(Table 1) Comparison of dive duration and speed of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) equipped with internal and external devices

Bio-logging studies suffer from the lack of real controls. However, it is still possible to compare indirect parameters between control and equipped animals to assess the level of global disturbance due to instrumentation. In addition, it is also possible to compare the behaviour of free-ranging ani...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Beaulieu, Michaël, Ropert-Coudert, Yan, Le Maho, Yvon, Ancel, André
Format: Dataset
Language:English
Published: PANGAEA 2010
Subjects:
BIO
IPY
Online Access:https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230
id ftpangaea:oai:pangaea.de:doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.807230
record_format openpolar
spelling ftpangaea:oai:pangaea.de:doi:10.1594/PANGAEA.807230 2023-05-15T13:49:51+02:00 (Table 1) Comparison of dive duration and speed of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) equipped with internal and external devices Beaulieu, Michaël Ropert-Coudert, Yan Le Maho, Yvon Ancel, André LATITUDE: -66.666700 * LONGITUDE: 140.016700 2010-02-14 text/tab-separated-values, 40 data points https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230 https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230 en eng PANGAEA https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230 https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230 CC-BY-3.0: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported Access constraints: unrestricted info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess CC-BY Supplement to: Beaulieu, Michaël; Ropert-Coudert, Yan; Le Maho, Yvon; Ancel, André (2010): Is abdominal implantation of devices a good alternative to external attachment? A comparative study in Adélie penguins. Journal of Ornithology, 151(3), 579-586, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0491-2 Antarctica BIO Biology Device type Dive duration Dive/swim depth Dive depth standard deviation International Polar Year (2007-2008) IPY Number Petrel_Is Sample amount Speed velocity Time in seconds Dataset 2010 ftpangaea https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0491-2 2023-01-20T09:00:31Z Bio-logging studies suffer from the lack of real controls. However, it is still possible to compare indirect parameters between control and equipped animals to assess the level of global disturbance due to instrumentation. In addition, it is also possible to compare the behaviour of free-ranging animals between individuals equipped with different techniques or instruments to determine the less deleterious approach. We instrumented Adelie Penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) with internal or external time-depth recorders and monitored them in parallel with a control group during the first foraging trip following instrumentation. Foraging trip duration was significantly longer in the internally-equipped group. This difference was due to a larger number of dives, reflecting a lower foraging ability or a higher food demand, and longer periods of recovery at the surface. These longer recovery periods were likely to be due to a reduced efficiency to ventilate at the surface, probably because the implanted devices pressurised adjacent organs such as air sacs. Moreover, descent and ascent rates were slightly lower in externally-equipped penguins, presumably because external instrumentation increased the bird drag. Looking at our results, implantation appears more disadvantageous - at least for short-term deployment - than external equipment in Adelie Penguins, while this method has been described to induce no negative effects in long-term studies. This underlines the need to control for potential effects due to methodological aspects in any study using data loggers in free-ranging animals, to minimise disturbance and collect reliable data. Dataset Antarc* Antarctica International Polar Year IPY Pygoscelis adeliae PANGAEA - Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science ENVELOPE(140.016700,140.016700,-66.666700,-66.666700)
institution Open Polar
collection PANGAEA - Data Publisher for Earth & Environmental Science
op_collection_id ftpangaea
language English
topic Antarctica
BIO
Biology
Device type
Dive
duration
Dive/swim depth
Dive depth
standard deviation
International Polar Year (2007-2008)
IPY
Number
Petrel_Is
Sample amount
Speed
velocity
Time in seconds
spellingShingle Antarctica
BIO
Biology
Device type
Dive
duration
Dive/swim depth
Dive depth
standard deviation
International Polar Year (2007-2008)
IPY
Number
Petrel_Is
Sample amount
Speed
velocity
Time in seconds
Beaulieu, Michaël
Ropert-Coudert, Yan
Le Maho, Yvon
Ancel, André
(Table 1) Comparison of dive duration and speed of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) equipped with internal and external devices
topic_facet Antarctica
BIO
Biology
Device type
Dive
duration
Dive/swim depth
Dive depth
standard deviation
International Polar Year (2007-2008)
IPY
Number
Petrel_Is
Sample amount
Speed
velocity
Time in seconds
description Bio-logging studies suffer from the lack of real controls. However, it is still possible to compare indirect parameters between control and equipped animals to assess the level of global disturbance due to instrumentation. In addition, it is also possible to compare the behaviour of free-ranging animals between individuals equipped with different techniques or instruments to determine the less deleterious approach. We instrumented Adelie Penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) with internal or external time-depth recorders and monitored them in parallel with a control group during the first foraging trip following instrumentation. Foraging trip duration was significantly longer in the internally-equipped group. This difference was due to a larger number of dives, reflecting a lower foraging ability or a higher food demand, and longer periods of recovery at the surface. These longer recovery periods were likely to be due to a reduced efficiency to ventilate at the surface, probably because the implanted devices pressurised adjacent organs such as air sacs. Moreover, descent and ascent rates were slightly lower in externally-equipped penguins, presumably because external instrumentation increased the bird drag. Looking at our results, implantation appears more disadvantageous - at least for short-term deployment - than external equipment in Adelie Penguins, while this method has been described to induce no negative effects in long-term studies. This underlines the need to control for potential effects due to methodological aspects in any study using data loggers in free-ranging animals, to minimise disturbance and collect reliable data.
format Dataset
author Beaulieu, Michaël
Ropert-Coudert, Yan
Le Maho, Yvon
Ancel, André
author_facet Beaulieu, Michaël
Ropert-Coudert, Yan
Le Maho, Yvon
Ancel, André
author_sort Beaulieu, Michaël
title (Table 1) Comparison of dive duration and speed of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) equipped with internal and external devices
title_short (Table 1) Comparison of dive duration and speed of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) equipped with internal and external devices
title_full (Table 1) Comparison of dive duration and speed of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) equipped with internal and external devices
title_fullStr (Table 1) Comparison of dive duration and speed of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) equipped with internal and external devices
title_full_unstemmed (Table 1) Comparison of dive duration and speed of Adélie penguins (Pygoscelis adeliae) equipped with internal and external devices
title_sort (table 1) comparison of dive duration and speed of adélie penguins (pygoscelis adeliae) equipped with internal and external devices
publisher PANGAEA
publishDate 2010
url https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230
op_coverage LATITUDE: -66.666700 * LONGITUDE: 140.016700
long_lat ENVELOPE(140.016700,140.016700,-66.666700,-66.666700)
genre Antarc*
Antarctica
International Polar Year
IPY
Pygoscelis adeliae
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctica
International Polar Year
IPY
Pygoscelis adeliae
op_source Supplement to: Beaulieu, Michaël; Ropert-Coudert, Yan; Le Maho, Yvon; Ancel, André (2010): Is abdominal implantation of devices a good alternative to external attachment? A comparative study in Adélie penguins. Journal of Ornithology, 151(3), 579-586, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0491-2
op_relation https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230
https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230
op_rights CC-BY-3.0: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported
Access constraints: unrestricted
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.807230
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-009-0491-2
_version_ 1766252374887759872