The relative importance of abiotic and biotic environmental conditions for taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spiders across spatial scales

Both abiotic and biotic conditions may be important for biodiversity. However, their relative importance may vary among different diversity dimensions as well as across spatial scales. Spiders (Araneae) offer an ecologically relevant system for evaluating variation in the relative strength abiotic a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Oecologia
Main Authors: Måsviken, Johannes, Dalén, Love, Norén, Karin, Dalerum, Fredrik
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10307692/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261510
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05383-0
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:10307692
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:10307692 2023-07-23T04:21:01+02:00 The relative importance of abiotic and biotic environmental conditions for taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spiders across spatial scales Måsviken, Johannes Dalén, Love Norén, Karin Dalerum, Fredrik 2023-06-01 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10307692/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261510 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05383-0 en eng Springer Berlin Heidelberg http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10307692/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261510 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05383-0 © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . Oecologia Original Research Text 2023 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05383-0 2023-07-02T01:31:40Z Both abiotic and biotic conditions may be important for biodiversity. However, their relative importance may vary among different diversity dimensions as well as across spatial scales. Spiders (Araneae) offer an ecologically relevant system for evaluating variation in the relative strength abiotic and biotic biodiversity regulation. We quantified the relative importance of abiotic and biotic conditions for three diversity dimensions of spider communities quantified across two spatial scales. Spiders were surveyed along elevation gradients in northern Sweden. We focused our analysis on geomorphological and climatic conditions as well as vegetation characteristics, and quantified the relative importance of these conditions for the taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spider communities sampled across one intermediate (500 m) and one local (25 m) scale. There were stronger relationships among diversity dimensions at the local than the intermediate scale. There were also variation in the relative influence of abiotic and biotic conditions among diversity dimensions, but this variation was not consistent across spatial scales. Across both spatial scales, vegetation was related to all diversity dimensions whereas climate was important for phylogenetic and functional diversity. Our study does not fully support stronger abiotic regulation at coarser scales, and conversely stronger abiotic regulation at more local scales. Instead, our results indicate that community assembly is shaped by interactions between abiotic constrains in species distributions and biotic conditions, and that such interactions may be both scale and context dependent. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-023-05383-0. Text Northern Sweden PubMed Central (PMC) Oecologia 202 2 261 273
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Original Research
spellingShingle Original Research
Måsviken, Johannes
Dalén, Love
Norén, Karin
Dalerum, Fredrik
The relative importance of abiotic and biotic environmental conditions for taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spiders across spatial scales
topic_facet Original Research
description Both abiotic and biotic conditions may be important for biodiversity. However, their relative importance may vary among different diversity dimensions as well as across spatial scales. Spiders (Araneae) offer an ecologically relevant system for evaluating variation in the relative strength abiotic and biotic biodiversity regulation. We quantified the relative importance of abiotic and biotic conditions for three diversity dimensions of spider communities quantified across two spatial scales. Spiders were surveyed along elevation gradients in northern Sweden. We focused our analysis on geomorphological and climatic conditions as well as vegetation characteristics, and quantified the relative importance of these conditions for the taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spider communities sampled across one intermediate (500 m) and one local (25 m) scale. There were stronger relationships among diversity dimensions at the local than the intermediate scale. There were also variation in the relative influence of abiotic and biotic conditions among diversity dimensions, but this variation was not consistent across spatial scales. Across both spatial scales, vegetation was related to all diversity dimensions whereas climate was important for phylogenetic and functional diversity. Our study does not fully support stronger abiotic regulation at coarser scales, and conversely stronger abiotic regulation at more local scales. Instead, our results indicate that community assembly is shaped by interactions between abiotic constrains in species distributions and biotic conditions, and that such interactions may be both scale and context dependent. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00442-023-05383-0.
format Text
author Måsviken, Johannes
Dalén, Love
Norén, Karin
Dalerum, Fredrik
author_facet Måsviken, Johannes
Dalén, Love
Norén, Karin
Dalerum, Fredrik
author_sort Måsviken, Johannes
title The relative importance of abiotic and biotic environmental conditions for taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spiders across spatial scales
title_short The relative importance of abiotic and biotic environmental conditions for taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spiders across spatial scales
title_full The relative importance of abiotic and biotic environmental conditions for taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spiders across spatial scales
title_fullStr The relative importance of abiotic and biotic environmental conditions for taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spiders across spatial scales
title_full_unstemmed The relative importance of abiotic and biotic environmental conditions for taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spiders across spatial scales
title_sort relative importance of abiotic and biotic environmental conditions for taxonomic, phylogenetic, and functional diversity of spiders across spatial scales
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
publishDate 2023
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10307692/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261510
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05383-0
genre Northern Sweden
genre_facet Northern Sweden
op_source Oecologia
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10307692/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37261510
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05383-0
op_rights © The Author(s) 2023
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-023-05383-0
container_title Oecologia
container_volume 202
container_issue 2
container_start_page 261
op_container_end_page 273
_version_ 1772186133109669888