The Opportunity Costs of Ignoring the Law of Sea Convention in the Arctic
The paper begins by briefly surveying the extent to which the convention’s provisions intersect with United States interests in the Arctic. Not surprisingly, there is extensive overlap. The paper then reviews arguments that UNCLOS is irrelevant or even antithetical to achieving these important U.S....
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Text |
Language: | unknown |
Published: |
Penn State Law eLibrary
2013
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/fac_works/239 https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1240&context=fac_works |
id |
ftpennstateuni:oai:elibrary.law.psu.edu:fac_works-1240 |
---|---|
record_format |
openpolar |
spelling |
ftpennstateuni:oai:elibrary.law.psu.edu:fac_works-1240 2023-05-15T14:35:29+02:00 The Opportunity Costs of Ignoring the Law of Sea Convention in the Arctic Houck, James W. 2013-01-01T08:00:00Z application/pdf https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/fac_works/239 https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1240&context=fac_works unknown Penn State Law eLibrary https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/fac_works/239 https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1240&context=fac_works Journal Articles arctic law of the sea UNCLOS text 2013 ftpennstateuni 2022-03-14T20:34:56Z The paper begins by briefly surveying the extent to which the convention’s provisions intersect with United States interests in the Arctic. Not surprisingly, there is extensive overlap. The paper then reviews arguments that UNCLOS is irrelevant or even antithetical to achieving these important U.S. interests. After critiquing the anti-UNCLOS arguments, the paper examines the case for UNCLOS. The paper focuses in particular on U.S. interests on the Arctic seafloor, arguing that these interests are extensive and that accession would help avert a wide range of potential political, legal, and regulatory challenges from foreign governments and corporations. The possibility of such challenges creates political and legal uncertainty as long as the United States remains outside the convention and provides a bona fide disincentive for U.S.-licensed corporations to undertake the type of exploration and development activities necessary to realize a host of offshore benefits. Moreover, by staying outside UNCLOS, the United States is forfeiting an opportunity to reinforce a favorable Arctic legal regime that could face pressure from non-Arctic nations in the future. The paper concludes by recommending that the U.S. accede to UNCLOS at the soonest opportunity. Text Arctic Law of the Sea PennState, The Dickinson School of Law: Penn State Law eLibrary Arctic |
institution |
Open Polar |
collection |
PennState, The Dickinson School of Law: Penn State Law eLibrary |
op_collection_id |
ftpennstateuni |
language |
unknown |
topic |
arctic law of the sea UNCLOS |
spellingShingle |
arctic law of the sea UNCLOS Houck, James W. The Opportunity Costs of Ignoring the Law of Sea Convention in the Arctic |
topic_facet |
arctic law of the sea UNCLOS |
description |
The paper begins by briefly surveying the extent to which the convention’s provisions intersect with United States interests in the Arctic. Not surprisingly, there is extensive overlap. The paper then reviews arguments that UNCLOS is irrelevant or even antithetical to achieving these important U.S. interests. After critiquing the anti-UNCLOS arguments, the paper examines the case for UNCLOS. The paper focuses in particular on U.S. interests on the Arctic seafloor, arguing that these interests are extensive and that accession would help avert a wide range of potential political, legal, and regulatory challenges from foreign governments and corporations. The possibility of such challenges creates political and legal uncertainty as long as the United States remains outside the convention and provides a bona fide disincentive for U.S.-licensed corporations to undertake the type of exploration and development activities necessary to realize a host of offshore benefits. Moreover, by staying outside UNCLOS, the United States is forfeiting an opportunity to reinforce a favorable Arctic legal regime that could face pressure from non-Arctic nations in the future. The paper concludes by recommending that the U.S. accede to UNCLOS at the soonest opportunity. |
format |
Text |
author |
Houck, James W. |
author_facet |
Houck, James W. |
author_sort |
Houck, James W. |
title |
The Opportunity Costs of Ignoring the Law of Sea Convention in the Arctic |
title_short |
The Opportunity Costs of Ignoring the Law of Sea Convention in the Arctic |
title_full |
The Opportunity Costs of Ignoring the Law of Sea Convention in the Arctic |
title_fullStr |
The Opportunity Costs of Ignoring the Law of Sea Convention in the Arctic |
title_full_unstemmed |
The Opportunity Costs of Ignoring the Law of Sea Convention in the Arctic |
title_sort |
opportunity costs of ignoring the law of sea convention in the arctic |
publisher |
Penn State Law eLibrary |
publishDate |
2013 |
url |
https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/fac_works/239 https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1240&context=fac_works |
geographic |
Arctic |
geographic_facet |
Arctic |
genre |
Arctic Law of the Sea |
genre_facet |
Arctic Law of the Sea |
op_source |
Journal Articles |
op_relation |
https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/fac_works/239 https://elibrary.law.psu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1240&context=fac_works |
_version_ |
1766308302122123264 |