Using the Sensible Heat Flux Eddy Covariance-Based Exchange Coefficient to Calculate Latent Heat Flux from Moisture Mean Gradients Over Snow.

• Published in: Boundary-Layer Meteorology
• Main Authors: González-Herrero, Sergi, Sigmund, Armin, Haugeneder, Michael, Hames, Océane, Huwald, Hendrik, Fiddes, Joel, Lehning, Michael
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2024
• Subjects: Boundary layer; Bowen ratio; Eddy-covariance; Latent heat flux; Monin–Obukhov similarity theory; Snow; Antarc*; Antarctica
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-024-00864-y; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38706472; https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11068579/

In absence of the high-frequency measurements of wind components, sonic temperature and water vapour required by the eddy covariance (EC) method, Monin-Obukhov similarity theory (MOST) is often used to calculate heat fluxes. However, MOST requires assumptions of stability corrections and roughness lengths. In most environments and weather situations, roughness length and stability corrections have high uncertainty. Here, we revisit the modified Bowen-ratio method, which we call C-method, to calculate the latent heat flux over snow. In the absence of high-frequency water vapour measurements, we use sonic anemometer data, which have become much more standard. This method uses the exchange coefficient for sensible heat flux to estimate latent-heat flux. Theory predicts the two exchange coefficients to be equal and the method avoids assuming roughness lengths and stability corrections. We apply this method to two datasets from high mountain (Alps) and polar (Antarctica) environments and compare it with MOST and the three-layer model (3LM). We show that roughness length has a great impact on heat fluxes calculated using MOST and that different calculation methods over snow lead to very different results. Instead, the 3LM leads to good results, in part due to the fact that it avoids roughness length assumptions to calculate heat fluxes. The C-method presented performs overall better or comparable to established MOST with different stability corrections and provides results comparable to the direct EC method. An application of this method is provided for a new station installed in the Pamir mountains.