Occupancy-counter-based control system. Final report

• Main Authors: Schultz, G., Hoagland, L. C., Bowman, J. K.
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2015
• Subjects: 32 ENERGY CONSERVATION; CONSUMPTION; AND UTILIZATION; 29 ENERGY PLANNING; POLICY AND ECONOMY; COMMERCIAL BUILDINGS; VENTILATION SYSTEMS; COMPUTERIZED CONTROL SYSTEMS; PERFORMANCE TESTING; COOLING LOAD; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; FIELD TESTS; FUEL CONSUMPTION; HEATING LOAD; LIGHTING LOADS; MASSACHUSETTS; OCCUPANTS; PAYBACK PERIOD; POWER DEMAND; SPACE HVAC SYSTEMS; BUILDINGS; CONTROL SYSTEMS; DATA; ENERGY SYSTEMS; INFORMATION; NORTH AMERICA; NORTH ATLANTIC REGION; NUMERICAL DATA; TESTING; USA; North Atlantic
• Online Access: http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/6540547; https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6540547; https://doi.org/10.2172/6540547

Excessive mechanical ventilation of commercial and institutional buildings can result in significant waste of energy required for space heating and cooling. Ventilation rates are typically set to satisfy building design occupancy levels, in accordance with local codes, even though the building may seldom or never experience design occupancy. A method of eliminating this waste to utilize an occupancy-based ventilation control system wherein a counting device records people entering and leaving the building, to maintain a continuous record of people inventory, and to regulate mechanical ventilation control dampers to supply only that amount of ventilation air required for current occupancy levels is described. A device of this type was installed and tested in a department store in Framingham, Massachusetts and fully instrumented and operated over a 14 month period. Test results on energy usage were correlated with weather severity in order to determine the savings resulting from use of the control system. This system provided a savings of 33% in gas usage during the winter period and a savings of 23% in electricity usage during the summer period. These savings would return the installed cost of the control system in about 1 1/2 years. Projections of the performance of this system in other climatic regions (Chicago, Los Angeles, Kansas City, Miami, Minneapolis) are also presented illustrating payback periods ranging from 1/3 year in Miami to 2 2/3 years in Los Angeles. Complete details of the occupancy based ventilation control system, the test site instrumentation and data gathering procedure, the test results and their interpretation are given. (MCW)