Machine learning feature analysis illuminates disparity between E3SM climate models and observed climate change

In September of 2020, Arctic sea ice extent was the second-lowest on record. State of the art climate prediction uses Earth system models (ESMs), driven by systems of differential equations representing the laws of physics. Previously, these models have tended to underestimate Arctic sea ice loss. T...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
Main Authors: Nichol, J. Jake, Peterson, Matthew G., Peterson, Kara J., Fricke, G. Matthew, Moses, Melanie E.
Language:unknown
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1782577
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1782577
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113451
id ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1782577
record_format openpolar
spelling ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1782577 2023-07-30T04:01:15+02:00 Machine learning feature analysis illuminates disparity between E3SM climate models and observed climate change Nichol, J. Jake Peterson, Matthew G. Peterson, Kara J. Fricke, G. Matthew Moses, Melanie E. 2022-03-29 application/pdf http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1782577 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1782577 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113451 unknown http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1782577 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1782577 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113451 doi:10.1016/j.cam.2021.113451 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 2022 ftosti https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113451 2023-07-11T10:03:32Z In September of 2020, Arctic sea ice extent was the second-lowest on record. State of the art climate prediction uses Earth system models (ESMs), driven by systems of differential equations representing the laws of physics. Previously, these models have tended to underestimate Arctic sea ice loss. The issue is grave because accurate modeling is critical for economic, ecological, and geopolitical planning. We use machine learning techniques, including random forest regression and Gini importance, to show that the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) relies too heavily on just one of the ten chosen climatological quantities to predict September sea ice averages. Furthermore, E3SM gives too much importance to six of those quantities when compared to observed data. Finally, identifying the features that climate models incorrectly rely on should allow climatologists to improve prediction accuracy. Other/Unknown Material Arctic Climate change Sea ice SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy) Arctic Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 395 113451
institution Open Polar
collection SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy)
op_collection_id ftosti
language unknown
topic 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
spellingShingle 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Nichol, J. Jake
Peterson, Matthew G.
Peterson, Kara J.
Fricke, G. Matthew
Moses, Melanie E.
Machine learning feature analysis illuminates disparity between E3SM climate models and observed climate change
topic_facet 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
description In September of 2020, Arctic sea ice extent was the second-lowest on record. State of the art climate prediction uses Earth system models (ESMs), driven by systems of differential equations representing the laws of physics. Previously, these models have tended to underestimate Arctic sea ice loss. The issue is grave because accurate modeling is critical for economic, ecological, and geopolitical planning. We use machine learning techniques, including random forest regression and Gini importance, to show that the Energy Exascale Earth System Model (E3SM) relies too heavily on just one of the ten chosen climatological quantities to predict September sea ice averages. Furthermore, E3SM gives too much importance to six of those quantities when compared to observed data. Finally, identifying the features that climate models incorrectly rely on should allow climatologists to improve prediction accuracy.
author Nichol, J. Jake
Peterson, Matthew G.
Peterson, Kara J.
Fricke, G. Matthew
Moses, Melanie E.
author_facet Nichol, J. Jake
Peterson, Matthew G.
Peterson, Kara J.
Fricke, G. Matthew
Moses, Melanie E.
author_sort Nichol, J. Jake
title Machine learning feature analysis illuminates disparity between E3SM climate models and observed climate change
title_short Machine learning feature analysis illuminates disparity between E3SM climate models and observed climate change
title_full Machine learning feature analysis illuminates disparity between E3SM climate models and observed climate change
title_fullStr Machine learning feature analysis illuminates disparity between E3SM climate models and observed climate change
title_full_unstemmed Machine learning feature analysis illuminates disparity between E3SM climate models and observed climate change
title_sort machine learning feature analysis illuminates disparity between e3sm climate models and observed climate change
publishDate 2022
url http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1782577
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1782577
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113451
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
Climate change
Sea ice
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
Sea ice
op_relation http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1782577
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1782577
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113451
doi:10.1016/j.cam.2021.113451
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113451
container_title Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics
container_volume 395
container_start_page 113451
_version_ 1772812003677569024