Comparison of kinetic and equilibrium reaction models insimulating gas hydrate behavior in porous media

In this study we compare the use of kinetic and equilibriumreaction models in the simulation of gas (methane) hydrate behavior inporous media. Our objective is to evaluate through numerical simulationthe importance of employing kinetic versus equilibrium reaction modelsfor predicting the response of...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kowalsky, Michael B., Moridis, George J.
Language:unknown
Published: 2009
Subjects:
58
Online Access:http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/923006
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/923006
id ftosti:oai:osti.gov:923006
record_format openpolar
spelling ftosti:oai:osti.gov:923006 2023-07-30T04:04:55+02:00 Comparison of kinetic and equilibrium reaction models insimulating gas hydrate behavior in porous media Kowalsky, Michael B. Moridis, George J. 2009-12-16 application/pdf http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/923006 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/923006 unknown http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/923006 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/923006 58 DEPRESSURIZATION GAS HYDRATES HYDRATES KINETICS METHANE NATURAL GAS PRODUCTION SATURATION SENSITIVITY SIMULATION STIMULATION STIMULI SURFACE AREA 2009 ftosti 2023-07-11T08:45:44Z In this study we compare the use of kinetic and equilibriumreaction models in the simulation of gas (methane) hydrate behavior inporous media. Our objective is to evaluate through numerical simulationthe importance of employing kinetic versus equilibrium reaction modelsfor predicting the response of hydrate-bearing systems to externalstimuli, such as changes in pressure and temperature. Specifically, we(1) analyze and compare the responses simulated using both reactionmodels for natural gas production from hydrates in various settings andfor the case of depressurization in a hydrate-bearing core duringextraction; and (2) examine the sensitivity to factors such as initialhydrate saturation, hydrate reaction surface area, and numericaldiscretization. We find that for large-scale systems undergoing thermalstimulation and depressurization, the calculated responses for bothreaction models are remarkably similar, though some differences areobserved at early times. However, for modeling short-term processes, suchas the rapid recovery of a hydrate-bearing core, kinetic limitations canbe important, and neglecting them may lead to significantunder-prediction of recoverable hydrate. The use of the equilibriumreaction model often appears to be justified and preferred for simulatingthe behavior of gas hydrates, given that the computational demands forthe kinetic reaction model far exceed those for the equilibrium reactionmodel. Other/Unknown Material Methane hydrate SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy)
institution Open Polar
collection SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy)
op_collection_id ftosti
language unknown
topic 58
DEPRESSURIZATION
GAS HYDRATES
HYDRATES
KINETICS
METHANE
NATURAL GAS
PRODUCTION
SATURATION
SENSITIVITY
SIMULATION
STIMULATION
STIMULI
SURFACE AREA
spellingShingle 58
DEPRESSURIZATION
GAS HYDRATES
HYDRATES
KINETICS
METHANE
NATURAL GAS
PRODUCTION
SATURATION
SENSITIVITY
SIMULATION
STIMULATION
STIMULI
SURFACE AREA
Kowalsky, Michael B.
Moridis, George J.
Comparison of kinetic and equilibrium reaction models insimulating gas hydrate behavior in porous media
topic_facet 58
DEPRESSURIZATION
GAS HYDRATES
HYDRATES
KINETICS
METHANE
NATURAL GAS
PRODUCTION
SATURATION
SENSITIVITY
SIMULATION
STIMULATION
STIMULI
SURFACE AREA
description In this study we compare the use of kinetic and equilibriumreaction models in the simulation of gas (methane) hydrate behavior inporous media. Our objective is to evaluate through numerical simulationthe importance of employing kinetic versus equilibrium reaction modelsfor predicting the response of hydrate-bearing systems to externalstimuli, such as changes in pressure and temperature. Specifically, we(1) analyze and compare the responses simulated using both reactionmodels for natural gas production from hydrates in various settings andfor the case of depressurization in a hydrate-bearing core duringextraction; and (2) examine the sensitivity to factors such as initialhydrate saturation, hydrate reaction surface area, and numericaldiscretization. We find that for large-scale systems undergoing thermalstimulation and depressurization, the calculated responses for bothreaction models are remarkably similar, though some differences areobserved at early times. However, for modeling short-term processes, suchas the rapid recovery of a hydrate-bearing core, kinetic limitations canbe important, and neglecting them may lead to significantunder-prediction of recoverable hydrate. The use of the equilibriumreaction model often appears to be justified and preferred for simulatingthe behavior of gas hydrates, given that the computational demands forthe kinetic reaction model far exceed those for the equilibrium reactionmodel.
author Kowalsky, Michael B.
Moridis, George J.
author_facet Kowalsky, Michael B.
Moridis, George J.
author_sort Kowalsky, Michael B.
title Comparison of kinetic and equilibrium reaction models insimulating gas hydrate behavior in porous media
title_short Comparison of kinetic and equilibrium reaction models insimulating gas hydrate behavior in porous media
title_full Comparison of kinetic and equilibrium reaction models insimulating gas hydrate behavior in porous media
title_fullStr Comparison of kinetic and equilibrium reaction models insimulating gas hydrate behavior in porous media
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of kinetic and equilibrium reaction models insimulating gas hydrate behavior in porous media
title_sort comparison of kinetic and equilibrium reaction models insimulating gas hydrate behavior in porous media
publishDate 2009
url http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/923006
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/923006
genre Methane hydrate
genre_facet Methane hydrate
op_relation http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/923006
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/923006
_version_ 1772816560380968960