An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis

The surface heat flux feedback is estimated in the Atlantic and the extra-tropical Indo-Pacific, using monthly heat flux and sea surface temperature anomaly data from control simulations with five global climate models, and it is compared to estimates derived from COADS and the NCEP reanalysis. In a...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Climate Dynamics
Main Authors: Frankignoul, C., Kestenare, E., Botzet, M., Carril, A., Drange, H., Pardaens, A., Terray, L., Sutton, R.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2004
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-007B-4
http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-007A-6
id ftpubman:oai:pure.mpg.de:item_995162
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubman:oai:pure.mpg.de:item_995162 2023-08-27T04:11:01+02:00 An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis Frankignoul, C. Kestenare, E. Botzet, M. Carril, A. Drange, H. Pardaens, A. Terray, L. Sutton, R. 2004-04 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-007B-4 http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-007A-6 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00382-003-0388-3 http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-007B-4 http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-007A-6 Climate Dynamics info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2004 ftpubman https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0388-3 2023-08-02T01:34:38Z The surface heat flux feedback is estimated in the Atlantic and the extra-tropical Indo-Pacific, using monthly heat flux and sea surface temperature anomaly data from control simulations with five global climate models, and it is compared to estimates derived from COADS and the NCEP reanalysis. In all data sets, the heat flux feedback is negative nearly everywhere and damps the sea surface temperature anomalies. At extra-tropical latitudes, it is strongly dominated by the turbulent fluxes. The radiative feedback can be positive or negative, depending on location and season, but it remains small, except in some models in the tropical Atlantic. The negative heat flux feedback is strong in the mid-latitude storm tracks, exceeding 40 W m(-2) K-1 at place, but in the Northern Hemisphere it is substantially underestimated in several models. The negative feedback weakens at high latitudes, although the models do not reproduce the weak positive feedback found in NCEP in the northern North Atlantic. The main differences are found in the tropical Atlantic where the heat flux feedback is weakly negative in some models , as in the observations, and strongly negative in others where it can exceed 30 W m(-2) K-1 at large scales, in part because of a strong contribution of the radiative fluxes, in particular during spring. A comparison between models with similar atmospheric or oceanic components suggests that the atmospheric model is primarily responsible for the heat flux feedback differences at extra-tropical latitudes. In the tropical Atlantic, the ocean behavior plays an equal role. The differences in heat flux feedback in the tropical Atlantic are reflected in the sea surface temperature anomaly persistence, which is too small in models where the heat flux damping is large. A good representation of the heat flux feedback is thus required to simulate climate variability realistically Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic Max Planck Society: MPG.PuRe Pacific Climate Dynamics 22 4 373 388
institution Open Polar
collection Max Planck Society: MPG.PuRe
op_collection_id ftpubman
language English
description The surface heat flux feedback is estimated in the Atlantic and the extra-tropical Indo-Pacific, using monthly heat flux and sea surface temperature anomaly data from control simulations with five global climate models, and it is compared to estimates derived from COADS and the NCEP reanalysis. In all data sets, the heat flux feedback is negative nearly everywhere and damps the sea surface temperature anomalies. At extra-tropical latitudes, it is strongly dominated by the turbulent fluxes. The radiative feedback can be positive or negative, depending on location and season, but it remains small, except in some models in the tropical Atlantic. The negative heat flux feedback is strong in the mid-latitude storm tracks, exceeding 40 W m(-2) K-1 at place, but in the Northern Hemisphere it is substantially underestimated in several models. The negative feedback weakens at high latitudes, although the models do not reproduce the weak positive feedback found in NCEP in the northern North Atlantic. The main differences are found in the tropical Atlantic where the heat flux feedback is weakly negative in some models , as in the observations, and strongly negative in others where it can exceed 30 W m(-2) K-1 at large scales, in part because of a strong contribution of the radiative fluxes, in particular during spring. A comparison between models with similar atmospheric or oceanic components suggests that the atmospheric model is primarily responsible for the heat flux feedback differences at extra-tropical latitudes. In the tropical Atlantic, the ocean behavior plays an equal role. The differences in heat flux feedback in the tropical Atlantic are reflected in the sea surface temperature anomaly persistence, which is too small in models where the heat flux damping is large. A good representation of the heat flux feedback is thus required to simulate climate variability realistically
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Frankignoul, C.
Kestenare, E.
Botzet, M.
Carril, A.
Drange, H.
Pardaens, A.
Terray, L.
Sutton, R.
spellingShingle Frankignoul, C.
Kestenare, E.
Botzet, M.
Carril, A.
Drange, H.
Pardaens, A.
Terray, L.
Sutton, R.
An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
author_facet Frankignoul, C.
Kestenare, E.
Botzet, M.
Carril, A.
Drange, H.
Pardaens, A.
Terray, L.
Sutton, R.
author_sort Frankignoul, C.
title An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
title_short An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
title_full An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
title_fullStr An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
title_full_unstemmed An intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, COADS and the NCEP reanalysis
title_sort intercomparison between the surface heat flux feedback in five coupled models, coads and the ncep reanalysis
publishDate 2004
url http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-007B-4
http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-007A-6
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_source Climate Dynamics
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1007/s00382-003-0388-3
http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-007B-4
http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0012-007A-6
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-003-0388-3
container_title Climate Dynamics
container_volume 22
container_issue 4
container_start_page 373
op_container_end_page 388
_version_ 1775353448707915776