The winter central Arctic surface energy budget: A model evaluation using observations from the MOSAiC campaign

This study evaluates the simulation of wintertime (15 October, 2019, to 15 March, 2020) statistics of the central Arctic near-surface atmosphere and surface energy budget observed during the MOSAiC campaign with short-term forecasts from 7 state-of-the-art operational and experimental forecast syste...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Elem Sci Anth
Main Authors: Solomon, Amy, Shupe, Matthew D., Svensson, Gunilla, Barton, Neil P., Batrak, Yurii, Bazile, Eric, Day, Jonathan J., Doyle, James D., Frank, Helmut P., Keeley, Sarah, Remes, Teresa, Tolstykh, Mikhail
Language:unknown
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1975723
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1975723
https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00104
id ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1975723
record_format openpolar
spelling ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1975723 2023-07-30T04:00:54+02:00 The winter central Arctic surface energy budget: A model evaluation using observations from the MOSAiC campaign Solomon, Amy Shupe, Matthew D. Svensson, Gunilla Barton, Neil P. Batrak, Yurii Bazile, Eric Day, Jonathan J. Doyle, James D. Frank, Helmut P. Keeley, Sarah Remes, Teresa Tolstykh, Mikhail 2023-06-06 application/pdf http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1975723 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1975723 https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00104 unknown http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1975723 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1975723 https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00104 doi:10.1525/elementa.2022.00104 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 2023 ftosti https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00104 2023-07-11T10:27:22Z This study evaluates the simulation of wintertime (15 October, 2019, to 15 March, 2020) statistics of the central Arctic near-surface atmosphere and surface energy budget observed during the MOSAiC campaign with short-term forecasts from 7 state-of-the-art operational and experimental forecast systems. Five of these systems are fully coupled ocean-sea ice-atmosphere models. Forecast systems need to simultaneously simulate the impact of radiative effects, turbulence, and precipitation processes on the surface energy budget and near-surface atmospheric conditions in order to produce useful forecasts of the Arctic system. This study focuses on processes unique to the Arctic, such as, the representation of liquid-bearing clouds at cold temperatures and the representation of a persistent stable boundary layer. It is found that contemporary models still struggle to maintain liquid water in clouds at cold temperatures. Given the simple balance between net longwave radiation, sensible heat flux, and conductive ground flux in the wintertime Arctic surface energy balance, a bias in one of these components manifests as a compensating bias in other terms. This study highlights the different manifestations of model bias and the potential implications on other terms. Three general types of challenges are found within the models evaluated: representing the radiative impact of clouds, representing the interaction of atmospheric heat fluxes with sub-surface fluxes (i.e., snow and ice properties), and representing the relationship between stability and turbulent heat fluxes. Other/Unknown Material Arctic Sea ice SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy) Arctic Elem Sci Anth 11 1
institution Open Polar
collection SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy)
op_collection_id ftosti
language unknown
topic 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
spellingShingle 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Solomon, Amy
Shupe, Matthew D.
Svensson, Gunilla
Barton, Neil P.
Batrak, Yurii
Bazile, Eric
Day, Jonathan J.
Doyle, James D.
Frank, Helmut P.
Keeley, Sarah
Remes, Teresa
Tolstykh, Mikhail
The winter central Arctic surface energy budget: A model evaluation using observations from the MOSAiC campaign
topic_facet 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
description This study evaluates the simulation of wintertime (15 October, 2019, to 15 March, 2020) statistics of the central Arctic near-surface atmosphere and surface energy budget observed during the MOSAiC campaign with short-term forecasts from 7 state-of-the-art operational and experimental forecast systems. Five of these systems are fully coupled ocean-sea ice-atmosphere models. Forecast systems need to simultaneously simulate the impact of radiative effects, turbulence, and precipitation processes on the surface energy budget and near-surface atmospheric conditions in order to produce useful forecasts of the Arctic system. This study focuses on processes unique to the Arctic, such as, the representation of liquid-bearing clouds at cold temperatures and the representation of a persistent stable boundary layer. It is found that contemporary models still struggle to maintain liquid water in clouds at cold temperatures. Given the simple balance between net longwave radiation, sensible heat flux, and conductive ground flux in the wintertime Arctic surface energy balance, a bias in one of these components manifests as a compensating bias in other terms. This study highlights the different manifestations of model bias and the potential implications on other terms. Three general types of challenges are found within the models evaluated: representing the radiative impact of clouds, representing the interaction of atmospheric heat fluxes with sub-surface fluxes (i.e., snow and ice properties), and representing the relationship between stability and turbulent heat fluxes.
author Solomon, Amy
Shupe, Matthew D.
Svensson, Gunilla
Barton, Neil P.
Batrak, Yurii
Bazile, Eric
Day, Jonathan J.
Doyle, James D.
Frank, Helmut P.
Keeley, Sarah
Remes, Teresa
Tolstykh, Mikhail
author_facet Solomon, Amy
Shupe, Matthew D.
Svensson, Gunilla
Barton, Neil P.
Batrak, Yurii
Bazile, Eric
Day, Jonathan J.
Doyle, James D.
Frank, Helmut P.
Keeley, Sarah
Remes, Teresa
Tolstykh, Mikhail
author_sort Solomon, Amy
title The winter central Arctic surface energy budget: A model evaluation using observations from the MOSAiC campaign
title_short The winter central Arctic surface energy budget: A model evaluation using observations from the MOSAiC campaign
title_full The winter central Arctic surface energy budget: A model evaluation using observations from the MOSAiC campaign
title_fullStr The winter central Arctic surface energy budget: A model evaluation using observations from the MOSAiC campaign
title_full_unstemmed The winter central Arctic surface energy budget: A model evaluation using observations from the MOSAiC campaign
title_sort winter central arctic surface energy budget: a model evaluation using observations from the mosaic campaign
publishDate 2023
url http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1975723
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1975723
https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00104
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Sea ice
op_relation http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1975723
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1975723
https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00104
doi:10.1525/elementa.2022.00104
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1525/elementa.2022.00104
container_title Elem Sci Anth
container_volume 11
container_issue 1
_version_ 1772811579590443008