How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods

Accurate stock assessments for each of the dominant species of sand lances in the northeast Atlantic Ocean and adjacent areas are not available due to the lack of a reliable identification procedure; therefore, appropriate measures of fisheries management or conservation of sand lances cannot be imp...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:ZooKeys
Main Authors: Thiel,Ralf, Knebelsberger,Thomas
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2016
Subjects:
COI
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/8866/
id ftpensoft:10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpensoft:10.3897/zookeys.617.8866 2023-05-15T17:41:20+02:00 How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods Thiel,Ralf Knebelsberger,Thomas 2016 text/html https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866 https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/8866/ en eng Pensoft Publishers info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1313-2970 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1313-2989 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess ZooKeys 617: 139-164 Ammodytes COI DNA barcoding Hyperoplus meristic characters mitochondrial DNA morphology morphometrics northeast Atlantic nuclear gene Rhodopsin Sand lances species identification Research Article 2016 ftpensoft https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866 2022-03-01T12:33:15Z Accurate stock assessments for each of the dominant species of sand lances in the northeast Atlantic Ocean and adjacent areas are not available due to the lack of a reliable identification procedure; therefore, appropriate measures of fisheries management or conservation of sand lances cannot be implemented. In this study, detailed morphological and molecular features are assessed to discriminate between four species of sand lances belonging to the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus. Morphological characters described by earlier authors as useful for identification of the genera are confirmed, and two additional distinguishing characters are added. A combination of the following morphological characters is recommended to distinguish between the genera Hyperoplus and Ammodytes: the protrusibility of the premaxillae, the presence of hooked ends of the prevomer, the number of dermal plicae, and the pectoral-fin length as a percentage of the standard length. The discriminant function analysis revealed that morphometric data are not very useful to distinguish the species of each of the two genera. The following meristic characters improve the separation of H. lanceolatus from H. immaculatus: the number of lower arch gill rakers, total number of gill rakers, numbers of caudal vertebrae and total vertebrae, and numbers of dorsal-fin and anal-fin rays. It is confirmed that A. tobianus differs from A. marinus by its belly scales that are organised in tight chevrons, scales which are present over the musculature at the base of the caudal fin, as well as by the lower numbers of dermal plicae, dorsal-fin rays, and total vertebrae. In contrast to the morphological data, mitochondrial COI sequences (DNA barcodes) failed to separate unambiguously the four investigated species. Ammodytes tobianus and H. lanceolatus showed an overlap between intraspecific and interspecific K2P genetic distances and cannot be reliably distinguished using the common DNA barcoding approach. Ammodytes marinus and H. immaculatus exhibited gaps between intraspecific and interspecific K2P distances of 2.73 and 3.34% respectively, indicating that their DNA barcodes can be used for species identification. As an alternative, short nuclear Rhodopsin sequences were analysed and one diagnostic character was found for each of the species A. marinus, H. lanceolatus, and H. immaculatus. Ammodytes tobianus can be characterised by the lack of species-specific mutations when compared to the other three species. In contrast to COI, the short nuclear sequences represent a useful alternative for rapid species identification whenever an examination of morphological characters is not available. Article in Journal/Newspaper Northeast Atlantic Pensoft Publishers ZooKeys 617 139 164
institution Open Polar
collection Pensoft Publishers
op_collection_id ftpensoft
language English
topic Ammodytes
COI
DNA barcoding
Hyperoplus
meristic characters
mitochondrial DNA
morphology
morphometrics
northeast Atlantic
nuclear gene
Rhodopsin
Sand lances
species identification
spellingShingle Ammodytes
COI
DNA barcoding
Hyperoplus
meristic characters
mitochondrial DNA
morphology
morphometrics
northeast Atlantic
nuclear gene
Rhodopsin
Sand lances
species identification
Thiel,Ralf
Knebelsberger,Thomas
How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods
topic_facet Ammodytes
COI
DNA barcoding
Hyperoplus
meristic characters
mitochondrial DNA
morphology
morphometrics
northeast Atlantic
nuclear gene
Rhodopsin
Sand lances
species identification
description Accurate stock assessments for each of the dominant species of sand lances in the northeast Atlantic Ocean and adjacent areas are not available due to the lack of a reliable identification procedure; therefore, appropriate measures of fisheries management or conservation of sand lances cannot be implemented. In this study, detailed morphological and molecular features are assessed to discriminate between four species of sand lances belonging to the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus. Morphological characters described by earlier authors as useful for identification of the genera are confirmed, and two additional distinguishing characters are added. A combination of the following morphological characters is recommended to distinguish between the genera Hyperoplus and Ammodytes: the protrusibility of the premaxillae, the presence of hooked ends of the prevomer, the number of dermal plicae, and the pectoral-fin length as a percentage of the standard length. The discriminant function analysis revealed that morphometric data are not very useful to distinguish the species of each of the two genera. The following meristic characters improve the separation of H. lanceolatus from H. immaculatus: the number of lower arch gill rakers, total number of gill rakers, numbers of caudal vertebrae and total vertebrae, and numbers of dorsal-fin and anal-fin rays. It is confirmed that A. tobianus differs from A. marinus by its belly scales that are organised in tight chevrons, scales which are present over the musculature at the base of the caudal fin, as well as by the lower numbers of dermal plicae, dorsal-fin rays, and total vertebrae. In contrast to the morphological data, mitochondrial COI sequences (DNA barcodes) failed to separate unambiguously the four investigated species. Ammodytes tobianus and H. lanceolatus showed an overlap between intraspecific and interspecific K2P genetic distances and cannot be reliably distinguished using the common DNA barcoding approach. Ammodytes marinus and H. immaculatus exhibited gaps between intraspecific and interspecific K2P distances of 2.73 and 3.34% respectively, indicating that their DNA barcodes can be used for species identification. As an alternative, short nuclear Rhodopsin sequences were analysed and one diagnostic character was found for each of the species A. marinus, H. lanceolatus, and H. immaculatus. Ammodytes tobianus can be characterised by the lack of species-specific mutations when compared to the other three species. In contrast to COI, the short nuclear sequences represent a useful alternative for rapid species identification whenever an examination of morphological characters is not available.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Thiel,Ralf
Knebelsberger,Thomas
author_facet Thiel,Ralf
Knebelsberger,Thomas
author_sort Thiel,Ralf
title How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods
title_short How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods
title_full How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods
title_fullStr How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods
title_full_unstemmed How reliably can northeast Atlantic sand lances of the genera Ammodytes and Hyperoplus be distinguished? A comparative application of morphological and molecular methods
title_sort how reliably can northeast atlantic sand lances of the genera ammodytes and hyperoplus be distinguished? a comparative application of morphological and molecular methods
publisher Pensoft Publishers
publishDate 2016
url https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
https://zookeys.pensoft.net/article/8866/
genre Northeast Atlantic
genre_facet Northeast Atlantic
op_source ZooKeys 617: 139-164
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1313-2970
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1313-2989
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.617.8866
container_title ZooKeys
container_volume 617
container_start_page 139
op_container_end_page 164
_version_ 1766142828210028544