Comparative analysis of frameworks and automation tools in terms of functionality and performance on the Salesforce CRM Platform
Article describes comparative analysis of both code and low-code automation tools together with frameworks used for developing graphical user interfaces that are available on the Salesforce Platform. The research is being carried out due to lack of such comparison in the available literature and due...
Published in: | Journal of Computer Sciences Institute |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Lublin University of Technology
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/3560 https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.3560 |
id |
ftpollublinojs:oai:ojs2.ph.pollub.pl:article/3560 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftpollublinojs:oai:ojs2.ph.pollub.pl:article/3560 2023-07-23T04:19:01+02:00 Comparative analysis of frameworks and automation tools in terms of functionality and performance on the Salesforce CRM Platform Ciechan, Damian 2023-06-30 application/pdf https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/3560 https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.3560 eng eng Lublin University of Technology https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/3560/3130 https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/3560 doi:10.35784/jcsi.3560 Copyright (c) 2023 Damian Ciechan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 Journal of Computer Sciences Institute; Vol 27 (2023); 154-161 Journal of Computer Sciences Institute; Tom 27 (2023); 154-161 2544-0764 Salesforce performance low-code tools frameworks info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion 2023 ftpollublinojs https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.3560 2023-07-03T23:06:10Z Article describes comparative analysis of both code and low-code automation tools together with frameworks used for developing graphical user interfaces that are available on the Salesforce Platform. The research is being carried out due to lack of such comparison in the available literature and due to popularity of the Salesforce CRM. Four automation tools were put together: code-based Apex Triggers and three point-and-click tools: Workflow Rules, Process Builder, Flow Builder. In each of the frameworks (Visualforce, Aura Components, Lightning Web Components) an application module was developed and example logic was implemented in each of the automation tools. DML operations insert, update, delete were compared in terms of performance and each technology was analyzed in terms of provided functionalities and limitations. It was concluded that the most efficient automation tool is Flow Builder and the Lightning Web Components framework is the best choice for developing graphical user interfaces. Article in Journal/Newspaper DML Teka Commission of Architecture, Urban Planning and Landscape Studies (Lublin University of Technology) Journal of Computer Sciences Institute 27 154 161 |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Teka Commission of Architecture, Urban Planning and Landscape Studies (Lublin University of Technology) |
op_collection_id |
ftpollublinojs |
language |
English |
topic |
Salesforce performance low-code tools frameworks |
spellingShingle |
Salesforce performance low-code tools frameworks Ciechan, Damian Comparative analysis of frameworks and automation tools in terms of functionality and performance on the Salesforce CRM Platform |
topic_facet |
Salesforce performance low-code tools frameworks |
description |
Article describes comparative analysis of both code and low-code automation tools together with frameworks used for developing graphical user interfaces that are available on the Salesforce Platform. The research is being carried out due to lack of such comparison in the available literature and due to popularity of the Salesforce CRM. Four automation tools were put together: code-based Apex Triggers and three point-and-click tools: Workflow Rules, Process Builder, Flow Builder. In each of the frameworks (Visualforce, Aura Components, Lightning Web Components) an application module was developed and example logic was implemented in each of the automation tools. DML operations insert, update, delete were compared in terms of performance and each technology was analyzed in terms of provided functionalities and limitations. It was concluded that the most efficient automation tool is Flow Builder and the Lightning Web Components framework is the best choice for developing graphical user interfaces. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Ciechan, Damian |
author_facet |
Ciechan, Damian |
author_sort |
Ciechan, Damian |
title |
Comparative analysis of frameworks and automation tools in terms of functionality and performance on the Salesforce CRM Platform |
title_short |
Comparative analysis of frameworks and automation tools in terms of functionality and performance on the Salesforce CRM Platform |
title_full |
Comparative analysis of frameworks and automation tools in terms of functionality and performance on the Salesforce CRM Platform |
title_fullStr |
Comparative analysis of frameworks and automation tools in terms of functionality and performance on the Salesforce CRM Platform |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparative analysis of frameworks and automation tools in terms of functionality and performance on the Salesforce CRM Platform |
title_sort |
comparative analysis of frameworks and automation tools in terms of functionality and performance on the salesforce crm platform |
publisher |
Lublin University of Technology |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/3560 https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.3560 |
genre |
DML |
genre_facet |
DML |
op_source |
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute; Vol 27 (2023); 154-161 Journal of Computer Sciences Institute; Tom 27 (2023); 154-161 2544-0764 |
op_relation |
https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/3560/3130 https://ph.pollub.pl/index.php/jcsi/article/view/3560 doi:10.35784/jcsi.3560 |
op_rights |
Copyright (c) 2023 Damian Ciechan https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.3560 |
container_title |
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute |
container_volume |
27 |
container_start_page |
154 |
op_container_end_page |
161 |
_version_ |
1772181781788753920 |