Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology
Both genetic and environmental factors affect the morphology of oysters. Molecular identification is currently the primary means of species identification, but it is inconvenient and costly. In this study, we assessed the ability of geometric morphometric (GM) methods to identify two species of oyst...
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article in Journal/Newspaper |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Pensoft Publishers
2023
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045 https://preprints.arphahub.com/article/116045/ |
id |
ftpensoft:10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftpensoft:10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045 2023-12-24T10:16:07+01:00 Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology Liu,Qian Guo,Yuepeng Yang,Yanzhuo Mao,Junxia Wang,Xubo Tian,Ying Hao,Zhenlin 2023 text/html https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045 https://preprints.arphahub.com/article/116045/ en eng Pensoft Publishers info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC BY 4.0 ARPHA Preprints traditional morphometrics geometric morphometrics Pacific oyster Research Article 2023 ftpensoft https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045 2023-11-28T01:07:05Z Both genetic and environmental factors affect the morphology of oysters. Molecular identification is currently the primary means of species identification, but it is inconvenient and costly. In this study, we assessed the ability of geometric morphometric (GM) methods to identify two species of oysters (Crassostrea gigas and C. ariakensis). We used traditional morphometric and GM methods, including principal component analysis (PCA), thin-plate spline analysis (TPS), and canonical variable analysis (CVA), to identify specific features that distinguish the two species. We found that differences in shape can be visualized using GM methods. The Procrustes analysis revealed significant differences in shell morphology between C. gigas and C. ariakensis. The shells of C. ariakensis are more prominent at the widest point and are more scattered and have a greater variety of shapes. The shells of C. gigas are more oval in shape. PCA results indicated that PC1 explained 45.22%, PC2 explained 22.09%, and PC3 explained 10.98% of the variation between the two populations, which suggests that the main morphological differences are concentrated in these three principal components. Combining the TPS analysis function plots showed that the shell shape of C. ariakensis is mainly elongated and spindle-shaped, whereas the shell shape of C. gigas is more oval. The CVA results showed that the classification rate for the two populations reached 100% which means that C. ariakensis and C. gigas have distinct differences in shell morphology and can be completely separated based on morphological characteristics. Through these methods, a more comprehensive understanding of the morphological characteristics of different oyster populations can be obtained, providing a reference for oyster classification and identification. Article in Journal/Newspaper Crassostrea gigas Pacific oyster Pensoft Publishers Pacific |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
Pensoft Publishers |
op_collection_id |
ftpensoft |
language |
English |
topic |
traditional morphometrics geometric morphometrics Pacific oyster |
spellingShingle |
traditional morphometrics geometric morphometrics Pacific oyster Liu,Qian Guo,Yuepeng Yang,Yanzhuo Mao,Junxia Wang,Xubo Tian,Ying Hao,Zhenlin Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology |
topic_facet |
traditional morphometrics geometric morphometrics Pacific oyster |
description |
Both genetic and environmental factors affect the morphology of oysters. Molecular identification is currently the primary means of species identification, but it is inconvenient and costly. In this study, we assessed the ability of geometric morphometric (GM) methods to identify two species of oysters (Crassostrea gigas and C. ariakensis). We used traditional morphometric and GM methods, including principal component analysis (PCA), thin-plate spline analysis (TPS), and canonical variable analysis (CVA), to identify specific features that distinguish the two species. We found that differences in shape can be visualized using GM methods. The Procrustes analysis revealed significant differences in shell morphology between C. gigas and C. ariakensis. The shells of C. ariakensis are more prominent at the widest point and are more scattered and have a greater variety of shapes. The shells of C. gigas are more oval in shape. PCA results indicated that PC1 explained 45.22%, PC2 explained 22.09%, and PC3 explained 10.98% of the variation between the two populations, which suggests that the main morphological differences are concentrated in these three principal components. Combining the TPS analysis function plots showed that the shell shape of C. ariakensis is mainly elongated and spindle-shaped, whereas the shell shape of C. gigas is more oval. The CVA results showed that the classification rate for the two populations reached 100% which means that C. ariakensis and C. gigas have distinct differences in shell morphology and can be completely separated based on morphological characteristics. Through these methods, a more comprehensive understanding of the morphological characteristics of different oyster populations can be obtained, providing a reference for oyster classification and identification. |
format |
Article in Journal/Newspaper |
author |
Liu,Qian Guo,Yuepeng Yang,Yanzhuo Mao,Junxia Wang,Xubo Tian,Ying Hao,Zhenlin |
author_facet |
Liu,Qian Guo,Yuepeng Yang,Yanzhuo Mao,Junxia Wang,Xubo Tian,Ying Hao,Zhenlin |
author_sort |
Liu,Qian |
title |
Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology |
title_short |
Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology |
title_full |
Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology |
title_fullStr |
Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology |
title_full_unstemmed |
Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology |
title_sort |
geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology |
publisher |
Pensoft Publishers |
publishDate |
2023 |
url |
https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045 https://preprints.arphahub.com/article/116045/ |
geographic |
Pacific |
geographic_facet |
Pacific |
genre |
Crassostrea gigas Pacific oyster |
genre_facet |
Crassostrea gigas Pacific oyster |
op_source |
ARPHA Preprints |
op_rights |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC BY 4.0 |
op_doi |
https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045 |
_version_ |
1786203433942908928 |