Factors controlling black carbon distribution in the Arctic

• Published in: Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
• Main Authors: Qi, Ling, Li, Qinbin, Li, Yinrui, He, Cenlin
• Other Authors: Qi, L (reprint author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.; Qi, L (reprint author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Joint Inst Reg Earth Syst Sci & Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA., Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Atmospher & Ocean Sci, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA., Univ Calif Los Angeles, Joint Inst Reg Earth Syst Sci & Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA., Peking Univ, Sch Phys, Beijing, Peoples R China., Univ Illinois, Dept Atmospher Sci, Champaign, IL USA., Qi, L (reprint author), Univ Calif Los Angeles, Joint Inst Reg Earth Syst Sci & Engn, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA.
• Format: Journal/Newspaper
• Language: English
• Published: ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS 2017
• Subjects: DRY DEPOSITION VELOCITIES; LIGHT-ABSORBING PARTICLES; GREENLAND ICE-SHEET; MIXED-PHASE CLOUDS; LONG-TERM TRENDS; CLIMATE MODEL; SEA-ICE; SCAVENGING EFFICIENCIES; TIBETAN PLATEAU; ATMOSPHERIC TRANSPORT; Arctic; Greenland; black carbon; Extreme North of Russia; Ice Sheet; Sea ice
• Online Access: https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/475614; https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-17-1037-2017

We investigate the sensitivity of black carbon (BC) in the Arctic, including BC concentration in snow (BCsnow, ng g(-1)) and surface air (BCair, n gm(-3)), as well as emissions, dry deposition, and wet scavenging using the global three-dimensional (3-D) chemical transport model (CTM) GEOS-Chem. We find that the model underestimates BCsnow in the Arctic by 40% on average (median = 11.8 ng g(-1)). Natural gas flaring substantially increases total BC emissions in the Arctic (by similar to 70 %). The flaring emissions lead to up to 49% increases (0.1-8.5 ng g(-1)) in Arctic BCsnow, dramatically improving model comparison with observations (50% reduction in discrepancy) near flaring source regions (the western side of the extreme north of Russia). Ample observations suggest that BC dry deposition velocities over snow and ice in current CTMs (0.03 cm s(-1) in the GEOS-Chem) are too small. We apply the resistance-in-series method to compute a dry deposition velocity (v(d))/that varies with local meteorological and surface conditions. The resulting velocity is significantly larger and varies by a factor of 8 in the Arctic (0.03-0.24 cm s(-1)), which increases the fraction of dry to total BC deposition (16 to 25 %) yet leaves the total BC deposition and BCsnow in the Arctic unchanged. This is largely explained by the offsetting higher dry and lower wet deposition fluxes. Additionally, we account for the effect of the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen (WBF) process in mixed-phase clouds, which releases BC particles from condensed phases (water drops and ice crystals) back to the interstitial air and thereby substantially reduces the scavenging efficiency of clouds for BC (by 43-76% in the Arctic). The resulting BCsnow is up to 80% higher, BC loading is considerably larger (from 0.25 to 0.43mg m(-2)), and BC lifetime is markedly prolonged (from 9 to 16 days) in the Arctic. Overall, flaring emissions increase BCair in the Arctic (by similar to 20 ng m(-3)), the updated vd more than halves BCair (by similar to 20 ngm(-3)), and the WBF effect increases BCair by 25-70% during winter and early spring. The resulting model simulation of BCsnow is substantially improved (within 10% of the observations) and the discrepancies of BCair are much smaller during the snow season at Barrow, Alert, and Summit (from 67-47% to 46-3 %). Our results point toward an urgent need for better characterization of flaring emissions of BC (e.g., the emission factors, temporal, and spatial distribution), extensive measurements of both the dry deposition of BC over snow and ice, and the scavenging efficiency of BC in mixed-phase clouds. In addition, we find that the poorly constrained precipitation in the Arctic may introduce large uncertainties in estimating BCsnow. Doubling precipitation introduces a positive bias approximately as large as the overall effects of flaring emissions and the WBF effect; halving precipitation produces a similarly large negative bias. NASA from the Atmospheric Chemistry Modeling and Analysis Program (ACMAP) [NNX14AF11G]; Swedish Environmental Protection Agency; Swedish Research Council SCI(E) ARTICLE 2 1037-1059 17