Current plate velocities relative to hotspots: implications for hotspot motion, mantle viscosity and global reference frame

The HS2-NUVEL1 model being used for current plate velocities relative to hotspots is shown to be generally inconsistent with the observed hotspot data sampled from non-Pacific regions. Instead, we determine the T22A model, which provides a good and consistent fit to the trends of globally distribute...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Earth and Planetary Science Letters
Main Authors: Wang, SM, Wang, R
Other Authors: Wang, SM (reprint author), Peking Univ, Dept Geophys, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China., Peking Univ, Dept Geophys, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
Format: Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: earth and planetary science letters 2001
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/155462
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00351-X
id ftpekinguniv:oai:localhost:20.500.11897/155462
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpekinguniv:oai:localhost:20.500.11897/155462 2023-05-15T13:43:50+02:00 Current plate velocities relative to hotspots: implications for hotspot motion, mantle viscosity and global reference frame Wang, SM Wang, R Wang, SM (reprint author), Peking Univ, Dept Geophys, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China. Peking Univ, Dept Geophys, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China. 2001 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/155462 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00351-X en eng earth and planetary science letters EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS.2001,189,(3-4),133-140. 776027 0012-821X http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/155462 doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00351-X WOS:000169902700003 SCI hot spots plate tectonics mantle convection viscosity models SEISMIC EVIDENCE ATLANTIC HOTSPOTS CONVECTION PLUMES HAWAIIAN HOTSPOT POLAR WANDER PACIFIC SCALE ANTARCTICA KINEMATICS TECTONICS Journal 2001 ftpekinguniv https://doi.org/20.500.11897/155462 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00351-X 2021-08-01T08:02:38Z The HS2-NUVEL1 model being used for current plate velocities relative to hotspots is shown to be generally inconsistent with the observed hotspot data sampled from non-Pacific regions. Instead, we determine the T22A model, which provides a good and consistent fit to the trends of globally distributed hotspot traces, but predicts plate velocities at hotspots systematically lower than the observed rates of hotspot volcanic migrations. As a result, it implies that the return flow in the lower mantle has a velocity about 1/4 of the plate velocity, and that the lower mantle is about 20 times more viscous than the upper mantle. Although hotspots are not relatively fixed, they do define a global reference frame for plate motion and mantle convection. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Geochemistry & Geophysics SCI(E) 22 ARTICLE 3-4 133-140 189 Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctica Peking University Institutional Repository (PKU IR) Pacific Earth and Planetary Science Letters 189 3-4 133 140
institution Open Polar
collection Peking University Institutional Repository (PKU IR)
op_collection_id ftpekinguniv
language English
topic hot spots
plate tectonics
mantle
convection
viscosity
models
SEISMIC EVIDENCE
ATLANTIC HOTSPOTS
CONVECTION PLUMES
HAWAIIAN HOTSPOT
POLAR WANDER
PACIFIC
SCALE
ANTARCTICA
KINEMATICS
TECTONICS
spellingShingle hot spots
plate tectonics
mantle
convection
viscosity
models
SEISMIC EVIDENCE
ATLANTIC HOTSPOTS
CONVECTION PLUMES
HAWAIIAN HOTSPOT
POLAR WANDER
PACIFIC
SCALE
ANTARCTICA
KINEMATICS
TECTONICS
Wang, SM
Wang, R
Current plate velocities relative to hotspots: implications for hotspot motion, mantle viscosity and global reference frame
topic_facet hot spots
plate tectonics
mantle
convection
viscosity
models
SEISMIC EVIDENCE
ATLANTIC HOTSPOTS
CONVECTION PLUMES
HAWAIIAN HOTSPOT
POLAR WANDER
PACIFIC
SCALE
ANTARCTICA
KINEMATICS
TECTONICS
description The HS2-NUVEL1 model being used for current plate velocities relative to hotspots is shown to be generally inconsistent with the observed hotspot data sampled from non-Pacific regions. Instead, we determine the T22A model, which provides a good and consistent fit to the trends of globally distributed hotspot traces, but predicts plate velocities at hotspots systematically lower than the observed rates of hotspot volcanic migrations. As a result, it implies that the return flow in the lower mantle has a velocity about 1/4 of the plate velocity, and that the lower mantle is about 20 times more viscous than the upper mantle. Although hotspots are not relatively fixed, they do define a global reference frame for plate motion and mantle convection. (C) 2001 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved. Geochemistry & Geophysics SCI(E) 22 ARTICLE 3-4 133-140 189
author2 Wang, SM (reprint author), Peking Univ, Dept Geophys, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
Peking Univ, Dept Geophys, Beijing 100871, Peoples R China.
format Journal/Newspaper
author Wang, SM
Wang, R
author_facet Wang, SM
Wang, R
author_sort Wang, SM
title Current plate velocities relative to hotspots: implications for hotspot motion, mantle viscosity and global reference frame
title_short Current plate velocities relative to hotspots: implications for hotspot motion, mantle viscosity and global reference frame
title_full Current plate velocities relative to hotspots: implications for hotspot motion, mantle viscosity and global reference frame
title_fullStr Current plate velocities relative to hotspots: implications for hotspot motion, mantle viscosity and global reference frame
title_full_unstemmed Current plate velocities relative to hotspots: implications for hotspot motion, mantle viscosity and global reference frame
title_sort current plate velocities relative to hotspots: implications for hotspot motion, mantle viscosity and global reference frame
publisher earth and planetary science letters
publishDate 2001
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/155462
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00351-X
geographic Pacific
geographic_facet Pacific
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
op_source SCI
op_relation EARTH AND PLANETARY SCIENCE LETTERS.2001,189,(3-4),133-140.
776027
0012-821X
http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.11897/155462
doi:10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00351-X
WOS:000169902700003
op_doi https://doi.org/20.500.11897/155462
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00351-X
container_title Earth and Planetary Science Letters
container_volume 189
container_issue 3-4
container_start_page 133
op_container_end_page 140
_version_ 1766193870096302080