Arctic network builders: The Arctic Coal Company's operations on Spitsbergen and its relationship with the environment

In 1906, two American industrialists, John Munroe Longyear and Frederick Ayer, formed the Arctic Coal Company to make the first large scale attempt at mining in the high-Arctic location of Spitsbergen, north of the Norwegian mainland. In doing so, they encountered numerous obstacles and built an org...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hartnell, Cameron C.
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: Michigan Technological University 2009
Subjects:
Online Access:http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3389743
id ftproquest:oai:pqdtoai.proquest.com:3389743
record_format openpolar
spelling ftproquest:oai:pqdtoai.proquest.com:3389743 2023-05-15T14:38:15+02:00 Arctic network builders: The Arctic Coal Company's operations on Spitsbergen and its relationship with the environment Hartnell, Cameron C. 2009-01-01 00:00:01.0 http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3389743 ENG eng Michigan Technological University http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3389743 Archaeology|American history|Modern history|Environmental science thesis 2009 ftproquest 2021-03-13T17:40:37Z In 1906, two American industrialists, John Munroe Longyear and Frederick Ayer, formed the Arctic Coal Company to make the first large scale attempt at mining in the high-Arctic location of Spitsbergen, north of the Norwegian mainland. In doing so, they encountered numerous obstacles and built an organization that attempted to overcome them. The Americans sold out in 1916 but others followed, eventually culminating in the transformation of a largely undeveloped landscape into a mining region. This work uses John Law’s network approach of the Actor Network Theory (ANT) framework to explain how the Arctic Coal Company built a mining network in this environmentally difficult region and why they made the choices they did. It does so by identifying and analyzing the problems the company encountered and the strategies they used to overcome them by focusing on three major components of the operations; the company’s four land claims, its technical system and its main settlement, Longyear City. Extensive comparison between aspects of Longyear City and the company’s choices of technology with other American examples place analysis of the company in a wider context and helps isolate unique aspects of mining in the high-Arctic. American examples dominate comparative sections because Americans dominated the ownership and upper management of the company. Thesis Arctic Spitsbergen PQDT Open: Open Access Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest) Arctic
institution Open Polar
collection PQDT Open: Open Access Dissertations and Theses (ProQuest)
op_collection_id ftproquest
language English
topic Archaeology|American history|Modern history|Environmental science
spellingShingle Archaeology|American history|Modern history|Environmental science
Hartnell, Cameron C.
Arctic network builders: The Arctic Coal Company's operations on Spitsbergen and its relationship with the environment
topic_facet Archaeology|American history|Modern history|Environmental science
description In 1906, two American industrialists, John Munroe Longyear and Frederick Ayer, formed the Arctic Coal Company to make the first large scale attempt at mining in the high-Arctic location of Spitsbergen, north of the Norwegian mainland. In doing so, they encountered numerous obstacles and built an organization that attempted to overcome them. The Americans sold out in 1916 but others followed, eventually culminating in the transformation of a largely undeveloped landscape into a mining region. This work uses John Law’s network approach of the Actor Network Theory (ANT) framework to explain how the Arctic Coal Company built a mining network in this environmentally difficult region and why they made the choices they did. It does so by identifying and analyzing the problems the company encountered and the strategies they used to overcome them by focusing on three major components of the operations; the company’s four land claims, its technical system and its main settlement, Longyear City. Extensive comparison between aspects of Longyear City and the company’s choices of technology with other American examples place analysis of the company in a wider context and helps isolate unique aspects of mining in the high-Arctic. American examples dominate comparative sections because Americans dominated the ownership and upper management of the company.
format Thesis
author Hartnell, Cameron C.
author_facet Hartnell, Cameron C.
author_sort Hartnell, Cameron C.
title Arctic network builders: The Arctic Coal Company's operations on Spitsbergen and its relationship with the environment
title_short Arctic network builders: The Arctic Coal Company's operations on Spitsbergen and its relationship with the environment
title_full Arctic network builders: The Arctic Coal Company's operations on Spitsbergen and its relationship with the environment
title_fullStr Arctic network builders: The Arctic Coal Company's operations on Spitsbergen and its relationship with the environment
title_full_unstemmed Arctic network builders: The Arctic Coal Company's operations on Spitsbergen and its relationship with the environment
title_sort arctic network builders: the arctic coal company's operations on spitsbergen and its relationship with the environment
publisher Michigan Technological University
publishDate 2009
url http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3389743
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Spitsbergen
genre_facet Arctic
Spitsbergen
op_relation http://pqdtopen.proquest.com/#viewpdf?dispub=3389743
_version_ 1766310364318793728