Psychometric testing of the Swedish version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP)

BACKGROUND: Moral distress has been described as moral constraints and uncertainty connected with guilty feelings of being unable to give care in accordance with one’s values for good care. Various instruments to measure moral distress have been developed. The instrument measure of moral distress fo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:BMC Medical Ethics
Main Authors: Fischer-Grönlund, Catarina, Brännström, Margareta, Isaksson, Ulf
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: BioMed Central 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228011/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37254086
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00916-x
id ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:10228011
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubmed:oai:pubmedcentral.nih.gov:10228011 2023-06-18T03:42:18+02:00 Psychometric testing of the Swedish version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP) Fischer-Grönlund, Catarina Brännström, Margareta Isaksson, Ulf 2023-05-30 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228011/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37254086 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00916-x en eng BioMed Central http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228011/ http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37254086 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00916-x © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. BMC Med Ethics Research Text 2023 ftpubmed https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00916-x 2023-06-04T01:21:17Z BACKGROUND: Moral distress has been described as moral constraints and uncertainty connected with guilty feelings of being unable to give care in accordance with one’s values for good care. Various instruments to measure moral distress have been developed. The instrument measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP) was developed to capture the experience and frequency of moral distress among various healthcare professionals. The MMD-HP has been translated and culturally adapted into the Swedish language and context; however, the translation has not been validated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP). METHODS: Eighty-nine staff from various professions at a hospital in northern Sweden participated in the study. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed to check for consistency with the original version of the MMD-HP. To evaluate internal consistency, Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for each domain and for the scale as a whole. RESULTS: The scale as a whole showed a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.96, with a range between 0.84 and 0.90 between the different subscales. A confirmatory factor analysis based on the original four-factor structure showed good fit indices with a χ(2)/df of 0.67, CFI at 1.00, TLI at 1.02 and NFI at 0.97. RMSEA was at 0.00, and SRMR was at 0.08. A comparison of the total score between three equally large groups of years of experience at the present workplace showed no significant differences (F = 0.09, df = 2, p = 0.912). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the Swedish version of the MMD-HP has shown validity and reliability for use in a Swedish context for measuring moral distress among health personnel. Text Northern Sweden PubMed Central (PMC) BMC Medical Ethics 24 1
institution Open Polar
collection PubMed Central (PMC)
op_collection_id ftpubmed
language English
topic Research
spellingShingle Research
Fischer-Grönlund, Catarina
Brännström, Margareta
Isaksson, Ulf
Psychometric testing of the Swedish version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP)
topic_facet Research
description BACKGROUND: Moral distress has been described as moral constraints and uncertainty connected with guilty feelings of being unable to give care in accordance with one’s values for good care. Various instruments to measure moral distress have been developed. The instrument measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP) was developed to capture the experience and frequency of moral distress among various healthcare professionals. The MMD-HP has been translated and culturally adapted into the Swedish language and context; however, the translation has not been validated. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Swedish version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP). METHODS: Eighty-nine staff from various professions at a hospital in northern Sweden participated in the study. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed to check for consistency with the original version of the MMD-HP. To evaluate internal consistency, Cronbach’s alpha was calculated for each domain and for the scale as a whole. RESULTS: The scale as a whole showed a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.96, with a range between 0.84 and 0.90 between the different subscales. A confirmatory factor analysis based on the original four-factor structure showed good fit indices with a χ(2)/df of 0.67, CFI at 1.00, TLI at 1.02 and NFI at 0.97. RMSEA was at 0.00, and SRMR was at 0.08. A comparison of the total score between three equally large groups of years of experience at the present workplace showed no significant differences (F = 0.09, df = 2, p = 0.912). CONCLUSIONS: We found that the Swedish version of the MMD-HP has shown validity and reliability for use in a Swedish context for measuring moral distress among health personnel.
format Text
author Fischer-Grönlund, Catarina
Brännström, Margareta
Isaksson, Ulf
author_facet Fischer-Grönlund, Catarina
Brännström, Margareta
Isaksson, Ulf
author_sort Fischer-Grönlund, Catarina
title Psychometric testing of the Swedish version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP)
title_short Psychometric testing of the Swedish version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP)
title_full Psychometric testing of the Swedish version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP)
title_fullStr Psychometric testing of the Swedish version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP)
title_full_unstemmed Psychometric testing of the Swedish version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (MMD-HP)
title_sort psychometric testing of the swedish version of the measure of moral distress for healthcare professionals (mmd-hp)
publisher BioMed Central
publishDate 2023
url http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228011/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37254086
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00916-x
genre Northern Sweden
genre_facet Northern Sweden
op_source BMC Med Ethics
op_relation http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10228011/
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37254086
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00916-x
op_rights © The Author(s) 2023
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-023-00916-x
container_title BMC Medical Ethics
container_volume 24
container_issue 1
_version_ 1769008202346659840