Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia

At the start of the third millennium, new opportunities have arisen in biogeographical research, namely in the generalisation, visualisation and cross-spectrum analysis of biological and geographical information and in the compilation of biogeographical maps and innovative models for regions that di...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nature Conservation
Main Authors: Romanov,Alexey, Koroleva,Elena, Dikareva,Tatiana
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711
https://natureconservation.pensoft.net/article/10711/
id ftpensoft:10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpensoft:10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 2023-05-15T18:28:24+02:00 Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia Romanov,Alexey Koroleva,Elena Dikareva,Tatiana 2017 text/html https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 https://natureconservation.pensoft.net/article/10711/ en eng Pensoft Publishers info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1314-3301 info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1314-6947 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess Nature Conservation 22: 191-218 biodiversity biogeographical mapping monitoring wildlife conservation Research Article 2017 ftpensoft https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711 2022-03-01T12:35:39Z At the start of the third millennium, new opportunities have arisen in biogeographical research, namely in the generalisation, visualisation and cross-spectrum analysis of biological and geographical information and in the compilation of biogeographical maps and innovative models for regions that differ in the availability of distribution data. These tasks include long-term monitoring of plants and animals which are in danger of extinction, geographical analysis of biodiversity distribution and development of effective wildlife conservation strategies for specific regions. The studies of the Department of Biogeography of Moscow University on geography and biodiversity conservation are based on long-term field expeditions. The examples of the Asian Subarctic Mountains, the steppes of Central Kazakhstan and the urbanised north-west of Russia are used to illustrate Russian approaches to the use of biogeographical monitoring for the identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation. The species populations of the higher plants and vertebrates listed in the Red Books have been considered as the basic units of biodiversity. Article in Journal/Newspaper Subarctic Pensoft Publishers Nature Conservation 22 191 218
institution Open Polar
collection Pensoft Publishers
op_collection_id ftpensoft
language English
topic biodiversity
biogeographical mapping
monitoring
wildlife conservation
spellingShingle biodiversity
biogeographical mapping
monitoring
wildlife conservation
Romanov,Alexey
Koroleva,Elena
Dikareva,Tatiana
Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
topic_facet biodiversity
biogeographical mapping
monitoring
wildlife conservation
description At the start of the third millennium, new opportunities have arisen in biogeographical research, namely in the generalisation, visualisation and cross-spectrum analysis of biological and geographical information and in the compilation of biogeographical maps and innovative models for regions that differ in the availability of distribution data. These tasks include long-term monitoring of plants and animals which are in danger of extinction, geographical analysis of biodiversity distribution and development of effective wildlife conservation strategies for specific regions. The studies of the Department of Biogeography of Moscow University on geography and biodiversity conservation are based on long-term field expeditions. The examples of the Asian Subarctic Mountains, the steppes of Central Kazakhstan and the urbanised north-west of Russia are used to illustrate Russian approaches to the use of biogeographical monitoring for the identification of priority areas for biodiversity conservation. The species populations of the higher plants and vertebrates listed in the Red Books have been considered as the basic units of biodiversity.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Romanov,Alexey
Koroleva,Elena
Dikareva,Tatiana
author_facet Romanov,Alexey
Koroleva,Elena
Dikareva,Tatiana
author_sort Romanov,Alexey
title Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
title_short Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
title_full Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
title_fullStr Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
title_full_unstemmed Integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: Case studies from the Palearctic of Russia
title_sort integration of species and ecosystem monitoring for selecting priority areas for biodiversity conservation: case studies from the palearctic of russia
publisher Pensoft Publishers
publishDate 2017
url https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711
https://natureconservation.pensoft.net/article/10711/
genre Subarctic
genre_facet Subarctic
op_source Nature Conservation 22: 191-218
op_relation info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/eissn/1314-3301
info:eu-repo/semantics/altIdentifier/pissn/1314-6947
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.22.10711
container_title Nature Conservation
container_volume 22
container_start_page 191
op_container_end_page 218
_version_ 1766210866748850176