Tab. 6+7: Altitudes and variations of altitudes in the area of the Filchner and Neumayer Stations

• Main Authors: Lindner, Klaus, Ritter, Bernhard
• Format: Dataset
• Language: English
• Published: PANGAEA 1985
• Subjects: AWI_stations; AWI Antarctic Land Expedition; DATE/TIME; Dronning Maud Land; Antarctica; Event label; Filchner Ronne Ice Shelf; Filchner-Schelfeis Expedition 1980/81; Filchner-Station; FSE81; Height; Neumayer; OBSE; Observation; Polarsirkel; Research station; RS; Sample code/label; WMO89002; Antarctic; Ronne Ice Shelf; Antarc*; Filchner-Ronne Ice Shelf; Ice Shelf; Ice Shelves; Polarforschung; Schelfeis*
• Online Access: https://doi.pangaea.de/10.1594/PANGAEA.761578; https://doi.org/10.1594/PANGAEA.761578

The determination of the strain and velocity behaviour of the ice surface near the two German Antarctic Stations on Filchner/Ronne and Ekström ice shelves was performed by the use of various geodetic measuring techniques. The relative positions and heights of control points valid for reference data were deduced from terrestrial observations (horizontal and vertical angle selectro optical distances). After a second sampling of data, these values served as the basis for the deformation analyses. Doppler-Satellite-observations (Navy Navigation Satellite System) made absolute positioning (latitude, longitude, height) of special points possible. These Doppler observations, supported by azimuth measurements (gyro-theodolite and sun observations) provided the datum of control networks (translations and orientation). After the repetition of these observations, the drift rates and azimuths of the control points as wenas the rotanon rates of the surface elements could be given. From vertical angles and horizontal distances differences in height end refraction coefficients were calculated. On days without clouds the refraction coefflcients increased by arnounts of up to 3.0 (in extreme cases up to 5.0). Distances over 1 km have to be subdivided to reach a standard deviation level of an heigh: difference better than 0.05 m. In order to determine the heterögeneity of refraction, some height differences should be measured with higher accuracy end-by subdivision of distances.