Economic costs of biological invasions in Ecuador: the importance of the Galapagos Islands

Biological invasions, as a result of human intervention through trade and mobility, are the second biggest cause of biodiversity loss. The impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) on the environment are well known, however, economic impacts are poorly estimated, especially in mega-diverse countries w...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:NeoBiota
Main Authors: Ballesteros Mejia,Liliana, Angulo,Elena, Diagne,Christophe, Cooke,Brian, Nuñez,Martín, Courchamp,Franck
Format: Review
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.59116
https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/59116/
id ftpensoft:10.3897/neobiota.67.59116
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpensoft:10.3897/neobiota.67.59116 2023-05-15T18:05:44+02:00 Economic costs of biological invasions in Ecuador: the importance of the Galapagos Islands Ballesteros Mejia,Liliana Angulo,Elena Diagne,Christophe Cooke,Brian Nuñez,Martín Courchamp,Franck 2021 text/html https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.59116 https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/59116/ en eng Pensoft Publishers info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1314-2488 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1619-0033 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess NeoBiota 67: 375-400 Damages economic costs InvaCost invasive alien species mainland Ecuador management Review Article 2021 ftpensoft https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.59116 2022-03-01T12:48:12Z Biological invasions, as a result of human intervention through trade and mobility, are the second biggest cause of biodiversity loss. The impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) on the environment are well known, however, economic impacts are poorly estimated, especially in mega-diverse countries where both economic and ecological consequences of these effects can be catastrophic. Ecuador, one of the smallest mega-diverse countries, lacks a comprehensive description of the economic costs of IAS within its territory. Here, using "InvaCost", a public database that compiles all recorded monetary costs associated with IAS from English and Non-English sources, we investigated the economic costs of biological invasions. We found that between 1983 and 2017, the reported costs associated with biological invasions ranged between US$86.17 million (when considering only the most robust data) and US$626 million (when including all cost data) belonging to 37 species and 27 genera. Furthermore, 99% of the recorded cost entries were from the Galapagos Islands. From only robust data, the costliest identified taxonomic group was feral goats (Capra hircus; US$20 million), followed by Aedes mosquitoes (US$2.14 million) while organisms like plant species from the genus Rubus, a parasitic fly (Philornis downsi), black rats (Rattus rattus) and terrestrial gastropods (Achatina fulica) represented less than US$2 million each. Costs of "mixed-taxa" (i.e. plants and animals) represented the highest (61% of total robust costs; US$52.44 million). The most impacted activity sector was the national park authorities, which spent about US$84 million. Results from robust data also revealed that management expenditures were the major type of costs recorded in the Galapagos Islands; however, costs reported for medical losses related to Aedes mosquitoes causing dengue fever in mainland Ecuador would have ranked first if more detailed information had allowed us to categorize them as robust data. Over 70% of the IAS reported for Ecuador did not have reported costs. These results suggest that costs reported here are a massive underestimate of the actual economic toll of invasions in the country. Review Rattus rattus Pensoft Publishers Galapagos NeoBiota 67 375 400
institution Open Polar
collection Pensoft Publishers
op_collection_id ftpensoft
language English
topic Damages
economic costs
InvaCost
invasive alien species
mainland Ecuador
management
spellingShingle Damages
economic costs
InvaCost
invasive alien species
mainland Ecuador
management
Ballesteros Mejia,Liliana
Angulo,Elena
Diagne,Christophe
Cooke,Brian
Nuñez,Martín
Courchamp,Franck
Economic costs of biological invasions in Ecuador: the importance of the Galapagos Islands
topic_facet Damages
economic costs
InvaCost
invasive alien species
mainland Ecuador
management
description Biological invasions, as a result of human intervention through trade and mobility, are the second biggest cause of biodiversity loss. The impacts of invasive alien species (IAS) on the environment are well known, however, economic impacts are poorly estimated, especially in mega-diverse countries where both economic and ecological consequences of these effects can be catastrophic. Ecuador, one of the smallest mega-diverse countries, lacks a comprehensive description of the economic costs of IAS within its territory. Here, using "InvaCost", a public database that compiles all recorded monetary costs associated with IAS from English and Non-English sources, we investigated the economic costs of biological invasions. We found that between 1983 and 2017, the reported costs associated with biological invasions ranged between US$86.17 million (when considering only the most robust data) and US$626 million (when including all cost data) belonging to 37 species and 27 genera. Furthermore, 99% of the recorded cost entries were from the Galapagos Islands. From only robust data, the costliest identified taxonomic group was feral goats (Capra hircus; US$20 million), followed by Aedes mosquitoes (US$2.14 million) while organisms like plant species from the genus Rubus, a parasitic fly (Philornis downsi), black rats (Rattus rattus) and terrestrial gastropods (Achatina fulica) represented less than US$2 million each. Costs of "mixed-taxa" (i.e. plants and animals) represented the highest (61% of total robust costs; US$52.44 million). The most impacted activity sector was the national park authorities, which spent about US$84 million. Results from robust data also revealed that management expenditures were the major type of costs recorded in the Galapagos Islands; however, costs reported for medical losses related to Aedes mosquitoes causing dengue fever in mainland Ecuador would have ranked first if more detailed information had allowed us to categorize them as robust data. Over 70% of the IAS reported for Ecuador did not have reported costs. These results suggest that costs reported here are a massive underestimate of the actual economic toll of invasions in the country.
format Review
author Ballesteros Mejia,Liliana
Angulo,Elena
Diagne,Christophe
Cooke,Brian
Nuñez,Martín
Courchamp,Franck
author_facet Ballesteros Mejia,Liliana
Angulo,Elena
Diagne,Christophe
Cooke,Brian
Nuñez,Martín
Courchamp,Franck
author_sort Ballesteros Mejia,Liliana
title Economic costs of biological invasions in Ecuador: the importance of the Galapagos Islands
title_short Economic costs of biological invasions in Ecuador: the importance of the Galapagos Islands
title_full Economic costs of biological invasions in Ecuador: the importance of the Galapagos Islands
title_fullStr Economic costs of biological invasions in Ecuador: the importance of the Galapagos Islands
title_full_unstemmed Economic costs of biological invasions in Ecuador: the importance of the Galapagos Islands
title_sort economic costs of biological invasions in ecuador: the importance of the galapagos islands
publisher Pensoft Publishers
publishDate 2021
url https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.59116
https://neobiota.pensoft.net/article/59116/
geographic Galapagos
geographic_facet Galapagos
genre Rattus rattus
genre_facet Rattus rattus
op_source NeoBiota 67: 375-400
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1314-2488
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1619-0033
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3897/neobiota.67.59116
container_title NeoBiota
container_volume 67
container_start_page 375
op_container_end_page 400
_version_ 1766177248277168128