Machine Vision Requires Fewer Repeat Measurements than Colorimeters for Precise Seafood Colour Measurement.

• Published in: Foods
• Main Authors: Watkins, Kieren, Hastie, Melindee, Ha, Minh, Hepworth, Graham, Warner, Robyn
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: MDPI 2024
• Subjects: Delta E; Minolta; Nix; fish; prawns; rockling; salmon; standard error of the mean; technical replicate; Atlantic salmon; Salmo salar
• Online Access: https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13071110; https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38611414

The colour of seafood flesh is often not homogenous, hence measurement of colour requires repeat measurements to obtain a representative average. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal number of repeat colour measurements required for three different devices [machine vision (digital image using camera, and computer processing); Nix Pro; Minolta CR400 colorimeter] when measuring three species of seafood (Atlantic salmon, Salmo salar, n = 8; rockling, Genypterus tigerinus, n = 8; banana prawns, Penaeus merguiensis, n = 105) for raw and cooked samples. Two methods of analysis for number of repeat measurements required were compared. Method 1 was based on minimising the standard error of the mean and Method 2 was based on minimising the difference in colour over repeat measurements. Across species, using Method 1, machine vision required an average of four repeat measurements, whereas Nix Pro and Minolta required 13 and 12, respectively. For Method 2, machine vision required an average of one repeat measurement compared to nine for Nix Pro and Minolta. Machine vision required fewer repeat measurements due to its lower residual variance: 0.51 compared to 3.2 and 2.5 for Nix Pro and Minolta, respectively. In conclusion, machine vision requires fewer repeat measurements than colorimeters to precisely measure the colour of salmon, prawns, and rockling.