Simulations of arctic mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with CAM3 and AM2 for M-PACE

[1] Simulations of mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with the NCAR Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3) and the GFDL Atmospheric Model version 2 (AM2) for the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) are performed using analysis data from numerical weather prediction centers. CAM3 significantly under...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of Geophysical Research
Main Authors: Xie, Shaocheng, Boyle, James, Klein, Stephen A., Liu, Xiaohong, Ghan, Steven
Language:unknown
Published: 2021
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1281698
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1281698
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009225
id ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1281698
record_format openpolar
spelling ftosti:oai:osti.gov:1281698 2023-07-30T04:01:18+02:00 Simulations of arctic mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with CAM3 and AM2 for M-PACE Xie, Shaocheng Boyle, James Klein, Stephen A. Liu, Xiaohong Ghan, Steven 2021-10-25 application/pdf http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1281698 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1281698 https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009225 unknown http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1281698 https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1281698 https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009225 doi:10.1029/2007JD009225 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES 2021 ftosti https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009225 2023-07-11T09:09:41Z [1] Simulations of mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with the NCAR Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3) and the GFDL Atmospheric Model version 2 (AM2) for the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) are performed using analysis data from numerical weather prediction centers. CAM3 significantly underestimates the observed boundary layer mixed-phase cloud fraction and cannot realistically simulate the variations of liquid water fraction with temperature and cloud height due to its oversimplified cloud microphysical scheme. In contrast, AM2 reasonably reproduces the observed boundary layer cloud fraction while its clouds contain much less cloud condensate than CAM3 and the observations. The simulation of the boundary layer mixed-phase clouds and their microphysical properties is considerably improved in CAM3 when a new physically based cloud microphysical scheme is used (CAM3LIU). The new scheme also leads to an improved simulation of the surface and top of the atmosphere longwave radiative fluxes. Sensitivity tests show that these results are not sensitive to the analysis data used for model initialization. Increasing model horizontal resolution helps capture the subgrid-scale features in Arctic frontal clouds but does not help improve the simulation of the single-layer boundary layer clouds. AM2 simulated cloud fraction and LWP are sensitive to the change in cloud ice number concentrations used in the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process while CAM3LIU only shows moderate sensitivity in its cloud fields to this change. Furthermore, this paper shows that the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process is important for these models to correctly simulate the observed features of mixed-phase clouds. Other/Unknown Material Arctic SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy) Arctic Journal of Geophysical Research 113 D4
institution Open Polar
collection SciTec Connect (Office of Scientific and Technical Information - OSTI, U.S. Department of Energy)
op_collection_id ftosti
language unknown
topic 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
spellingShingle 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Xie, Shaocheng
Boyle, James
Klein, Stephen A.
Liu, Xiaohong
Ghan, Steven
Simulations of arctic mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with CAM3 and AM2 for M-PACE
topic_facet 54 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
description [1] Simulations of mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with the NCAR Atmosphere Model version 3 (CAM3) and the GFDL Atmospheric Model version 2 (AM2) for the Mixed-Phase Arctic Cloud Experiment (M-PACE) are performed using analysis data from numerical weather prediction centers. CAM3 significantly underestimates the observed boundary layer mixed-phase cloud fraction and cannot realistically simulate the variations of liquid water fraction with temperature and cloud height due to its oversimplified cloud microphysical scheme. In contrast, AM2 reasonably reproduces the observed boundary layer cloud fraction while its clouds contain much less cloud condensate than CAM3 and the observations. The simulation of the boundary layer mixed-phase clouds and their microphysical properties is considerably improved in CAM3 when a new physically based cloud microphysical scheme is used (CAM3LIU). The new scheme also leads to an improved simulation of the surface and top of the atmosphere longwave radiative fluxes. Sensitivity tests show that these results are not sensitive to the analysis data used for model initialization. Increasing model horizontal resolution helps capture the subgrid-scale features in Arctic frontal clouds but does not help improve the simulation of the single-layer boundary layer clouds. AM2 simulated cloud fraction and LWP are sensitive to the change in cloud ice number concentrations used in the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process while CAM3LIU only shows moderate sensitivity in its cloud fields to this change. Furthermore, this paper shows that the Wegener-Bergeron-Findeisen process is important for these models to correctly simulate the observed features of mixed-phase clouds.
author Xie, Shaocheng
Boyle, James
Klein, Stephen A.
Liu, Xiaohong
Ghan, Steven
author_facet Xie, Shaocheng
Boyle, James
Klein, Stephen A.
Liu, Xiaohong
Ghan, Steven
author_sort Xie, Shaocheng
title Simulations of arctic mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with CAM3 and AM2 for M-PACE
title_short Simulations of arctic mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with CAM3 and AM2 for M-PACE
title_full Simulations of arctic mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with CAM3 and AM2 for M-PACE
title_fullStr Simulations of arctic mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with CAM3 and AM2 for M-PACE
title_full_unstemmed Simulations of arctic mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with CAM3 and AM2 for M-PACE
title_sort simulations of arctic mixed-phase clouds in forecasts with cam3 and am2 for m-pace
publishDate 2021
url http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1281698
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1281698
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009225
geographic Arctic
geographic_facet Arctic
genre Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
op_relation http://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/1281698
https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1281698
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009225
doi:10.1029/2007JD009225
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1029/2007JD009225
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research
container_volume 113
container_issue D4
_version_ 1772812038770262016