Budget of tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models

The tropospheric ozone budget during the Tropospheric Ozone Production about the Spring Equinox (TOPSE) campaign has been studied using two chemical transport models ( CTMs): HANK and the Model of Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 2 (MOZART-2). The two models have similar chemical schemes...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research
Main Authors: Emmons, L., Hess, P., Klonecki, A., Tie, X., Horowitz, L., Lamarque, J., Kinnison, D., Brasseur, G., Atlas, E., Browell, E., Cantrell, C., Eisele, F., Mauldin, R., Merrill, J., Ridley, B., Shetter, R.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2003
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-01A4-D
http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-0039-D
id ftpubman:oai:pure.mpg.de:item_995317
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubman:oai:pure.mpg.de:item_995317 2023-08-27T04:12:23+02:00 Budget of tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models Emmons, L. Hess, P. Klonecki, A. Tie, X. Horowitz, L. Lamarque, J. Kinnison, D. Brasseur, G. Atlas, E. Browell, E. Cantrell, C. Eisele, F. Mauldin, R. Merrill, J. Ridley, B. Shetter, R. 2003-04-26 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-01A4-D http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-0039-D eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1029/2002JD002665 http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-01A4-D http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-0039-D info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2003 ftpubman https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002665 2023-08-02T01:34:38Z The tropospheric ozone budget during the Tropospheric Ozone Production about the Spring Equinox (TOPSE) campaign has been studied using two chemical transport models ( CTMs): HANK and the Model of Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 2 (MOZART-2). The two models have similar chemical schemes but use different meteorological fields, with HANK using MM5 (Pennsylvania State University, National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Modeling System) and MOZART-2 driven by European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) fields. Both models simulate ozone in good agreement with the observations but underestimate NOx. The models indicate that in the troposphere, averaged over the northern middle and high latitudes, chemical production of ozone drives the increase of ozone seen in the spring. Both ozone gross chemical production and loss increase greatly over the spring months. The in situ production is much larger than the net stratospheric input, and the deposition and horizontal fluxes are relatively small in comparison to chemical destruction. The net production depends sensitively on the concentrations of H2O, HO2 and NO, which differ slightly in the two models. Both models underestimate the chemical production calculated in a steady state model using TOPSE measurements, but the chemical loss rates agree well. Measures of the stratospheric influence on tropospheric ozone in relation to in situ ozone production are discussed. Two different estimates of the stratospheric fraction of O-3 in the Northern Hemisphere troposphere indicate it decreases from 30-50% in February to 15-30% in June. A sensitivity study of the effect of a perturbation in the vertical flux on tropospheric ozone indicates the contribution from the stratosphere is approximately 15%. Article in Journal/Newspaper Tropospheric Ozone Production About the Spring Equinox Max Planck Society: MPG.PuRe Journal of Geophysical Research 108 D8
institution Open Polar
collection Max Planck Society: MPG.PuRe
op_collection_id ftpubman
language English
description The tropospheric ozone budget during the Tropospheric Ozone Production about the Spring Equinox (TOPSE) campaign has been studied using two chemical transport models ( CTMs): HANK and the Model of Ozone and Related chemical Tracers, version 2 (MOZART-2). The two models have similar chemical schemes but use different meteorological fields, with HANK using MM5 (Pennsylvania State University, National Center for Atmospheric Research Mesoscale Modeling System) and MOZART-2 driven by European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) fields. Both models simulate ozone in good agreement with the observations but underestimate NOx. The models indicate that in the troposphere, averaged over the northern middle and high latitudes, chemical production of ozone drives the increase of ozone seen in the spring. Both ozone gross chemical production and loss increase greatly over the spring months. The in situ production is much larger than the net stratospheric input, and the deposition and horizontal fluxes are relatively small in comparison to chemical destruction. The net production depends sensitively on the concentrations of H2O, HO2 and NO, which differ slightly in the two models. Both models underestimate the chemical production calculated in a steady state model using TOPSE measurements, but the chemical loss rates agree well. Measures of the stratospheric influence on tropospheric ozone in relation to in situ ozone production are discussed. Two different estimates of the stratospheric fraction of O-3 in the Northern Hemisphere troposphere indicate it decreases from 30-50% in February to 15-30% in June. A sensitivity study of the effect of a perturbation in the vertical flux on tropospheric ozone indicates the contribution from the stratosphere is approximately 15%.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Emmons, L.
Hess, P.
Klonecki, A.
Tie, X.
Horowitz, L.
Lamarque, J.
Kinnison, D.
Brasseur, G.
Atlas, E.
Browell, E.
Cantrell, C.
Eisele, F.
Mauldin, R.
Merrill, J.
Ridley, B.
Shetter, R.
spellingShingle Emmons, L.
Hess, P.
Klonecki, A.
Tie, X.
Horowitz, L.
Lamarque, J.
Kinnison, D.
Brasseur, G.
Atlas, E.
Browell, E.
Cantrell, C.
Eisele, F.
Mauldin, R.
Merrill, J.
Ridley, B.
Shetter, R.
Budget of tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models
author_facet Emmons, L.
Hess, P.
Klonecki, A.
Tie, X.
Horowitz, L.
Lamarque, J.
Kinnison, D.
Brasseur, G.
Atlas, E.
Browell, E.
Cantrell, C.
Eisele, F.
Mauldin, R.
Merrill, J.
Ridley, B.
Shetter, R.
author_sort Emmons, L.
title Budget of tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models
title_short Budget of tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models
title_full Budget of tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models
title_fullStr Budget of tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models
title_full_unstemmed Budget of tropospheric ozone during TOPSE from two chemical transport models
title_sort budget of tropospheric ozone during topse from two chemical transport models
publishDate 2003
url http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-01A4-D
http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-0039-D
genre Tropospheric Ozone Production About the Spring Equinox
genre_facet Tropospheric Ozone Production About the Spring Equinox
op_source Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1029/2002JD002665
http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-01A4-D
http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0003-0039-D
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2002JD002665
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research
container_volume 108
container_issue D8
_version_ 1775356464171319296