Mind the gap - Part 1: Accurately locating warm marine boundary layer clouds and precipitation using spaceborne radars

Ground-based radar observations show that, over the eastern North Atlantic, 50 % of warm marine boundary layer (WMBL) hydrometeors occur below 1.2 km and have reflectivities of < -17 dBZ, thus making their detection from space susceptible to the extent of surface clutter and radar sensitivity. Su...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Main Authors: Lamer K., Kollias P., Battaglia A., Preval S.
Other Authors: Lamer, K., Kollias, P., Battaglia, A., Preval, S.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Copernicus GmbH 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/11583/2845696
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2363-2020
id ftpoltorinoiris:oai:iris.polito.it:11583/2845696
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpoltorinoiris:oai:iris.polito.it:11583/2845696 2024-02-11T10:06:40+01:00 Mind the gap - Part 1: Accurately locating warm marine boundary layer clouds and precipitation using spaceborne radars Lamer K. Kollias P. Battaglia A. Preval S. Lamer, K. Kollias, P. Battaglia, A. Preval, S. 2020 http://hdl.handle.net/11583/2845696 https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2363-2020 eng eng Copernicus GmbH info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000535260400001 volume:13 issue:5 firstpage:2363 lastpage:2379 numberofpages:17 journal:ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES http://hdl.handle.net/11583/2845696 doi:10.5194/amt-13-2363-2020 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85085086709 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess info:eu-repo/semantics/article 2020 ftpoltorinoiris https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2363-2020 2024-01-16T23:15:42Z Ground-based radar observations show that, over the eastern North Atlantic, 50 % of warm marine boundary layer (WMBL) hydrometeors occur below 1.2 km and have reflectivities of < -17 dBZ, thus making their detection from space susceptible to the extent of surface clutter and radar sensitivity. Surface clutter limits the ability of the CloudSat cloud profiling radar (CPR) to observe the true cloud base in ĝˆ1/452 % of the cloudy columns it detects and true virga base in ĝˆ1/480 %, meaning the CloudSat CPR often provides an incomplete view of even the clouds it does detect. Using forward simulations, we determine that a 250 m resolution radar would most accurately capture the boundaries of WMBL clouds and precipitation; that being said, because of sensitivity limitations, such a radar would suffer from cloud cover biases similar to those of the CloudSat CPR. Observations and forward simulations indicate that the CloudSat CPR fails to detect 29 %-43 % of the cloudy columns detected by ground-based sensors. Out of all configurations tested, the 7 dB more sensitive EarthCARE CPR performs best (only missing 9.0 % of cloudy columns) indicating that improving radar sensitivity is more important than decreasing the vertical extent of surface clutter for measuring cloud cover. However, because 50 % of WMBL systems are thinner than 400 m, they tend to be artificially stretched by long sensitive radar pulses, hence the EarthCARE CPR overestimation of cloud top height and hydrometeor fraction. Thus, it is recommended that the next generation of space-borne radars targeting WMBL science should operate interlaced pulse modes including both a highly sensitive long-pulse mode and a less sensitive but clutter-limiting short-pulse mode. Article in Journal/Newspaper North Atlantic PORTO@iris (Publications Open Repository TOrino - Politecnico di Torino) Atmospheric Measurement Techniques 13 5 2363 2379
institution Open Polar
collection PORTO@iris (Publications Open Repository TOrino - Politecnico di Torino)
op_collection_id ftpoltorinoiris
language English
description Ground-based radar observations show that, over the eastern North Atlantic, 50 % of warm marine boundary layer (WMBL) hydrometeors occur below 1.2 km and have reflectivities of < -17 dBZ, thus making their detection from space susceptible to the extent of surface clutter and radar sensitivity. Surface clutter limits the ability of the CloudSat cloud profiling radar (CPR) to observe the true cloud base in ĝˆ1/452 % of the cloudy columns it detects and true virga base in ĝˆ1/480 %, meaning the CloudSat CPR often provides an incomplete view of even the clouds it does detect. Using forward simulations, we determine that a 250 m resolution radar would most accurately capture the boundaries of WMBL clouds and precipitation; that being said, because of sensitivity limitations, such a radar would suffer from cloud cover biases similar to those of the CloudSat CPR. Observations and forward simulations indicate that the CloudSat CPR fails to detect 29 %-43 % of the cloudy columns detected by ground-based sensors. Out of all configurations tested, the 7 dB more sensitive EarthCARE CPR performs best (only missing 9.0 % of cloudy columns) indicating that improving radar sensitivity is more important than decreasing the vertical extent of surface clutter for measuring cloud cover. However, because 50 % of WMBL systems are thinner than 400 m, they tend to be artificially stretched by long sensitive radar pulses, hence the EarthCARE CPR overestimation of cloud top height and hydrometeor fraction. Thus, it is recommended that the next generation of space-borne radars targeting WMBL science should operate interlaced pulse modes including both a highly sensitive long-pulse mode and a less sensitive but clutter-limiting short-pulse mode.
author2 Lamer, K.
Kollias, P.
Battaglia, A.
Preval, S.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Lamer K.
Kollias P.
Battaglia A.
Preval S.
spellingShingle Lamer K.
Kollias P.
Battaglia A.
Preval S.
Mind the gap - Part 1: Accurately locating warm marine boundary layer clouds and precipitation using spaceborne radars
author_facet Lamer K.
Kollias P.
Battaglia A.
Preval S.
author_sort Lamer K.
title Mind the gap - Part 1: Accurately locating warm marine boundary layer clouds and precipitation using spaceborne radars
title_short Mind the gap - Part 1: Accurately locating warm marine boundary layer clouds and precipitation using spaceborne radars
title_full Mind the gap - Part 1: Accurately locating warm marine boundary layer clouds and precipitation using spaceborne radars
title_fullStr Mind the gap - Part 1: Accurately locating warm marine boundary layer clouds and precipitation using spaceborne radars
title_full_unstemmed Mind the gap - Part 1: Accurately locating warm marine boundary layer clouds and precipitation using spaceborne radars
title_sort mind the gap - part 1: accurately locating warm marine boundary layer clouds and precipitation using spaceborne radars
publisher Copernicus GmbH
publishDate 2020
url http://hdl.handle.net/11583/2845696
https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2363-2020
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/wos/WOS:000535260400001
volume:13
issue:5
firstpage:2363
lastpage:2379
numberofpages:17
journal:ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
http://hdl.handle.net/11583/2845696
doi:10.5194/amt-13-2363-2020
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/scopus/2-s2.0-85085086709
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-13-2363-2020
container_title Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
container_volume 13
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2363
op_container_end_page 2379
_version_ 1790604504204312576