Testing for X-Ray–SZ Differences and Redshift Evolution in the X-Ray Morphology of Galaxy Clusters

• Published in: The Astrophysical Journal
• Main Authors: Nurgaliev, D., McDonald, M., Benson, B. A., Bleem, L., Bocquet, S., Forman, W. R., Garmire, G. P., Gupta, N., Hlavacek-Larrondo, J., Mohr, J. J., Nagai, D., Rapetti, D., Stark, A. A., Stubbs, C. W., Vikhlinin, A.
• Language: unknown
• Published: 2022
• Subjects: 79 ASTRONOMY AND ASTROPHYSICS; South Pole; South pole
• Online Access: http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1373304; https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1373304; https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa6db4

We present a quantitative study of the X-ray morphology of galaxy clusters, as a function of their detection method and redshift. We analyze two separate samples of galaxy clusters: a sample of 36 clusters at $0.35\lt z\lt 0.9$ selected in the X-ray with the ROSAT PSPC 400 deg(2) survey, and a sample of 90 clusters at $0.25\lt z\lt 1.2$ selected via the Sunyaev–Zel’dovich (SZ) effect with the South Pole Telescope. Clusters from both samples have similar-quality Chandra observations, which allow us to quantify their X-ray morphologies via two distinct methods: centroid shifts (w) and photon asymmetry (${A}_{\mathrm{phot}}$). The latter technique provides nearly unbiased morphology estimates for clusters spanning a broad range of redshift and data quality. We further compare the X-ray morphologies of X-ray- and SZ-selected clusters with those of simulated clusters. We do not find a statistically significant difference in the measured X-ray morphology of X-ray and SZ-selected clusters over the redshift range probed by these samples, suggesting that the two are probing similar populations of clusters. We find that the X-ray morphologies of simulated clusters are statistically indistinguishable from those of X-ray- or SZ-selected clusters, implying that the most important physics for dictating the large-scale gas morphology (outside of the core) is well-approximated in these simulations. Finally, we find no statistically significant redshift evolution in the X-ray morphology (both for observed and simulated clusters), over the range of $z\sim 0.3$ to $z\sim 1$, seemingly in contradiction with the redshift-dependent halo merger rate predicted by simulations.