Количественная грамматика и поэтика личных форм глагола в “Гусли доброгласной” Симеона Полоцкого

The paper offers data on the quantity and structure of finite verbal forms in Simeon Polotsky’s collection Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia. The results are compared to data from twenty epinician odes by Mikhail Lomonosov and ten odes by Gavriil Derzhavin. We find 851 personal forms in Simeon’s collection, of wh...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Двинятин, Федор Никитич
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:unknown
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12528/269
id ftpolishasiss2:oai:ispan.waw.pl:20.500.12528/269
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpolishasiss2:oai:ispan.waw.pl:20.500.12528/269 2024-06-23T07:54:38+00:00 Количественная грамматика и поэтика личных форм глагола в “Гусли доброгласной” Симеона Полоцкого The Quantitative Grammar and Poetics of Finite Verb Forms in the Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia by Simeon Polotsky Двинятин, Федор Никитич 2015 application/pdf https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12528/269 other unknown Slověne, 1/2015, s. 159–169 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12528/269 “Гусль доброгласная" czasownik forma osobowa Symeon Połocki poetyka struktura tekstu język starorosyjski język cerkiewnosłowiański 17 w Simeon Polotsky verb finite verb form poetics text structure Old Russian language Church Slavonic 17th century Article 2015 ftpolishasiss2 https://doi.org/20.500.12528/269 2024-06-03T09:07:46Z The paper offers data on the quantity and structure of finite verbal forms in Simeon Polotsky’s collection Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia. The results are compared to data from twenty epinician odes by Mikhail Lomonosov and ten odes by Gavriil Derzhavin. We find 851 personal forms in Simeon’s collection, of which 214 belong to past tenses (73 to imperfect, 92 to aorist, 49 to past tense with l morpheme); 363 belong to present tense; 99 to future tense; 51 to imperative mood; 6 to conjunctive mood; and 118 to the forms with the da particle. The total percentage of past tenses in Simeon’s texts (25.1%) is close to the parameters appearing in Lomonosov’s and Derzhavin’s texts (21.4% and 23.5%, respectively), and the same is true for the percentages of non-indicative moods (20.5% vs. 19.1% and 20.5%). Simeon Polotsky’s texts contain fewer present tense forms than those written by the 18th-century poets (42.8% vs. 50.6% and 49.5%), but they contain more future tense forms (11.6% vs. 8.9% and 6.5%). Past tense forms in Simeon’s texts with l suffix include 29 forms of the third person with the auxiliary iestʹ verb, usually given in a rhyme position. In the aorist, the proportion of imperfective and perfective forms to the forms of the byti verb is 9:72:11; in imperfect, this proportion is 52:6:15; and in past tenses with l suffix, it is 8:38:3. We find 99 forms of the future tense, broken down as follows: 69 are forms of simple future; 12 are accompanied by imatʹ and similar forms; and 18 are accompanied by budet and similar forms (there is no semantic difference between these two last cases). Of the forms containing the da particle, 65 belong to present tense, 37 belong to future tense, and 16 are accompanied by byti forms. Article in Journal/Newspaper Mikhail Lomonosov Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences: iReteslaw
institution Open Polar
collection Institute of Slavic Studies, Polish Academy of Sciences: iReteslaw
op_collection_id ftpolishasiss2
language unknown
topic “Гусль доброгласная"
czasownik
forma osobowa
Symeon Połocki
poetyka
struktura tekstu
język starorosyjski
język cerkiewnosłowiański
17 w
Simeon Polotsky
verb
finite verb form
poetics
text structure
Old Russian language
Church Slavonic
17th century
spellingShingle “Гусль доброгласная"
czasownik
forma osobowa
Symeon Połocki
poetyka
struktura tekstu
język starorosyjski
język cerkiewnosłowiański
17 w
Simeon Polotsky
verb
finite verb form
poetics
text structure
Old Russian language
Church Slavonic
17th century
Двинятин, Федор Никитич
Количественная грамматика и поэтика личных форм глагола в “Гусли доброгласной” Симеона Полоцкого
topic_facet “Гусль доброгласная"
czasownik
forma osobowa
Symeon Połocki
poetyka
struktura tekstu
język starorosyjski
język cerkiewnosłowiański
17 w
Simeon Polotsky
verb
finite verb form
poetics
text structure
Old Russian language
Church Slavonic
17th century
description The paper offers data on the quantity and structure of finite verbal forms in Simeon Polotsky’s collection Guslʹ Dobroglasnaia. The results are compared to data from twenty epinician odes by Mikhail Lomonosov and ten odes by Gavriil Derzhavin. We find 851 personal forms in Simeon’s collection, of which 214 belong to past tenses (73 to imperfect, 92 to aorist, 49 to past tense with l morpheme); 363 belong to present tense; 99 to future tense; 51 to imperative mood; 6 to conjunctive mood; and 118 to the forms with the da particle. The total percentage of past tenses in Simeon’s texts (25.1%) is close to the parameters appearing in Lomonosov’s and Derzhavin’s texts (21.4% and 23.5%, respectively), and the same is true for the percentages of non-indicative moods (20.5% vs. 19.1% and 20.5%). Simeon Polotsky’s texts contain fewer present tense forms than those written by the 18th-century poets (42.8% vs. 50.6% and 49.5%), but they contain more future tense forms (11.6% vs. 8.9% and 6.5%). Past tense forms in Simeon’s texts with l suffix include 29 forms of the third person with the auxiliary iestʹ verb, usually given in a rhyme position. In the aorist, the proportion of imperfective and perfective forms to the forms of the byti verb is 9:72:11; in imperfect, this proportion is 52:6:15; and in past tenses with l suffix, it is 8:38:3. We find 99 forms of the future tense, broken down as follows: 69 are forms of simple future; 12 are accompanied by imatʹ and similar forms; and 18 are accompanied by budet and similar forms (there is no semantic difference between these two last cases). Of the forms containing the da particle, 65 belong to present tense, 37 belong to future tense, and 16 are accompanied by byti forms.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Двинятин, Федор Никитич
author_facet Двинятин, Федор Никитич
author_sort Двинятин, Федор Никитич
title Количественная грамматика и поэтика личных форм глагола в “Гусли доброгласной” Симеона Полоцкого
title_short Количественная грамматика и поэтика личных форм глагола в “Гусли доброгласной” Симеона Полоцкого
title_full Количественная грамматика и поэтика личных форм глагола в “Гусли доброгласной” Симеона Полоцкого
title_fullStr Количественная грамматика и поэтика личных форм глагола в “Гусли доброгласной” Симеона Полоцкого
title_full_unstemmed Количественная грамматика и поэтика личных форм глагола в “Гусли доброгласной” Симеона Полоцкого
title_sort количественная грамматика и поэтика личных форм глагола в “гусли доброгласной” симеона полоцкого
publishDate 2015
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12528/269
genre Mikhail Lomonosov
genre_facet Mikhail Lomonosov
op_relation Slověne, 1/2015, s. 159–169
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12528/269
op_doi https://doi.org/20.500.12528/269
_version_ 1802646858637508608