbreaks in the Canadian Arctic

Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, and automated ribotyping were compared for epidemiological typing of Clostridium botulinum type E using clinical and food isolates associated with four botulism outbreaks occurring in the Canadian Arctic. Al...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Clinical Microbiology
Main Authors: Leclair, Daniel, Pagotto, Franco, Farber, Jeffrey M., Cadieux, Brigitte, Austin, John W.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: American Society for Microbiology 2006
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1479196
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16672387
https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.5.1635-1644.2006
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:1479196
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:1479196 2023-05-15T14:57:21+02:00 Comparison of DNA Fingerprinting Methods for Use in Investigation of Type E Botulism Outbreaks in the Canadian Arctic Leclair, Daniel Pagotto, Franco Farber, Jeffrey M. Cadieux, Brigitte Austin, John W. 2006-05 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1479196 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16672387 https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.5.1635-1644.2006 en eng American Society for Microbiology http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1479196 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16672387 http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.5.1635-1644.2006 Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology Epidemiology Text 2006 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.5.1635-1644.2006 2013-08-31T02:21:01Z Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, and automated ribotyping were compared for epidemiological typing of Clostridium botulinum type E using clinical and food isolates associated with four botulism outbreaks occurring in the Canadian Arctic. All type E strains previously untypeable by PFGE, even with the use of a formaldehyde fixation step, could be typed by the addition of 50 μM thiourea to the electrophoresis running buffer. Digestion with SmaI or XhoI followed by PFGE was used to link food and clinical isolates from four different type E botulism outbreaks and differentiate them from among 39 group II strains. Strain differentiation was unsuccessful with the automated ribotyping system, producing a single characteristic EcoRI fingerprint common to all group II strains. RAPD analysis of C. botulinum group II strains was not consistently reproducible with primer OPJ-6 or OPJ-13, apparently discriminating between epidemiologically related strains. A modified PFGE protocol was judged to be the most useful method for typing epidemiologically related C. botulinum type E strains, based on its ability to type all strains reproducibly and with an adequate level of discrimination. Text Arctic PubMed Central (PMC) Arctic Journal of Clinical Microbiology 44 5 1635 1644
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Epidemiology
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Leclair, Daniel
Pagotto, Franco
Farber, Jeffrey M.
Cadieux, Brigitte
Austin, John W.
Comparison of DNA Fingerprinting Methods for Use in Investigation of Type E Botulism Outbreaks in the Canadian Arctic
topic_facet Epidemiology
description Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis, and automated ribotyping were compared for epidemiological typing of Clostridium botulinum type E using clinical and food isolates associated with four botulism outbreaks occurring in the Canadian Arctic. All type E strains previously untypeable by PFGE, even with the use of a formaldehyde fixation step, could be typed by the addition of 50 μM thiourea to the electrophoresis running buffer. Digestion with SmaI or XhoI followed by PFGE was used to link food and clinical isolates from four different type E botulism outbreaks and differentiate them from among 39 group II strains. Strain differentiation was unsuccessful with the automated ribotyping system, producing a single characteristic EcoRI fingerprint common to all group II strains. RAPD analysis of C. botulinum group II strains was not consistently reproducible with primer OPJ-6 or OPJ-13, apparently discriminating between epidemiologically related strains. A modified PFGE protocol was judged to be the most useful method for typing epidemiologically related C. botulinum type E strains, based on its ability to type all strains reproducibly and with an adequate level of discrimination.
format Text
author Leclair, Daniel
Pagotto, Franco
Farber, Jeffrey M.
Cadieux, Brigitte
Austin, John W.
author_facet Leclair, Daniel
Pagotto, Franco
Farber, Jeffrey M.
Cadieux, Brigitte
Austin, John W.
author_sort Leclair, Daniel
title Comparison of DNA Fingerprinting Methods for Use in Investigation of Type E Botulism Outbreaks in the Canadian Arctic
title_short Comparison of DNA Fingerprinting Methods for Use in Investigation of Type E Botulism Outbreaks in the Canadian Arctic
title_full Comparison of DNA Fingerprinting Methods for Use in Investigation of Type E Botulism Outbreaks in the Canadian Arctic
title_fullStr Comparison of DNA Fingerprinting Methods for Use in Investigation of Type E Botulism Outbreaks in the Canadian Arctic
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of DNA Fingerprinting Methods for Use in Investigation of Type E Botulism Outbreaks in the Canadian Arctic
title_sort comparison of dna fingerprinting methods for use in investigation of type e botulism outbreaks in the canadian arctic
publisher American Society for Microbiology
publishDate 2006
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1479196
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16672387
https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.5.1635-1644.2006
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1479196
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16672387
http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.5.1635-1644.2006
op_rights Copyright © 2006, American Society for Microbiology
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.44.5.1635-1644.2006
container_title Journal of Clinical Microbiology
container_volume 44
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1635
op_container_end_page 1644
_version_ 1766329427856195584