Applying Decolonizing Theories and Methodologies in Archaeology to Two Collaborative Cultural Resource Management Projects

Decolonizing theories and methods were employed during two separate graduate research projects. The methods of the initial project were informed by political ecology, the landscape-level historical ecology theory, Tribal sovereignty, traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), Indigenous archaeology, an...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lanthier, Cydney K.
Format: Text
Language:English
Published: PDXScholar 2024
Subjects:
Online Access:https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/6672
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/context/open_access_etds/article/7757/viewcontent/Lanthier_psu_0180E_13315.pdf
id ftportlandstate:oai:pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu:open_access_etds-7757
record_format openpolar
spelling ftportlandstate:oai:pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu:open_access_etds-7757 2024-09-15T17:59:19+00:00 Applying Decolonizing Theories and Methodologies in Archaeology to Two Collaborative Cultural Resource Management Projects Lanthier, Cydney K. 2024-06-13T07:00:00Z application/pdf https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/6672 https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/context/open_access_etds/article/7757/viewcontent/Lanthier_psu_0180E_13315.pdf English eng PDXScholar https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/6672 https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/context/open_access_etds/article/7757/viewcontent/Lanthier_psu_0180E_13315.pdf In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s). Dissertations and Theses archaeology collaboration cultural resource management decolonization Indigenous political ecology Indigenous Studies text 2024 ftportlandstate 2024-08-15T23:36:02Z Decolonizing theories and methods were employed during two separate graduate research projects. The methods of the initial project were informed by political ecology, the landscape-level historical ecology theory, Tribal sovereignty, traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), Indigenous archaeology, and community based participatory research (CBPR). The initial project was based entirely on CBPR and purposed to gain National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) nomination as a Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) over a portion of the traditional landscape. This project was cancelled before completion. However, several methods involved in CBPR were employed before then. The second project took on more of the historical ecology and CBPR theoretical approaches with some political ecology influences. This project was carried out to its conclusion and included a detailed analysis of all known archaeological sites within the Bering Land Bridge National Preserve (BELA) and structured reporting of the data for submission to the National Park Service (NPS). Although very different in methodology I frame discussion of both projects in similar theoretical terms to address the larger context of Indigenous self-determination in Cultural Resource Management (CRM) and my career as an anthropologist and Indigenous ally moving forward. Both projects presented challenges that will inform future research endeavors, particularly relating to time constraints, preconceived or etic ideas around adequate project timelines, Indigenous time and resources, and data analysis. However, the opportunities learned from these experiences are invaluable and will serve to make me a better CRM professional in the future. Text Bering Land Bridge Portland State University: PDXScholar
institution Open Polar
collection Portland State University: PDXScholar
op_collection_id ftportlandstate
language English
topic archaeology
collaboration
cultural resource management
decolonization
Indigenous
political ecology
Indigenous Studies
spellingShingle archaeology
collaboration
cultural resource management
decolonization
Indigenous
political ecology
Indigenous Studies
Lanthier, Cydney K.
Applying Decolonizing Theories and Methodologies in Archaeology to Two Collaborative Cultural Resource Management Projects
topic_facet archaeology
collaboration
cultural resource management
decolonization
Indigenous
political ecology
Indigenous Studies
description Decolonizing theories and methods were employed during two separate graduate research projects. The methods of the initial project were informed by political ecology, the landscape-level historical ecology theory, Tribal sovereignty, traditional ecological knowledge (TEK), Indigenous archaeology, and community based participatory research (CBPR). The initial project was based entirely on CBPR and purposed to gain National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) nomination as a Traditional Cultural Property (TCP) over a portion of the traditional landscape. This project was cancelled before completion. However, several methods involved in CBPR were employed before then. The second project took on more of the historical ecology and CBPR theoretical approaches with some political ecology influences. This project was carried out to its conclusion and included a detailed analysis of all known archaeological sites within the Bering Land Bridge National Preserve (BELA) and structured reporting of the data for submission to the National Park Service (NPS). Although very different in methodology I frame discussion of both projects in similar theoretical terms to address the larger context of Indigenous self-determination in Cultural Resource Management (CRM) and my career as an anthropologist and Indigenous ally moving forward. Both projects presented challenges that will inform future research endeavors, particularly relating to time constraints, preconceived or etic ideas around adequate project timelines, Indigenous time and resources, and data analysis. However, the opportunities learned from these experiences are invaluable and will serve to make me a better CRM professional in the future.
format Text
author Lanthier, Cydney K.
author_facet Lanthier, Cydney K.
author_sort Lanthier, Cydney K.
title Applying Decolonizing Theories and Methodologies in Archaeology to Two Collaborative Cultural Resource Management Projects
title_short Applying Decolonizing Theories and Methodologies in Archaeology to Two Collaborative Cultural Resource Management Projects
title_full Applying Decolonizing Theories and Methodologies in Archaeology to Two Collaborative Cultural Resource Management Projects
title_fullStr Applying Decolonizing Theories and Methodologies in Archaeology to Two Collaborative Cultural Resource Management Projects
title_full_unstemmed Applying Decolonizing Theories and Methodologies in Archaeology to Two Collaborative Cultural Resource Management Projects
title_sort applying decolonizing theories and methodologies in archaeology to two collaborative cultural resource management projects
publisher PDXScholar
publishDate 2024
url https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/6672
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/context/open_access_etds/article/7757/viewcontent/Lanthier_psu_0180E_13315.pdf
genre Bering Land Bridge
genre_facet Bering Land Bridge
op_source Dissertations and Theses
op_relation https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/open_access_etds/6672
https://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/context/open_access_etds/article/7757/viewcontent/Lanthier_psu_0180E_13315.pdf
op_rights In Copyright. URI: http://rightsstatements.org/vocab/InC/1.0/ This Item is protected by copyright and/or related rights. You are free to use this Item in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s).
_version_ 1810436409995034624