Hubble constant difference between CMB lensing and BAO measurements

We apply a tension metric QUDM, the update difference in mean parameters, to understand the source of the difference in the measured Hubble constant H0 inferred with cosmic microwave background lensing measurements from the Planck satellite (H 0 = $67.9$ $^{+1.1}_{–1.3}$ km/s/Mpc) and from the South...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Physical Review D
Main Authors: Wu, W. L. Kimmy, Motloch, Pavel, Hu, Wayne, Raveri, Marco
Language:unknown
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1734898
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1734898
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.102.023510
id ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1734898
record_format openpolar
spelling ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1734898 2023-07-30T04:06:54+02:00 Hubble constant difference between CMB lensing and BAO measurements Wu, W. L. Kimmy Motloch, Pavel Hu, Wayne Raveri, Marco 2022-08-23 application/pdf http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1734898 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1734898 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.102.023510 unknown http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1734898 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1734898 https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.102.023510 doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.023510 79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS 2022 ftosti https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.102.023510 2023-07-11T09:57:03Z We apply a tension metric QUDM, the update difference in mean parameters, to understand the source of the difference in the measured Hubble constant H0 inferred with cosmic microwave background lensing measurements from the Planck satellite (H 0 = $67.9$ $^{+1.1}_{–1.3}$ km/s/Mpc) and from the South Pole Telescope (H 0 = $72.0$ $^{+2.1}_{–2.5}$ km/s/Mpc) when both are combined with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements with priors on the baryon density (BBN). Q UDM isolates the relevant parameter directions for tension or concordance where the two data sets are both informative, and aids in the identification of subsets of data that source the observed tension. With Q UDM , we uncover that the difference in H 0 is driven by the tension between Planck lensing and BAO+BBN, at probability-to-exceed of 6.6%. Most of this mild tension comes from the galaxy BAO measurements parallel to the line of sight in the redshift range 0.2 < z < 0.75. Here, the redshift dependence of the parallel BAOs pulls both the matter density Ω m and H 0 high in Λ CDM, but these parameter anomalies are usually hidden when the BAO measurements are combined with other cosmological data sets with much stronger Ω m constraints. Other/Unknown Material South pole SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy) South Pole Hubble ENVELOPE(158.317,158.317,-80.867,-80.867) Physical Review D 102 2
institution Open Polar
collection SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy)
op_collection_id ftosti
language unknown
topic 79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS
spellingShingle 79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS
Wu, W. L. Kimmy
Motloch, Pavel
Hu, Wayne
Raveri, Marco
Hubble constant difference between CMB lensing and BAO measurements
topic_facet 79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS
description We apply a tension metric QUDM, the update difference in mean parameters, to understand the source of the difference in the measured Hubble constant H0 inferred with cosmic microwave background lensing measurements from the Planck satellite (H 0 = $67.9$ $^{+1.1}_{–1.3}$ km/s/Mpc) and from the South Pole Telescope (H 0 = $72.0$ $^{+2.1}_{–2.5}$ km/s/Mpc) when both are combined with baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) measurements with priors on the baryon density (BBN). Q UDM isolates the relevant parameter directions for tension or concordance where the two data sets are both informative, and aids in the identification of subsets of data that source the observed tension. With Q UDM , we uncover that the difference in H 0 is driven by the tension between Planck lensing and BAO+BBN, at probability-to-exceed of 6.6%. Most of this mild tension comes from the galaxy BAO measurements parallel to the line of sight in the redshift range 0.2 < z < 0.75. Here, the redshift dependence of the parallel BAOs pulls both the matter density Ω m and H 0 high in Λ CDM, but these parameter anomalies are usually hidden when the BAO measurements are combined with other cosmological data sets with much stronger Ω m constraints.
author Wu, W. L. Kimmy
Motloch, Pavel
Hu, Wayne
Raveri, Marco
author_facet Wu, W. L. Kimmy
Motloch, Pavel
Hu, Wayne
Raveri, Marco
author_sort Wu, W. L. Kimmy
title Hubble constant difference between CMB lensing and BAO measurements
title_short Hubble constant difference between CMB lensing and BAO measurements
title_full Hubble constant difference between CMB lensing and BAO measurements
title_fullStr Hubble constant difference between CMB lensing and BAO measurements
title_full_unstemmed Hubble constant difference between CMB lensing and BAO measurements
title_sort hubble constant difference between cmb lensing and bao measurements
publishDate 2022
url http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1734898
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1734898
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.102.023510
long_lat ENVELOPE(158.317,158.317,-80.867,-80.867)
geographic South Pole
Hubble
geographic_facet South Pole
Hubble
genre South pole
genre_facet South pole
op_relation http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1734898
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1734898
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.102.023510
doi:10.1103/physrevd.102.023510
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.102.023510
container_title Physical Review D
container_volume 102
container_issue 2
_version_ 1772819850400366592