STUDY OF REMOTE MILITARY POWER APPLICATIONS REPORT NO. 1. SUMMARY

An economic evaluation of the construction and operation of 5 to 46 Mw(e) nuclear power plants at several military installations throughout the world is presented. After an evaluation of economic factors involved, 10 sites were chosen for which the cost of nuclear power is most nearly economically c...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: None
Language:unknown
Published: 2016
Subjects:
REACTOR TECHNOLOGY
ECONOMICS
ENVIRONMENT
MAINTENANCE
MILITARY APPLICATIONS
OPERATION
PERSONNEL
PLANNING
POWER PLANTS
REACTORS
USES
McMurdo Sound
Zeus
Antarc*
Antarctica
Online Access:http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/4132375
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/4132375
https://doi.org/10.2172/4132375
Description
Summary:An economic evaluation of the construction and operation of 5 to 46 Mw(e) nuclear power plants at several military installations throughout the world is presented. After an evaluation of economic factors involved, 10 sites were chosen for which the cost of nuclear power is most nearly economically competitive with conventional power costs. The 10 sites include Okinawa, Guam, Thule, Asmara (Eritrea), Inchon, McMurdo Sound (Antarctica), a barge in the Atlantic Ocean, and three sites in the U. S. (NORAD, Super Sage, and Nike-Zeus). A comparison between the capital cost for the nuclear power plant and the conventional power plant is made for all sites. Operating, maintenance, labor, supply, and fuel-oil costs were calculated for an annual cost that could be applied over the assumed 20-year life of the plant. Descriptions and designs of each site are included. (C.J.G.)

Similar Items