Proportion of fine roots, but not plant biomass allocation below ground, increases with elevation in arctic tundra

Questions: Roots represent a considerable proportion of biomass, primary production and litter input in arctic tundra, and plant allocation of biomass to above- or below- ground tissue in response to climate change is a key factor in the future C balance of these ecosystems. According to optimality...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Vegetation Science
Main Authors: Blume-Werry, Gesche, Lindén, Elin, Andresen, Lisa, Classen, Aimée T., Sanders, Nathan J., von Oppen, Jonathan, Sundqvist, Maja K., Collins, Beverly Shawna
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1501424
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1501424
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12605
id ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1501424
record_format openpolar
spelling ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1501424 2023-07-30T03:55:22+02:00 Proportion of fine roots, but not plant biomass allocation below ground, increases with elevation in arctic tundra Blume-Werry, Gesche Lindén, Elin Andresen, Lisa Classen, Aimée T. Sanders, Nathan J. von Oppen, Jonathan Sundqvist, Maja K. Collins, Beverly Shawna 2021-08-31 application/pdf http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1501424 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1501424 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12605 unknown http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1501424 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1501424 https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12605 doi:10.1111/jvs.12605 59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES 2021 ftosti https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12605 2023-07-11T09:31:59Z Questions: Roots represent a considerable proportion of biomass, primary production and litter input in arctic tundra, and plant allocation of biomass to above- or below- ground tissue in response to climate change is a key factor in the future C balance of these ecosystems. According to optimality theory plants allocate C to the above- or below-ground structure that captures the most limiting resource. We used an elevational gradient to test this theory and as a space-for-time substitution to inform on tundra carbon allocation patterns under a shifting climate, by exploring if increasing elevation was positively related to the root:shoot ratio, as well as a larger plant allocation to adsorptive over storage roots. Location: Arctic tundra heath dominated by Empetrum hermaphroditum close to Abisko, Sweden. Methods: We measured root:shoot and fine:coarse root ratios of the plant communities along an elevational gradient by sampling above- and below-ground biomass, further separating root biomass into fine (<1 mm) and coarse roots. Results: Plant biomass was higher at the lower elevations, but the root:shoot ratio did not vary with elevation. Resource allocation to fine relative to coarse roots increased with elevation, resulting in a fine:coarse root ratio that more than doubled with in- creasing elevation. Conclusions: Contrary to previous works, the root:shoot ratio along this elevational gradient remained stable. However, communities along our study system were dominated by the same species at each elevation, which suggests that when changes in the root:shoot ratio occur with elevation these changes may be driven by differences in allocation patterns among species and thus turnover in plant community structure. Our results further reveal that the allocation of biomass to fine relative to coarse roots can differ between locations along an elevational gradient, even when overall above- vs below-ground biomass allocation does not. Given the functionally different roles of fine vs coarse roots this could have ... Other/Unknown Material Abisko Arctic Climate change Tundra SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy) Arctic Abisko ENVELOPE(18.829,18.829,68.349,68.349) Journal of Vegetation Science 29 2 226 235
institution Open Polar
collection SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy)
op_collection_id ftosti
language unknown
topic 59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
spellingShingle 59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
Blume-Werry, Gesche
Lindén, Elin
Andresen, Lisa
Classen, Aimée T.
Sanders, Nathan J.
von Oppen, Jonathan
Sundqvist, Maja K.
Collins, Beverly Shawna
Proportion of fine roots, but not plant biomass allocation below ground, increases with elevation in arctic tundra
topic_facet 59 BASIC BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES
description Questions: Roots represent a considerable proportion of biomass, primary production and litter input in arctic tundra, and plant allocation of biomass to above- or below- ground tissue in response to climate change is a key factor in the future C balance of these ecosystems. According to optimality theory plants allocate C to the above- or below-ground structure that captures the most limiting resource. We used an elevational gradient to test this theory and as a space-for-time substitution to inform on tundra carbon allocation patterns under a shifting climate, by exploring if increasing elevation was positively related to the root:shoot ratio, as well as a larger plant allocation to adsorptive over storage roots. Location: Arctic tundra heath dominated by Empetrum hermaphroditum close to Abisko, Sweden. Methods: We measured root:shoot and fine:coarse root ratios of the plant communities along an elevational gradient by sampling above- and below-ground biomass, further separating root biomass into fine (<1 mm) and coarse roots. Results: Plant biomass was higher at the lower elevations, but the root:shoot ratio did not vary with elevation. Resource allocation to fine relative to coarse roots increased with elevation, resulting in a fine:coarse root ratio that more than doubled with in- creasing elevation. Conclusions: Contrary to previous works, the root:shoot ratio along this elevational gradient remained stable. However, communities along our study system were dominated by the same species at each elevation, which suggests that when changes in the root:shoot ratio occur with elevation these changes may be driven by differences in allocation patterns among species and thus turnover in plant community structure. Our results further reveal that the allocation of biomass to fine relative to coarse roots can differ between locations along an elevational gradient, even when overall above- vs below-ground biomass allocation does not. Given the functionally different roles of fine vs coarse roots this could have ...
author Blume-Werry, Gesche
Lindén, Elin
Andresen, Lisa
Classen, Aimée T.
Sanders, Nathan J.
von Oppen, Jonathan
Sundqvist, Maja K.
Collins, Beverly Shawna
author_facet Blume-Werry, Gesche
Lindén, Elin
Andresen, Lisa
Classen, Aimée T.
Sanders, Nathan J.
von Oppen, Jonathan
Sundqvist, Maja K.
Collins, Beverly Shawna
author_sort Blume-Werry, Gesche
title Proportion of fine roots, but not plant biomass allocation below ground, increases with elevation in arctic tundra
title_short Proportion of fine roots, but not plant biomass allocation below ground, increases with elevation in arctic tundra
title_full Proportion of fine roots, but not plant biomass allocation below ground, increases with elevation in arctic tundra
title_fullStr Proportion of fine roots, but not plant biomass allocation below ground, increases with elevation in arctic tundra
title_full_unstemmed Proportion of fine roots, but not plant biomass allocation below ground, increases with elevation in arctic tundra
title_sort proportion of fine roots, but not plant biomass allocation below ground, increases with elevation in arctic tundra
publishDate 2021
url http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1501424
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1501424
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12605
long_lat ENVELOPE(18.829,18.829,68.349,68.349)
geographic Arctic
Abisko
geographic_facet Arctic
Abisko
genre Abisko
Arctic
Climate change
Tundra
genre_facet Abisko
Arctic
Climate change
Tundra
op_relation http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1501424
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1501424
https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12605
doi:10.1111/jvs.12605
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/jvs.12605
container_title Journal of Vegetation Science
container_volume 29
container_issue 2
container_start_page 226
op_container_end_page 235
_version_ 1772817776623222784