Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)

We compare the Arctic amplification (AA) produced by the two Community Earth System Models CESM1 and CESM2, members of the CEMIP5 (Coupled Models Intercomparison Project phase 5) and CEMIP6 collections, respectively. We find that the CESM1 model reproduces the recent high values of the AA deduced fr...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Atmosphere
Main Authors: Chylek, Petr, Folland, Chris, Klett, James D., Lesins, Glen, Dubey, Manvendra Krishna
Language:unknown
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1975057
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1975057
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820
id ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1975057
record_format openpolar
spelling ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1975057 2023-07-30T04:01:23+02:00 Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2) Chylek, Petr Folland, Chris Klett, James D. Lesins, Glen Dubey, Manvendra Krishna 2023-06-07 application/pdf http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1975057 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1975057 https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820 unknown http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1975057 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1975057 https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820 doi:10.3390/atmos14050820 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 2023 ftosti https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820 2023-07-11T10:27:17Z We compare the Arctic amplification (AA) produced by the two Community Earth System Models CESM1 and CESM2, members of the CEMIP5 (Coupled Models Intercomparison Project phase 5) and CEMIP6 collections, respectively. We find that the CESM1 model reproduces the recent high values of the AA deduced from the observed temperature much better than the CESM2. The correlation coefficient within the 1970–2012 time period between CESM1-simulated AA and the observed one is 0.47, while the CESM2 simulation leads to an anticorrelation of r = –0.53. Even the more successful model (CESM1) is not able to reproduce recent high AA values of 4–5. The main cause of this failure is the model’s overestimate of the rate of increase in the mean global temperature in years post 1990. When the CESM1 model’s simulated trend of the mean global temperature is replaced in the expression for the AA by the observed temperature trend, the correlation coefficient increases from 0.47 to 0.75. The CESM1 model is among the best north American models in AA simulation while the CESM2 model is among the least successful. Other/Unknown Material Arctic SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy) Arctic Atmosphere 14 5 820
institution Open Polar
collection SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy)
op_collection_id ftosti
language unknown
topic 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
spellingShingle 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Chylek, Petr
Folland, Chris
Klett, James D.
Lesins, Glen
Dubey, Manvendra Krishna
Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
topic_facet 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
description We compare the Arctic amplification (AA) produced by the two Community Earth System Models CESM1 and CESM2, members of the CEMIP5 (Coupled Models Intercomparison Project phase 5) and CEMIP6 collections, respectively. We find that the CESM1 model reproduces the recent high values of the AA deduced from the observed temperature much better than the CESM2. The correlation coefficient within the 1970–2012 time period between CESM1-simulated AA and the observed one is 0.47, while the CESM2 simulation leads to an anticorrelation of r = –0.53. Even the more successful model (CESM1) is not able to reproduce recent high AA values of 4–5. The main cause of this failure is the model’s overestimate of the rate of increase in the mean global temperature in years post 1990. When the CESM1 model’s simulated trend of the mean global temperature is replaced in the expression for the AA by the observed temperature trend, the correlation coefficient increases from 0.47 to 0.75. The CESM1 model is among the best north American models in AA simulation while the CESM2 model is among the least successful.
author Chylek, Petr
Folland, Chris
Klett, James D.
Lesins, Glen
Dubey, Manvendra Krishna
author_facet Chylek, Petr
Folland, Chris
Klett, James D.
Lesins, Glen
Dubey, Manvendra Krishna
author_sort Chylek, Petr
title Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
title_short Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
title_full Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
title_fullStr Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
title_full_unstemmed Arctic Amplification in the Community Earth System Models (CESM1 and CESM2)
title_sort arctic amplification in the community earth system models (cesm1 and cesm2)
publishDate 2023
url http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1975057
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1975057
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1975057
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1975057
https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820
doi:10.3390/atmos14050820
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos14050820
container_title Atmosphere
container_volume 14
container_issue 5
container_start_page 820
_version_ 1772812123684995072