Contrasting Torpor Use by Reproductive Male Common Noctule Bats in the Laboratory and in the Field

Metabolic processes of animals are often studied in controlled laboratory settings. However, these laboratory settings often do not reflect the animals’ natural environment. Thus, results of metabolic measurements from laboratory studies must be cautiously applied to free-ranging animals. Recent tec...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Integrative And Comparative Biology
Main Authors: Keicher, Lara, Shipley, J Ryan, Schaeffer, Paul J, Dechmann, Dina K N
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Oxford University Press 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10714913/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237444
https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icad040
_version_ 1821670580033683456
author Keicher, Lara
Shipley, J Ryan
Schaeffer, Paul J
Dechmann, Dina K N
author_facet Keicher, Lara
Shipley, J Ryan
Schaeffer, Paul J
Dechmann, Dina K N
author_sort Keicher, Lara
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1087
container_title Integrative And Comparative Biology
container_volume 63
description Metabolic processes of animals are often studied in controlled laboratory settings. However, these laboratory settings often do not reflect the animals’ natural environment. Thus, results of metabolic measurements from laboratory studies must be cautiously applied to free-ranging animals. Recent technological advances in animal tracking allow detailed eco-physiological studies that reveal when, where, and how physiological measurements from the field differ from those from the laboratory. We investigated the torpor behavior of male common noctule bats (Nyctalus noctula) across different life history stages using two approaches: in controlled laboratory experiments and in the field using calibrated heart rate telemetry. We predicted that non-reproductive males would extensively use torpor to conserve energy, whereas reproductive males would reduce torpor use to promote spermatogenesis. We did not expect differences in torpor use between captive and wild animals as we simulated natural temperature conditions in the laboratory. We found that during the non-reproductive phase, both captive and free-ranging bats used torpor extensively. During reproduction, bats in captivity unexpectedly also used torpor throughout the day, while only free-ranging bats showed the expected reduction in torpor use. Thus, depending on life history stage, torpor behavior in the laboratory was markedly different from the wild. By implementing both approaches and at different life history stages, we were able to better explore the limitations of eco-physiological laboratory studies and make recommendations for when they are an appropriate proxy for natural behavior.
format Text
genre Nyctalus noctula
genre_facet Nyctalus noctula
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:10714913
institution Open Polar
language English
op_collection_id ftpubmed
op_container_end_page 1098
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icad040
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10714913/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237444
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/icad040
op_rights © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology.
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
op_source Integr Comp Biol
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:10714913 2025-01-17T00:01:38+00:00 Contrasting Torpor Use by Reproductive Male Common Noctule Bats in the Laboratory and in the Field Keicher, Lara Shipley, J Ryan Schaeffer, Paul J Dechmann, Dina K N 2023-05-26 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10714913/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237444 https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icad040 en eng Oxford University Press http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10714913/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237444 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icb/icad040 © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Integrative and Comparative Biology. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Integr Comp Biol Symposium Text 2023 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icad040 2023-12-17T01:56:42Z Metabolic processes of animals are often studied in controlled laboratory settings. However, these laboratory settings often do not reflect the animals’ natural environment. Thus, results of metabolic measurements from laboratory studies must be cautiously applied to free-ranging animals. Recent technological advances in animal tracking allow detailed eco-physiological studies that reveal when, where, and how physiological measurements from the field differ from those from the laboratory. We investigated the torpor behavior of male common noctule bats (Nyctalus noctula) across different life history stages using two approaches: in controlled laboratory experiments and in the field using calibrated heart rate telemetry. We predicted that non-reproductive males would extensively use torpor to conserve energy, whereas reproductive males would reduce torpor use to promote spermatogenesis. We did not expect differences in torpor use between captive and wild animals as we simulated natural temperature conditions in the laboratory. We found that during the non-reproductive phase, both captive and free-ranging bats used torpor extensively. During reproduction, bats in captivity unexpectedly also used torpor throughout the day, while only free-ranging bats showed the expected reduction in torpor use. Thus, depending on life history stage, torpor behavior in the laboratory was markedly different from the wild. By implementing both approaches and at different life history stages, we were able to better explore the limitations of eco-physiological laboratory studies and make recommendations for when they are an appropriate proxy for natural behavior. Text Nyctalus noctula PubMed Central (PMC) Integrative And Comparative Biology 63 5 1087 1098
spellingShingle Symposium
Keicher, Lara
Shipley, J Ryan
Schaeffer, Paul J
Dechmann, Dina K N
Contrasting Torpor Use by Reproductive Male Common Noctule Bats in the Laboratory and in the Field
title Contrasting Torpor Use by Reproductive Male Common Noctule Bats in the Laboratory and in the Field
title_full Contrasting Torpor Use by Reproductive Male Common Noctule Bats in the Laboratory and in the Field
title_fullStr Contrasting Torpor Use by Reproductive Male Common Noctule Bats in the Laboratory and in the Field
title_full_unstemmed Contrasting Torpor Use by Reproductive Male Common Noctule Bats in the Laboratory and in the Field
title_short Contrasting Torpor Use by Reproductive Male Common Noctule Bats in the Laboratory and in the Field
title_sort contrasting torpor use by reproductive male common noctule bats in the laboratory and in the field
topic Symposium
topic_facet Symposium
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10714913/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37237444
https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icad040