The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments

Government responses to the Covid-19 pandemic in the Nordic states—Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden—exhibit similarities and differences. This article investigates the extent to which crisis policymaking diverges from normal policymaking within the Nordic countries and whether variation...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Regulation & Governance
Main Authors: Christensen, Tom, Jensen, Mads Dagnis, Kluth, Michael, Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi, Lynggaard, Kennet, Lægreid, Per, Niemikari, Risto, Pierre, Jon, Raunio, Tapio, Adolf Skúlason, Gústaf
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10852/99330
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12497
id ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/99330
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/99330 2023-05-15T16:47:22+02:00 The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments ENEngelskEnglishThe Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments Christensen, Tom Jensen, Mads Dagnis Kluth, Michael Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi Lynggaard, Kennet Lægreid, Per Niemikari, Risto Pierre, Jon Raunio, Tapio Adolf Skúlason, Gústaf 2022-10-19T12:27:29Z http://hdl.handle.net/10852/99330 https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12497 EN eng Christensen, Tom Jensen, Mads Dagnis Kluth, Michael Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi Lynggaard, Kennet Lægreid, Per Niemikari, Risto Pierre, Jon Raunio, Tapio Adolf Skúlason, Gústaf . The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments. Regulation & Governance. 2022, 1-19 http://hdl.handle.net/10852/99330 2062755 info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Regulation & Governance&rft.volume=&rft.spage=1&rft.date=2022 Regulation & Governance 1 19 https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12497 Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ CC-BY-NC-ND 1748-5983 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed PublishedVersion 2022 ftoslouniv https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12497 2023-02-08T23:36:24Z Government responses to the Covid-19 pandemic in the Nordic states—Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden—exhibit similarities and differences. This article investigates the extent to which crisis policymaking diverges from normal policymaking within the Nordic countries and whether variations between the countries are associated with the role of expertise and the level of politicization. Government responses are analyzed in terms of governance arrangements and regulatory instruments. Findings demonstrate some deviation from normal policymaking within and considerable variation between the Nordic countries, as Denmark, Finland, and to some extent Norway exhibit similar patterns with hierarchical command and control governance arrangements, while Iceland, in some instances, resembles the case of Sweden, which has made use of network-based governance. The article shows that the higher the influence of experts, the more likely it is that the governance arrangement will be network-based. Article in Journal/Newspaper Iceland Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO) Norway Regulation & Governance
institution Open Polar
collection Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO)
op_collection_id ftoslouniv
language English
description Government responses to the Covid-19 pandemic in the Nordic states—Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, and Sweden—exhibit similarities and differences. This article investigates the extent to which crisis policymaking diverges from normal policymaking within the Nordic countries and whether variations between the countries are associated with the role of expertise and the level of politicization. Government responses are analyzed in terms of governance arrangements and regulatory instruments. Findings demonstrate some deviation from normal policymaking within and considerable variation between the Nordic countries, as Denmark, Finland, and to some extent Norway exhibit similar patterns with hierarchical command and control governance arrangements, while Iceland, in some instances, resembles the case of Sweden, which has made use of network-based governance. The article shows that the higher the influence of experts, the more likely it is that the governance arrangement will be network-based.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Christensen, Tom
Jensen, Mads Dagnis
Kluth, Michael
Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi
Lynggaard, Kennet
Lægreid, Per
Niemikari, Risto
Pierre, Jon
Raunio, Tapio
Adolf Skúlason, Gústaf
spellingShingle Christensen, Tom
Jensen, Mads Dagnis
Kluth, Michael
Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi
Lynggaard, Kennet
Lægreid, Per
Niemikari, Risto
Pierre, Jon
Raunio, Tapio
Adolf Skúlason, Gústaf
The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments
author_facet Christensen, Tom
Jensen, Mads Dagnis
Kluth, Michael
Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi
Lynggaard, Kennet
Lægreid, Per
Niemikari, Risto
Pierre, Jon
Raunio, Tapio
Adolf Skúlason, Gústaf
author_sort Christensen, Tom
title The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments
title_short The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments
title_full The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments
title_fullStr The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments
title_full_unstemmed The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments
title_sort nordic governments' responses to the covid-19 pandemic: a comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments
publishDate 2022
url http://hdl.handle.net/10852/99330
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12497
geographic Norway
geographic_facet Norway
genre Iceland
genre_facet Iceland
op_source 1748-5983
op_relation Christensen, Tom Jensen, Mads Dagnis Kluth, Michael Kristinsson, Gunnar Helgi Lynggaard, Kennet Lægreid, Per Niemikari, Risto Pierre, Jon Raunio, Tapio Adolf Skúlason, Gústaf . The Nordic governments' responses to the Covid-19 pandemic: A comparative study of variation in governance arrangements and regulatory instruments. Regulation & Governance. 2022, 1-19
http://hdl.handle.net/10852/99330
2062755
info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Regulation & Governance&rft.volume=&rft.spage=1&rft.date=2022
Regulation & Governance
1
19
https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12497
op_rights Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC-ND
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12497
container_title Regulation & Governance
_version_ 1766037460636139520