Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology

Both genetic and environmental factors affect the morphology of oysters. Molecular identification is currently the primary means of species identification, but it is inconvenient and costly. In this study, we assessed the ability of geometric morphometric (GM) methods to identify two species of oyst...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Liu,Qian, Guo,Yuepeng, Yang,Yanzhuo, Mao,Junxia, Wang,Xubo, Tian,Ying, Hao,Zhenlin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Pensoft Publishers 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045
https://preprints.arphahub.com/article/116045/
id ftpensoft:10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpensoft:10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045 2023-12-24T10:16:07+01:00 Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology Liu,Qian Guo,Yuepeng Yang,Yanzhuo Mao,Junxia Wang,Xubo Tian,Ying Hao,Zhenlin 2023 text/html https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045 https://preprints.arphahub.com/article/116045/ en eng Pensoft Publishers info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC BY 4.0 ARPHA Preprints traditional morphometrics geometric morphometrics Pacific oyster Research Article 2023 ftpensoft https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045 2023-11-28T01:07:05Z Both genetic and environmental factors affect the morphology of oysters. Molecular identification is currently the primary means of species identification, but it is inconvenient and costly. In this study, we assessed the ability of geometric morphometric (GM) methods to identify two species of oysters (Crassostrea gigas and C. ariakensis). We used traditional morphometric and GM methods, including principal component analysis (PCA), thin-plate spline analysis (TPS), and canonical variable analysis (CVA), to identify specific features that distinguish the two species. We found that differences in shape can be visualized using GM methods. The Procrustes analysis revealed significant differences in shell morphology between C. gigas and C. ariakensis. The shells of C. ariakensis are more prominent at the widest point and are more scattered and have a greater variety of shapes. The shells of C. gigas are more oval in shape. PCA results indicated that PC1 explained 45.22%, PC2 explained 22.09%, and PC3 explained 10.98% of the variation between the two populations, which suggests that the main morphological differences are concentrated in these three principal components. Combining the TPS analysis function plots showed that the shell shape of C. ariakensis is mainly elongated and spindle-shaped, whereas the shell shape of C. gigas is more oval. The CVA results showed that the classification rate for the two populations reached 100% which means that C. ariakensis and C. gigas have distinct differences in shell morphology and can be completely separated based on morphological characteristics. Through these methods, a more comprehensive understanding of the morphological characteristics of different oyster populations can be obtained, providing a reference for oyster classification and identification. Article in Journal/Newspaper Crassostrea gigas Pacific oyster Pensoft Publishers Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection Pensoft Publishers
op_collection_id ftpensoft
language English
topic traditional morphometrics
geometric morphometrics
Pacific oyster
spellingShingle traditional morphometrics
geometric morphometrics
Pacific oyster
Liu,Qian
Guo,Yuepeng
Yang,Yanzhuo
Mao,Junxia
Wang,Xubo
Tian,Ying
Hao,Zhenlin
Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology
topic_facet traditional morphometrics
geometric morphometrics
Pacific oyster
description Both genetic and environmental factors affect the morphology of oysters. Molecular identification is currently the primary means of species identification, but it is inconvenient and costly. In this study, we assessed the ability of geometric morphometric (GM) methods to identify two species of oysters (Crassostrea gigas and C. ariakensis). We used traditional morphometric and GM methods, including principal component analysis (PCA), thin-plate spline analysis (TPS), and canonical variable analysis (CVA), to identify specific features that distinguish the two species. We found that differences in shape can be visualized using GM methods. The Procrustes analysis revealed significant differences in shell morphology between C. gigas and C. ariakensis. The shells of C. ariakensis are more prominent at the widest point and are more scattered and have a greater variety of shapes. The shells of C. gigas are more oval in shape. PCA results indicated that PC1 explained 45.22%, PC2 explained 22.09%, and PC3 explained 10.98% of the variation between the two populations, which suggests that the main morphological differences are concentrated in these three principal components. Combining the TPS analysis function plots showed that the shell shape of C. ariakensis is mainly elongated and spindle-shaped, whereas the shell shape of C. gigas is more oval. The CVA results showed that the classification rate for the two populations reached 100% which means that C. ariakensis and C. gigas have distinct differences in shell morphology and can be completely separated based on morphological characteristics. Through these methods, a more comprehensive understanding of the morphological characteristics of different oyster populations can be obtained, providing a reference for oyster classification and identification.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Liu,Qian
Guo,Yuepeng
Yang,Yanzhuo
Mao,Junxia
Wang,Xubo
Tian,Ying
Hao,Zhenlin
author_facet Liu,Qian
Guo,Yuepeng
Yang,Yanzhuo
Mao,Junxia
Wang,Xubo
Tian,Ying
Hao,Zhenlin
author_sort Liu,Qian
title Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology
title_short Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology
title_full Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology
title_fullStr Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology
title_full_unstemmed Geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology
title_sort geometric morphometric methods for identification of oyster species based on morphology
publisher Pensoft Publishers
publishDate 2023
url https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045
https://preprints.arphahub.com/article/116045/
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre Crassostrea gigas
Pacific oyster
genre_facet Crassostrea gigas
Pacific oyster
op_source ARPHA Preprints
op_rights info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
CC BY 4.0
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3897/arphapreprints.e116045
_version_ 1786203433942908928