Regional conversion to coal. Final report

This report describes an investigation of powerplant coal conversion, and the options and problems confronting a group of electric utility companies in an example region. The region selected for the study is New England, but the analysis format is valid for other regions having different specific co...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McKimmey, M.L.
Language:unknown
Published: 2020
Subjects:
USA
Online Access:http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/7044310
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7044310
https://doi.org/10.2172/7044310
id ftosti:oai:osti.gov:7044310
record_format openpolar
spelling ftosti:oai:osti.gov:7044310 2023-07-30T04:05:39+02:00 Regional conversion to coal. Final report McKimmey, M.L. 2020-08-28 application/pdf http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/7044310 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7044310 https://doi.org/10.2172/7044310 unknown http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/7044310 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7044310 https://doi.org/10.2172/7044310 doi:10.2172/7044310 20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS 01 COAL LIGNITE AND PEAT FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS FEASIBILITY STUDIES GAS BURNERS RETROFITTING OIL BURNERS STEAM GENERATORS BOILER FUEL COAL COAL LIQUIDS COMBUSTION COST COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS DIAGRAMS ELECTRIC UTILITIES FUEL SLURRIES MIXTURES NORTH ATLANTIC REGION PETROLEUM SYNTHETIC FUELS BOILERS BURNERS CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS CHEMICAL REACTIONS DISPERSIONS ENERGY SOURCES FLUIDS FOSSIL FUELS FUELS LIQUIDS MATERIALS NORTH AMERICA OXIDATION POWER PLANTS PUBLIC UTILITIES SLURRIES SUSPENSIONS THERMAL POWER PLANTS THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES USA VAPOR GENERATORS 2020 ftosti https://doi.org/10.2172/7044310 2023-07-11T10:53:41Z This report describes an investigation of powerplant coal conversion, and the options and problems confronting a group of electric utility companies in an example region. The region selected for the study is New England, but the analysis format is valid for other regions having different specific conditions but facing the same general conversion mandates. The report concludes that: (1) Because of its physical characteristics, simple conversion to coal of a utility steam boiler unit designed for oil or gas is not feasible. Boiler replacement of pre-boiler coal liquefaction or gasification would be required to make the conversion to coal. (2) Coal-oil mixture combustion is a promising concept for the partial displacement of oil that could have significant application in New England. (3) Coal-derived synthetic boiler fuels, primarily liquids, could play a significant role in the conversion of existing units, but their availability in sufficient quantities by 1990 is doubtful. (4) The region's indigenous coal and hydropower resources are not expected to impact the energy mix by 1990, if ever. (5) The mediation process conducted for the Brayton Point plant is exemplary and should be encouraged in other coal conversion efforts. Responsible environmental compromise, brought about by negotiations conducted in a spirit of cooperation, provided the catalyst for that conversion project and can do the same for others. (6) The coal conversion scenario outlined in this study describes one approach by which utility oil consumption could be reduced by about 35 million barrels per year by the year 1990. This scenario, one of many which could be theorized, could cost electric utility customers some 1 billion dollars (1980 dollars) and will have severe effects on the region's electric system reliability. Other/Unknown Material North Atlantic SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy)
institution Open Polar
collection SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy)
op_collection_id ftosti
language unknown
topic 20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS
01 COAL
LIGNITE
AND PEAT
FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS
FEASIBILITY STUDIES
GAS BURNERS
RETROFITTING
OIL BURNERS
STEAM GENERATORS
BOILER FUEL
COAL
COAL LIQUIDS
COMBUSTION
COST
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
DIAGRAMS
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
FUEL SLURRIES
MIXTURES
NORTH ATLANTIC REGION
PETROLEUM
SYNTHETIC FUELS
BOILERS
BURNERS
CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS
CHEMICAL REACTIONS
DISPERSIONS
ENERGY SOURCES
FLUIDS
FOSSIL FUELS
FUELS
LIQUIDS
MATERIALS
NORTH AMERICA
OXIDATION
POWER PLANTS
PUBLIC UTILITIES
SLURRIES
SUSPENSIONS
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES
USA
VAPOR GENERATORS
spellingShingle 20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS
01 COAL
LIGNITE
AND PEAT
FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS
FEASIBILITY STUDIES
GAS BURNERS
RETROFITTING
OIL BURNERS
STEAM GENERATORS
BOILER FUEL
COAL
COAL LIQUIDS
COMBUSTION
COST
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
DIAGRAMS
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
FUEL SLURRIES
MIXTURES
NORTH ATLANTIC REGION
PETROLEUM
SYNTHETIC FUELS
BOILERS
BURNERS
CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS
CHEMICAL REACTIONS
DISPERSIONS
ENERGY SOURCES
FLUIDS
FOSSIL FUELS
FUELS
LIQUIDS
MATERIALS
NORTH AMERICA
OXIDATION
POWER PLANTS
PUBLIC UTILITIES
SLURRIES
SUSPENSIONS
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES
USA
VAPOR GENERATORS
McKimmey, M.L.
Regional conversion to coal. Final report
topic_facet 20 FOSSIL-FUELED POWER PLANTS
01 COAL
LIGNITE
AND PEAT
FOSSIL-FUEL POWER PLANTS
FEASIBILITY STUDIES
GAS BURNERS
RETROFITTING
OIL BURNERS
STEAM GENERATORS
BOILER FUEL
COAL
COAL LIQUIDS
COMBUSTION
COST
COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS
DIAGRAMS
ELECTRIC UTILITIES
FUEL SLURRIES
MIXTURES
NORTH ATLANTIC REGION
PETROLEUM
SYNTHETIC FUELS
BOILERS
BURNERS
CARBONACEOUS MATERIALS
CHEMICAL REACTIONS
DISPERSIONS
ENERGY SOURCES
FLUIDS
FOSSIL FUELS
FUELS
LIQUIDS
MATERIALS
NORTH AMERICA
OXIDATION
POWER PLANTS
PUBLIC UTILITIES
SLURRIES
SUSPENSIONS
THERMAL POWER PLANTS
THERMOCHEMICAL PROCESSES
USA
VAPOR GENERATORS
description This report describes an investigation of powerplant coal conversion, and the options and problems confronting a group of electric utility companies in an example region. The region selected for the study is New England, but the analysis format is valid for other regions having different specific conditions but facing the same general conversion mandates. The report concludes that: (1) Because of its physical characteristics, simple conversion to coal of a utility steam boiler unit designed for oil or gas is not feasible. Boiler replacement of pre-boiler coal liquefaction or gasification would be required to make the conversion to coal. (2) Coal-oil mixture combustion is a promising concept for the partial displacement of oil that could have significant application in New England. (3) Coal-derived synthetic boiler fuels, primarily liquids, could play a significant role in the conversion of existing units, but their availability in sufficient quantities by 1990 is doubtful. (4) The region's indigenous coal and hydropower resources are not expected to impact the energy mix by 1990, if ever. (5) The mediation process conducted for the Brayton Point plant is exemplary and should be encouraged in other coal conversion efforts. Responsible environmental compromise, brought about by negotiations conducted in a spirit of cooperation, provided the catalyst for that conversion project and can do the same for others. (6) The coal conversion scenario outlined in this study describes one approach by which utility oil consumption could be reduced by about 35 million barrels per year by the year 1990. This scenario, one of many which could be theorized, could cost electric utility customers some 1 billion dollars (1980 dollars) and will have severe effects on the region's electric system reliability.
author McKimmey, M.L.
author_facet McKimmey, M.L.
author_sort McKimmey, M.L.
title Regional conversion to coal. Final report
title_short Regional conversion to coal. Final report
title_full Regional conversion to coal. Final report
title_fullStr Regional conversion to coal. Final report
title_full_unstemmed Regional conversion to coal. Final report
title_sort regional conversion to coal. final report
publishDate 2020
url http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/7044310
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7044310
https://doi.org/10.2172/7044310
genre North Atlantic
genre_facet North Atlantic
op_relation http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/7044310
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/7044310
https://doi.org/10.2172/7044310
doi:10.2172/7044310
op_doi https://doi.org/10.2172/7044310
_version_ 1772817704337539072