Constructing an 'Old Norwegian Land': Spitsbergen and the early history of Norwegian Arctic Imperialism, 1896-1925.

The history of how it was decided in 1920 that Spitsbergen (Svalbard) should become Norwegian was shaped by the construction of a historical narrative about the loss of a medieval Norwegian empire in the Arctic Ocean, and a political desire to reclaim it. This phenomenon has been commonly referred t...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hustoft, Simen Eriksen
Format: Master Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10852/96428
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-98927
id ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/96428
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/96428 2023-05-15T14:25:52+02:00 Constructing an 'Old Norwegian Land': Spitsbergen and the early history of Norwegian Arctic Imperialism, 1896-1925. Hustoft, Simen Eriksen 2022 http://hdl.handle.net/10852/96428 http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-98927 eng eng http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-98927 Hustoft, Simen Eriksen. Constructing an 'Old Norwegian Land': Spitsbergen and the early history of Norwegian Arctic Imperialism, 1896-1925. Master thesis, University of Oslo, 2022 http://hdl.handle.net/10852/96428 URN:NBN:no-98927 Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/96428/8/MITRA-4095-Master-Thesis---Simen-Eriksen-Hustoft---Spring-2022.pdf Spitsbergen ishavsimperialisme Arctic imperialism treaty Svalbard nationalism Master thesis Masteroppgave 2022 ftoslouniv 2022-09-14T22:35:25Z The history of how it was decided in 1920 that Spitsbergen (Svalbard) should become Norwegian was shaped by the construction of a historical narrative about the loss of a medieval Norwegian empire in the Arctic Ocean, and a political desire to reclaim it. This phenomenon has been commonly referred to as ishavsimperialisme, or Arctic imperialism. This thesis aims to tell the story of Arctic imperialism and the people who supported it. How did they construct a narrative of Spitsbergen belonging to Norway? What influence did they have on the decision to try and gain sovereignty over the archipelago, and on the creation of the Spitsbergen treaty at the Paris Peace Conference in the fall of 1919 until its signing in 1920? Through a broad survey of Norwegian newspaper sources between 1896 – when Fridtjof Nansen’s Fram expedition returned and triggered a debate about a Norwegian annexation of Spitsbergen – and 1925, when Norwegian sovereignty over the archipelago was actualized, as well as transcripts of parliamentary debates and documents from the Norwegian delegation to the Paris Peace Conference, I explore the ideological birth and influence of the Arctic imperialists. I argue that for much of the period, their notion that Spitsbergen was rightfully Norwegian was relatively marginal in the broader public discourse, and that there was a notable degree of reluctance and disinterest towards Spitsbergen. I show that this status quo only changes significantly from 1916, and that by 1918 and the end of the First World War, the combined interests of Arctic imperialists and Norwegian businesses on Spitsbergen convinced the government to work towards sovereignty over the islands. Finally, I explore the relatively negative reactions to the treaty among Arctic imperialists, and show how they struggled but eventually succeeded to create a narrative of the Spitsbergen treaty as a Norwegian triumph. Master Thesis Arctic Arctic Arctic Ocean Svalbard Spitsbergen Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO) Arctic Arctic Ocean Fridtjof ENVELOPE(-56.717,-56.717,-63.567,-63.567) Norway Svalbard
institution Open Polar
collection Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO)
op_collection_id ftoslouniv
language English
topic Spitsbergen
ishavsimperialisme
Arctic imperialism
treaty
Svalbard
nationalism
spellingShingle Spitsbergen
ishavsimperialisme
Arctic imperialism
treaty
Svalbard
nationalism
Hustoft, Simen Eriksen
Constructing an 'Old Norwegian Land': Spitsbergen and the early history of Norwegian Arctic Imperialism, 1896-1925.
topic_facet Spitsbergen
ishavsimperialisme
Arctic imperialism
treaty
Svalbard
nationalism
description The history of how it was decided in 1920 that Spitsbergen (Svalbard) should become Norwegian was shaped by the construction of a historical narrative about the loss of a medieval Norwegian empire in the Arctic Ocean, and a political desire to reclaim it. This phenomenon has been commonly referred to as ishavsimperialisme, or Arctic imperialism. This thesis aims to tell the story of Arctic imperialism and the people who supported it. How did they construct a narrative of Spitsbergen belonging to Norway? What influence did they have on the decision to try and gain sovereignty over the archipelago, and on the creation of the Spitsbergen treaty at the Paris Peace Conference in the fall of 1919 until its signing in 1920? Through a broad survey of Norwegian newspaper sources between 1896 – when Fridtjof Nansen’s Fram expedition returned and triggered a debate about a Norwegian annexation of Spitsbergen – and 1925, when Norwegian sovereignty over the archipelago was actualized, as well as transcripts of parliamentary debates and documents from the Norwegian delegation to the Paris Peace Conference, I explore the ideological birth and influence of the Arctic imperialists. I argue that for much of the period, their notion that Spitsbergen was rightfully Norwegian was relatively marginal in the broader public discourse, and that there was a notable degree of reluctance and disinterest towards Spitsbergen. I show that this status quo only changes significantly from 1916, and that by 1918 and the end of the First World War, the combined interests of Arctic imperialists and Norwegian businesses on Spitsbergen convinced the government to work towards sovereignty over the islands. Finally, I explore the relatively negative reactions to the treaty among Arctic imperialists, and show how they struggled but eventually succeeded to create a narrative of the Spitsbergen treaty as a Norwegian triumph.
format Master Thesis
author Hustoft, Simen Eriksen
author_facet Hustoft, Simen Eriksen
author_sort Hustoft, Simen Eriksen
title Constructing an 'Old Norwegian Land': Spitsbergen and the early history of Norwegian Arctic Imperialism, 1896-1925.
title_short Constructing an 'Old Norwegian Land': Spitsbergen and the early history of Norwegian Arctic Imperialism, 1896-1925.
title_full Constructing an 'Old Norwegian Land': Spitsbergen and the early history of Norwegian Arctic Imperialism, 1896-1925.
title_fullStr Constructing an 'Old Norwegian Land': Spitsbergen and the early history of Norwegian Arctic Imperialism, 1896-1925.
title_full_unstemmed Constructing an 'Old Norwegian Land': Spitsbergen and the early history of Norwegian Arctic Imperialism, 1896-1925.
title_sort constructing an 'old norwegian land': spitsbergen and the early history of norwegian arctic imperialism, 1896-1925.
publishDate 2022
url http://hdl.handle.net/10852/96428
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-98927
long_lat ENVELOPE(-56.717,-56.717,-63.567,-63.567)
geographic Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Fridtjof
Norway
Svalbard
geographic_facet Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Fridtjof
Norway
Svalbard
genre Arctic
Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Svalbard
Spitsbergen
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
Arctic Ocean
Svalbard
Spitsbergen
op_relation http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-98927
Hustoft, Simen Eriksen. Constructing an 'Old Norwegian Land': Spitsbergen and the early history of Norwegian Arctic Imperialism, 1896-1925. Master thesis, University of Oslo, 2022
http://hdl.handle.net/10852/96428
URN:NBN:no-98927
Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/96428/8/MITRA-4095-Master-Thesis---Simen-Eriksen-Hustoft---Spring-2022.pdf
_version_ 1766298347955552256