Soil incubations reproduce field methane dynamics in a subarctic wetland

A major challenge in peatland carbon cycle modeling is the estimation of subsurface methane (CH 4 ) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) production and consumption rates and pathways. The most common methods for modeling these processes are soil incubations and stable isotope modeling, both of which may invol...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Biogeochemistry
Main Authors: Hodgkins, Suzanne B., Chanton, Jeffrey P., Langford, Lauren C., McCalley, Carmody K., Saleska, Scott R., Rich, Virginia I., Crill, Patrick M., Cooper, William T.
Language:unknown
Published: 2023
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1602283
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1602283
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0142-z
id ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1602283
record_format openpolar
spelling ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1602283 2023-07-30T04:07:09+02:00 Soil incubations reproduce field methane dynamics in a subarctic wetland Hodgkins, Suzanne B. Chanton, Jeffrey P. Langford, Lauren C. McCalley, Carmody K. Saleska, Scott R. Rich, Virginia I. Crill, Patrick M. Cooper, William T. 2023-06-30 application/pdf http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1602283 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1602283 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0142-z unknown http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1602283 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1602283 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0142-z doi:10.1007/s10533-015-0142-z 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 2023 ftosti https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0142-z 2023-07-11T09:40:15Z A major challenge in peatland carbon cycle modeling is the estimation of subsurface methane (CH 4 ) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) production and consumption rates and pathways. The most common methods for modeling these processes are soil incubations and stable isotope modeling, both of which may involve departures from field conditions. To explore the impacts of these departures, we measured CH 4 /CO 2 concentration ratios and 13 C fractionation factors (α C , indicating CH 4 production pathways) in field pore water from a thawing subarctic peatland, and compared these values to those observed in incubations of corresponding peat samples. Incubation CH 4 /CO 2 production ratios were significantly and positively correlated with observed field CH 4 /CO 2 concentration ratios, though observed field ratios were ~20 % of those in incubations due to CH 4 ’s lower solubility in pore water. After correcting the field ratios for CH 4 loss with an isotope mass balance model, the incubation CH 4 /CO 2 ratios and α C were both significantly positively correlated with field ratios and α C (respectively), both with slopes indistinguishable from 1. Finally, although CH 4 /CO 2 ratios and α C were slightly higher in the incubations, these shifts were consistent along the thaw progression, indicating that ex situ incubations can replicate trends in in situ CH 4 production. Other/Unknown Material Subarctic SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy) Biogeochemistry 126 1-2 241 249
institution Open Polar
collection SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy)
op_collection_id ftosti
language unknown
topic 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
spellingShingle 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Hodgkins, Suzanne B.
Chanton, Jeffrey P.
Langford, Lauren C.
McCalley, Carmody K.
Saleska, Scott R.
Rich, Virginia I.
Crill, Patrick M.
Cooper, William T.
Soil incubations reproduce field methane dynamics in a subarctic wetland
topic_facet 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
description A major challenge in peatland carbon cycle modeling is the estimation of subsurface methane (CH 4 ) and carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) production and consumption rates and pathways. The most common methods for modeling these processes are soil incubations and stable isotope modeling, both of which may involve departures from field conditions. To explore the impacts of these departures, we measured CH 4 /CO 2 concentration ratios and 13 C fractionation factors (α C , indicating CH 4 production pathways) in field pore water from a thawing subarctic peatland, and compared these values to those observed in incubations of corresponding peat samples. Incubation CH 4 /CO 2 production ratios were significantly and positively correlated with observed field CH 4 /CO 2 concentration ratios, though observed field ratios were ~20 % of those in incubations due to CH 4 ’s lower solubility in pore water. After correcting the field ratios for CH 4 loss with an isotope mass balance model, the incubation CH 4 /CO 2 ratios and α C were both significantly positively correlated with field ratios and α C (respectively), both with slopes indistinguishable from 1. Finally, although CH 4 /CO 2 ratios and α C were slightly higher in the incubations, these shifts were consistent along the thaw progression, indicating that ex situ incubations can replicate trends in in situ CH 4 production.
author Hodgkins, Suzanne B.
Chanton, Jeffrey P.
Langford, Lauren C.
McCalley, Carmody K.
Saleska, Scott R.
Rich, Virginia I.
Crill, Patrick M.
Cooper, William T.
author_facet Hodgkins, Suzanne B.
Chanton, Jeffrey P.
Langford, Lauren C.
McCalley, Carmody K.
Saleska, Scott R.
Rich, Virginia I.
Crill, Patrick M.
Cooper, William T.
author_sort Hodgkins, Suzanne B.
title Soil incubations reproduce field methane dynamics in a subarctic wetland
title_short Soil incubations reproduce field methane dynamics in a subarctic wetland
title_full Soil incubations reproduce field methane dynamics in a subarctic wetland
title_fullStr Soil incubations reproduce field methane dynamics in a subarctic wetland
title_full_unstemmed Soil incubations reproduce field methane dynamics in a subarctic wetland
title_sort soil incubations reproduce field methane dynamics in a subarctic wetland
publishDate 2023
url http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1602283
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1602283
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0142-z
genre Subarctic
genre_facet Subarctic
op_relation http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1602283
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1602283
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0142-z
doi:10.1007/s10533-015-0142-z
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1007/s10533-015-0142-z
container_title Biogeochemistry
container_volume 126
container_issue 1-2
container_start_page 241
op_container_end_page 249
_version_ 1772820284884123648