Ground-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements
This paper reports on ground-based validation of the atmospheric OClO data record produced within the framework of EUMETSAT's Satellite Application Facility on Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring (AC SAF) using the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME)-2A and GOME-2B instrument measurements, c...
Published in: | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2022
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-D239-9 |
_version_ | 1821768038883524608 |
---|---|
author | Pinardi, G. Roozendael, M. Hendrick, F. Richter, A. Valks, P. Alwarda, R. Bognar, K. a Frieß, U. Granville, J. Gu, M. Johnston, P. Prados-Roman, C. Querel, R. Strong, K. Wagner, T. Wittrock, F. Gonzalez, M. |
author_facet | Pinardi, G. Roozendael, M. Hendrick, F. Richter, A. Valks, P. Alwarda, R. Bognar, K. a Frieß, U. Granville, J. Gu, M. Johnston, P. Prados-Roman, C. Querel, R. Strong, K. Wagner, T. Wittrock, F. Gonzalez, M. |
author_sort | Pinardi, G. |
collection | Max Planck Society: MPG.PuRe |
container_issue | 11 |
container_start_page | 3439 |
container_title | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
container_volume | 15 |
description | This paper reports on ground-based validation of the atmospheric OClO data record produced within the framework of EUMETSAT's Satellite Application Facility on Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring (AC SAF) using the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME)-2A and GOME-2B instrument measurements, covering the 2007–2016 and 2013–2016 periods, respectively. OClO slant column densities are compared to correlative measurements collected from nine Zenith-Scattered-Light Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (ZSL-DOAS) instruments from the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) distributed in both the Arctic and Antarctic. Sensitivity tests are performed on the ground-based data to estimate the impact of the different OClO DOAS analysis settings. On this basis, we infer systematic uncertainties of about 25 % (i.e., about 3.75×1013 molec. cm−2) between the different ground-based data analyses, reaching total uncertainties ranging from about 26 % to 33 % for the different stations (i.e., around 4 to 5×1013 molec. cm−2). Time series at the different sites show good agreement between satellite and ground-based data for both the inter-annual variability and the overall OClO seasonal behavior. GOME-2A results are found to be noisier than those of GOME-2B, especially after 2011, probably due to instrumental degradation effects. Daily linear regression analysis for OClO-activated periods yield correlation coefficients of 0.8 for GOME-2A and 0.87 for GOME-2B, with slopes with respect to the ground-based data ensemble of 0.64 and 0.72, respectively. Satellite minus ground-based offsets are within 8×1013 molec. cm−2, with some differences between GOME-2A and GOME-2B depending on the station. Overall, considering all the stations, a median offset of about molec. cm−2 is found for both GOME-2 instruments. |
format | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
genre | Antarc* Antarctic Arctic |
genre_facet | Antarc* Antarctic Arctic |
geographic | Arctic Antarctic |
geographic_facet | Arctic Antarctic |
id | ftpubman:oai:pure.mpg.de:item_3398309 |
institution | Open Polar |
language | English |
op_collection_id | ftpubman |
op_container_end_page | 3463 |
op_doi | https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3439-2022 |
op_relation | info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/amt-15-3439-2022 http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-D239-9 |
op_source | Atmospheric Measurement Techniques |
publishDate | 2022 |
record_format | openpolar |
spelling | ftpubman:oai:pure.mpg.de:item_3398309 2025-01-16T19:35:15+00:00 Ground-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements Pinardi, G. Roozendael, M. Hendrick, F. Richter, A. Valks, P. Alwarda, R. Bognar, K. a Frieß, U. Granville, J. Gu, M. Johnston, P. Prados-Roman, C. Querel, R. Strong, K. Wagner, T. Wittrock, F. Gonzalez, M. 2022-07-04 http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-D239-9 eng eng info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.5194/amt-15-3439-2022 http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-D239-9 Atmospheric Measurement Techniques info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2022 ftpubman https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-15-3439-2022 2023-08-02T01:13:53Z This paper reports on ground-based validation of the atmospheric OClO data record produced within the framework of EUMETSAT's Satellite Application Facility on Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring (AC SAF) using the Global Ozone Monitoring Experiment (GOME)-2A and GOME-2B instrument measurements, covering the 2007–2016 and 2013–2016 periods, respectively. OClO slant column densities are compared to correlative measurements collected from nine Zenith-Scattered-Light Differential Optical Absorption Spectroscopy (ZSL-DOAS) instruments from the Network for the Detection of Atmospheric Composition Change (NDACC) distributed in both the Arctic and Antarctic. Sensitivity tests are performed on the ground-based data to estimate the impact of the different OClO DOAS analysis settings. On this basis, we infer systematic uncertainties of about 25 % (i.e., about 3.75×1013 molec. cm−2) between the different ground-based data analyses, reaching total uncertainties ranging from about 26 % to 33 % for the different stations (i.e., around 4 to 5×1013 molec. cm−2). Time series at the different sites show good agreement between satellite and ground-based data for both the inter-annual variability and the overall OClO seasonal behavior. GOME-2A results are found to be noisier than those of GOME-2B, especially after 2011, probably due to instrumental degradation effects. Daily linear regression analysis for OClO-activated periods yield correlation coefficients of 0.8 for GOME-2A and 0.87 for GOME-2B, with slopes with respect to the ground-based data ensemble of 0.64 and 0.72, respectively. Satellite minus ground-based offsets are within 8×1013 molec. cm−2, with some differences between GOME-2A and GOME-2B depending on the station. Overall, considering all the stations, a median offset of about molec. cm−2 is found for both GOME-2 instruments. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Arctic Max Planck Society: MPG.PuRe Arctic Antarctic Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 15 11 3439 3463 |
spellingShingle | Pinardi, G. Roozendael, M. Hendrick, F. Richter, A. Valks, P. Alwarda, R. Bognar, K. a Frieß, U. Granville, J. Gu, M. Johnston, P. Prados-Roman, C. Querel, R. Strong, K. Wagner, T. Wittrock, F. Gonzalez, M. Ground-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements |
title | Ground-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements |
title_full | Ground-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements |
title_fullStr | Ground-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements |
title_full_unstemmed | Ground-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements |
title_short | Ground-based validation of the MetOp-A and MetOp-B GOME-2 OClO measurements |
title_sort | ground-based validation of the metop-a and metop-b gome-2 oclo measurements |
url | http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-000A-D239-9 |