Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves

Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other p...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Royal Society Open Science
Main Authors: Konno, Akitsugu, Aoki, Hitomi, Suzuki, Emiri, Furuta, Seiya, Ueda, Sayoko
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: The Royal Society 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10731317/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38126061
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230854
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:10731317
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:10731317 2024-01-21T10:05:21+01:00 Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves Konno, Akitsugu Aoki, Hitomi Suzuki, Emiri Furuta, Seiya Ueda, Sayoko 2023-12-20 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10731317/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38126061 https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230854 en eng The Royal Society http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10731317/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38126061 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230854 © 2023 The Authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited. R Soc Open Sci Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience Text 2023 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230854 2023-12-24T02:05:13Z Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (Canis lupus), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans. Text Canis lupus PubMed Central (PMC) Royal Society Open Science 10 12
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
spellingShingle Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
Konno, Akitsugu
Aoki, Hitomi
Suzuki, Emiri
Furuta, Seiya
Ueda, Sayoko
Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves
topic_facet Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience
description Comparative studies have shown that the eye morphology of primates has been shaped by a variety of selection pressures (e.g. communication, environmental factors). To comprehensively elucidate the complex links between ocular morphology and its evolutionary drive, attention should be paid to other phylogenetic groups. Here, we address a new question regarding the evolution of eye colour patterns in the oldest domesticated animal, namely, the domestic dog (Canis familiaris). In this study, we conducted an image analysis of dogs and their closest relatives, grey wolves (Canis lupus), to compare the colours of their irises, with the aim of assessing whether eye colours of dogs affect how humans perceived dogs. We found that the irises of dogs were significantly darker than those of wolves. We also found that facial images of dark-eyed dogs were perceived as more friendly and immature, potentially eliciting caregiving responses from humans. Our findings are consistent with our expectation that humans favour dark-eyed dogs over light-eyed ones and provide an updated hypothesis that dogs with dark eyes may have evolved by acquiring a facial trait that sends a non-threatening gaze signal to humans.
format Text
author Konno, Akitsugu
Aoki, Hitomi
Suzuki, Emiri
Furuta, Seiya
Ueda, Sayoko
author_facet Konno, Akitsugu
Aoki, Hitomi
Suzuki, Emiri
Furuta, Seiya
Ueda, Sayoko
author_sort Konno, Akitsugu
title Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves
title_short Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves
title_full Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves
title_fullStr Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves
title_full_unstemmed Are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? Domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves
title_sort are dark-eyed dogs favoured by humans? domestication as a potential driver of iris colour difference between dogs and wolves
publisher The Royal Society
publishDate 2023
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10731317/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38126061
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230854
genre Canis lupus
genre_facet Canis lupus
op_source R Soc Open Sci
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10731317/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38126061
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230854
op_rights © 2023 The Authors.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230854
container_title Royal Society Open Science
container_volume 10
container_issue 12
_version_ 1788695786709581824