The ability of the adjoint technique to recover decadal variability of the North Atlantic circulation

• Published in: Ocean Modelling
• Main Authors: Bruedgam, M., Eden, C., Czeschel, L., Baehr, J.
• Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: 2013
• Subjects: North Atlantic
• Online Access: http://hdl.handle.net/11858/00-001M-0000-0019-D9F6-8

Different oceanic data assimilation products show rather different decadal-scale variability, in particular for the Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (MOC). In order to understand these differences we evaluate the ability of the adjoint technique to reproduce MOC variability using surface heat flux forcing as the control parameter. We find that in a perfect model framework and for a reasonable weighting the adjoint method is, in principle, successful at reproducing decadal-scale MOC variability if adequate synthetic observations and a priori information of the control parameter are given. Temperature of the upper 1000 m and sea surface height and a priori information about surface heat fluxes contain the most useful information. Using only salinity or only synthetic hydrography below 1000 m, the method fails to converge and to reconstruct MOC variability, given surface heat flux as the only control parameter. In order to provide error bounds for current assimilation products, prescribed artificial errors for a priori control parameter, synthetic observations and initial conditions are introduced systematically to our setup. We find that errors with reasonable magnitude in synthetic observations as well as a priori information of the surface heat fluxes lead to a reconstructed decadal-scale MOC variability with tolerable errors of less than a few percent. Errors in initial conditions lead to a "cold start" problem and can degrade the quality of the MOC reconstruction, but can be damped by sufficient a priori information about the surface forcing in the subsequent integration, even without including the initial conditions as a control parameter. The impact of a model error is analyzed by assimilating synthetic observations from different model configurations, which resembles most likely an underestimation of the "real" model error. Even with this optimistic estimate, the reconstruction is very sensitive to the model error and leads to a large error in the reconstructed MOC variability. Taking all ...