Millet agriculture dispersed from Northeast China to the Russian Far East: integrating archaeology, genetics, and linguistics

Broomcorn and foxtail millets were being cultivated in the West Liao River basin in Northeast China by at least the sixth millennium BCE. However, when and how millet agriculture spread from there to the north and east remains poorly understood. Here, we trace the dispersal of millet agriculture fro...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Archaeological Research in Asia
Main Authors: Li, T., Ning, C., Zhushchikhovskaya, I., Hudson, M., Robbeets, M.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D82B-8
http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D82D-6
id ftpubman:oai:pure.mpg.de:item_3213114
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpubman:oai:pure.mpg.de:item_3213114 2023-08-27T04:12:25+02:00 Millet agriculture dispersed from Northeast China to the Russian Far East: integrating archaeology, genetics, and linguistics Li, T. Ning, C. Zhushchikhovskaya, I. Hudson, M. Robbeets, M. 2020-06 application/pdf http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D82B-8 http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D82D-6 eng eng info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/646612 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ara.2020.100177 http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D82B-8 http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D82D-6 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Archaeological Research in Asia info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2020 ftpubman https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ara.2020.100177 2023-08-02T01:04:58Z Broomcorn and foxtail millets were being cultivated in the West Liao River basin in Northeast China by at least the sixth millennium BCE. However, when and how millet agriculture spread from there to the north and east remains poorly understood. Here, we trace the dispersal of millet agriculture from Northeast China to the Russian Far East and weigh demic against cultural diffusion as mechanisms for that dispersal. We compare two routes for the spread of millet into the Russian Far East discussed in previous research—an inland route across Manchuria, and a coastal/inland route initially following the Liaodong Peninsula and Yalu River—using an archaeological dataset including millet remains, pottery, stone tools, spindle whorls, jade and figurines. We then integrate the archaeological evidence with linguistic and genetic findings in an approach we term ‘triangulation’. We conclude that an expansion of agricultural societies in Northeast China during the Middle to Late Hongshan (4000–3000 BCE) coincided with the arrival of millet cultivation in eastern Heilongjiang and the Primorye province of the Russian Far East. Our findings support the inland, Manchuria route for the dispersal of millet to the Primorye and suggest that, as well as long-distance cultural exchange, demic diffusion was also involved. Our results are broadly compatible with the farming/language dispersal hypothesis and consistent with a link between the spread of millet farming and proto-Tungusic, the language ancestral to the contemporary Tungusic languages, in late Neolithic Northeast Asia. © 2020 The Authors 1. Introduction 1.1. Neolithic expansions in East Asia 1.2. Millet cultivation and expansions 1.3. Millet dispersals to the Primorye: previous research 1.4. Natural setting and environment 2. Routes of millet dispersal: Yalu vs. Manchuria models 2.1. Archaeological evidence 2.1.1. Millet remains 2.1.2. Stone tools 2.1.3. Ceramics, portable art and spindle whorls 2.1.4. Jade 2.1.5. Stone circles 2.1.6. Summary of archaeological evidence ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Tungusic languages Max Planck Society: MPG.PuRe Archaeological Research in Asia 22 100177
institution Open Polar
collection Max Planck Society: MPG.PuRe
op_collection_id ftpubman
language English
description Broomcorn and foxtail millets were being cultivated in the West Liao River basin in Northeast China by at least the sixth millennium BCE. However, when and how millet agriculture spread from there to the north and east remains poorly understood. Here, we trace the dispersal of millet agriculture from Northeast China to the Russian Far East and weigh demic against cultural diffusion as mechanisms for that dispersal. We compare two routes for the spread of millet into the Russian Far East discussed in previous research—an inland route across Manchuria, and a coastal/inland route initially following the Liaodong Peninsula and Yalu River—using an archaeological dataset including millet remains, pottery, stone tools, spindle whorls, jade and figurines. We then integrate the archaeological evidence with linguistic and genetic findings in an approach we term ‘triangulation’. We conclude that an expansion of agricultural societies in Northeast China during the Middle to Late Hongshan (4000–3000 BCE) coincided with the arrival of millet cultivation in eastern Heilongjiang and the Primorye province of the Russian Far East. Our findings support the inland, Manchuria route for the dispersal of millet to the Primorye and suggest that, as well as long-distance cultural exchange, demic diffusion was also involved. Our results are broadly compatible with the farming/language dispersal hypothesis and consistent with a link between the spread of millet farming and proto-Tungusic, the language ancestral to the contemporary Tungusic languages, in late Neolithic Northeast Asia. © 2020 The Authors 1. Introduction 1.1. Neolithic expansions in East Asia 1.2. Millet cultivation and expansions 1.3. Millet dispersals to the Primorye: previous research 1.4. Natural setting and environment 2. Routes of millet dispersal: Yalu vs. Manchuria models 2.1. Archaeological evidence 2.1.1. Millet remains 2.1.2. Stone tools 2.1.3. Ceramics, portable art and spindle whorls 2.1.4. Jade 2.1.5. Stone circles 2.1.6. Summary of archaeological evidence ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Li, T.
Ning, C.
Zhushchikhovskaya, I.
Hudson, M.
Robbeets, M.
spellingShingle Li, T.
Ning, C.
Zhushchikhovskaya, I.
Hudson, M.
Robbeets, M.
Millet agriculture dispersed from Northeast China to the Russian Far East: integrating archaeology, genetics, and linguistics
author_facet Li, T.
Ning, C.
Zhushchikhovskaya, I.
Hudson, M.
Robbeets, M.
author_sort Li, T.
title Millet agriculture dispersed from Northeast China to the Russian Far East: integrating archaeology, genetics, and linguistics
title_short Millet agriculture dispersed from Northeast China to the Russian Far East: integrating archaeology, genetics, and linguistics
title_full Millet agriculture dispersed from Northeast China to the Russian Far East: integrating archaeology, genetics, and linguistics
title_fullStr Millet agriculture dispersed from Northeast China to the Russian Far East: integrating archaeology, genetics, and linguistics
title_full_unstemmed Millet agriculture dispersed from Northeast China to the Russian Far East: integrating archaeology, genetics, and linguistics
title_sort millet agriculture dispersed from northeast china to the russian far east: integrating archaeology, genetics, and linguistics
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D82B-8
http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D82D-6
genre Tungusic languages
genre_facet Tungusic languages
op_source Archaeological Research in Asia
op_relation info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/646612
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/doi/10.1016/j.ara.2020.100177
http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D82B-8
http://hdl.handle.net/21.11116/0000-0005-D82D-6
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ara.2020.100177
container_title Archaeological Research in Asia
container_volume 22
container_start_page 100177
_version_ 1775356537769820160