LOW LEVEL LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE TREATMENT AT MURMANSK, RUSSIA: FACILITY UPGRADE AND EXPANSION

• Main Authors: BOWERMAN,B., CZAJKOWSKI,C., DYER,R.S., SORLIE,A.
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2008
• Subjects: 12 MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES; AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES; CAPACITY; CONSTRUCTION; DESIGN; LIQUID WASTES; RADIATION PROTECTION; LOW-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE WASTES; RUSSIAN FEDERATION; RADIOACTIVE WASTE PROCESSING; RADIOACTIVE WASTE FACILITIES; MODIFICATIONS; Arctic; Murmansk; Norway
• Online Access: http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/760998; https://www.osti.gov/biblio/760998

Today there exist many almost overfilled storage tanks with liquid radioactive waste in the Russian Federation. This waste was generated over several years by the civil and military utilization of nuclear power. The current waste treatment capacity is either not available or inadequate. Following the London Convention, dumping of the waste in the Arctic seas is no longer an alternative. Waste is being generated from today's operations, and large volumes are expected to be generated from the dismantling of decommissioned nuclear submarines. The US and Norway have an ongoing co-operation project with the Russian Federation to upgrade and expand the capacity of a treatment facility for low level liquid waste at the RTP Atomflot site in Murmansk. The capacity will be increased from 1,200 m{sup 3}/year to 5,000 m{sup 3} /year. The facility will also be able to treat high saline waste. The construction phase will be completed the first half of 1998. This will be followed by a start-up and a one year post-construction phase, with US and Norwegian involvement for the entire project. The new facility will consist of 9 units containing various electrochemical, filtration, and sorbent-based treatment systems. The units will be housed in two existing buildings, and must meet more stringent radiation protection requirements that were not enacted when the facility was originally designed. The US and Norwegian technical teams have evaluated the Russian design and associated documentation. The Russian partners send monthly progress reports to US and Norway. Not only technical issues must be overcome but also cultural differences resulting from different methods of management techniques. Six to eight hour time differentials between the partners make real time decisions difficult and relying on electronic age tools becomes extremely important. Language difficulties is another challenge that must be solved. Finding a common vocabulary, and working through interpreters make the process very vulnerable. Each of these obstacles can ...