Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure-Development of "Brim" sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target

The late Eocene Chesapeake Bay impact structure was formed in a multilayered target of seawater underlain sequentially by a sediment layer and a rock layer in a continental-shelf environment. Impact effects in the “brim” (annular trough) surrounding and adjacent to the transient crater, between the...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Dypvik, Henning, Gohn, Gregory, Edwards, Lucy E., Wright, Horton, Powars, David S., Ronald, Litwin
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10852/72195
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-75315
https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE537
id ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/72195
record_format openpolar
institution Open Polar
collection Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO)
op_collection_id ftoslouniv
language English
description The late Eocene Chesapeake Bay impact structure was formed in a multilayered target of seawater underlain sequentially by a sediment layer and a rock layer in a continental-shelf environment. Impact effects in the “brim” (annular trough) surrounding and adjacent to the transient crater, between the transient crater rim and the outer margin, primarily were limited to the target-sediment layer. Analysis of published and new lithostratigraphic, biostratigraphic, sedimentologic, petrologic, and mineralogic studies of three core holes, and published studies of a fourth core hole, provided information for the interpretation of the impact processes, their interactions and relative timing, their resulting products, and sedimentation in the brim. Most studies of marine impact-crater materials have focused on those found in the central crater. There are relatively few large, complex marine craters, of which most display a wide brim around the central crater. However, most have been studied using minimal data sets. The large number of core holes and seismic profiles available for study of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure presents a special opportunity for research. The physical and chronologic records supplied by study of the sediment and rock cores of the Chesapeake Bay impact indicate that the effects of the initial, short-lived contact and compression and excavation stages of the impact event primarily were limited to the transient crater. Only secondary effects of these processes are evident in the brim. The preserved record of the brim was created primarily in the subsequent modification stage. In the brim, the records of early impact processes (e.g., outgoing tsunamis, overturned flap collapse) were modified or removed by later processes. Transported and rotated, large and small clasts of target sediments, and intervals of fluidized sands indicate that seismic shaking fractured and partially fluidized the Cretaceous and Paleogene target sediments, which led to their inward transport by collapse and lateral spreading toward the transient crater. The succeeding inward seawater-resurge flow quickly overtook and interacted with the lateral spreading, further facilitating sediment transport across the brim and into the transient crater. Variations in the cohesion and relative depth of the target sediments controlled their degree of disaggregation and redistribution during these events. Melt clasts and shocked and unshocked rock clasts in the resurge sediments indicate fallout from the ejecta curtain and plume. Basal parautochthonous remnant sections of target Cretaceous sediments in the brim thin toward the collapsed transient crater. Overlying seawater-resurge deposits consist primarily of diamictons that vary laterally in thickness, and vertically and laterally in maximum grain size. After cessation of resurge flow and re-establishment of pre-impact sea level, sandy sediment gravity flows moved from the margin to the center of the partially filled impact structure (shelf basin). The uppermost unit consists of stratified sediments deposited from suspension. Postimpact clayey silts cap the crater fill and record the return to shelf sedimentation at atypically large paleodepths within the shelf basin. An unresolved question involves a section of gravel and sand that overlies Neoproterozoic granite in the inner part of the brim in one core hole. This section may represent previously unrecognized, now parautochthonous Cretaceous sediments lying nonconformably above basement granite, or it may represent target sediments that were moved significant distances by lateral spreading above basement rocks or above a granite megaclast from the overturned flap. The Chesapeake Bay impact structure is perhaps the best documented example of the small group of multilayer, marine-target impacts formed in continental shelves or beneath epeiric seas. The restriction of most impact effects to the target-sediment layer in the area outside the transient cavity, herein called the brim, and the presence of seawater-resurge sediments are characteristic features of this group. Other examples include the Montagnais (offshore Nova Scotia, Canada) and Mjølnir (offshore Norway) impact structures.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Dypvik, Henning
Gohn, Gregory
Edwards, Lucy E.
Wright, Horton
Powars, David S.
Ronald, Litwin
spellingShingle Dypvik, Henning
Gohn, Gregory
Edwards, Lucy E.
Wright, Horton
Powars, David S.
Ronald, Litwin
Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure-Development of "Brim" sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target
author_facet Dypvik, Henning
Gohn, Gregory
Edwards, Lucy E.
Wright, Horton
Powars, David S.
Ronald, Litwin
author_sort Dypvik, Henning
title Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure-Development of "Brim" sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target
title_short Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure-Development of "Brim" sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target
title_full Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure-Development of "Brim" sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target
title_fullStr Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure-Development of "Brim" sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target
title_full_unstemmed Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure-Development of "Brim" sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target
title_sort chesapeake bay impact structure-development of "brim" sedimentation in a multilayered marine target
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10852/72195
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-75315
https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE537
geographic Canada
Norway
geographic_facet Canada
Norway
genre montagnais
genre_facet montagnais
op_source 0072-1077
op_relation http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-75315
Dypvik, Henning Gohn, Gregory Edwards, Lucy E. Wright, Horton Powars, David S. Ronald, Litwin . Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure-Development of "Brim" sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target. Geological Society of America, Special Paper. 2018, 537
http://hdl.handle.net/10852/72195
1611487
info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Geological Society of America, Special Paper&rft.volume=537&rft.spage=&rft.date=2018
Geological Society of America, Special Paper
537
68
https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE537
URN:NBN:no-75315
Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/72195/2/spe537-01.pdf
op_rights Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE537
_version_ 1766070172847702016
spelling ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/72195 2023-05-15T17:13:14+02:00 Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure-Development of "Brim" sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target Dypvik, Henning Gohn, Gregory Edwards, Lucy E. Wright, Horton Powars, David S. Ronald, Litwin 2018-09-20T13:17:10Z http://hdl.handle.net/10852/72195 http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-75315 https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE537 EN eng http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-75315 Dypvik, Henning Gohn, Gregory Edwards, Lucy E. Wright, Horton Powars, David S. Ronald, Litwin . Chesapeake Bay Impact Structure-Development of "Brim" sedimentation in a Multilayered Marine Target. Geological Society of America, Special Paper. 2018, 537 http://hdl.handle.net/10852/72195 1611487 info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Geological Society of America, Special Paper&rft.volume=537&rft.spage=&rft.date=2018 Geological Society of America, Special Paper 537 68 https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE537 URN:NBN:no-75315 Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/72195/2/spe537-01.pdf Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ CC-BY 0072-1077 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed PublishedVersion 2018 ftoslouniv https://doi.org/10.1130/SPE537 2020-06-21T08:53:06Z The late Eocene Chesapeake Bay impact structure was formed in a multilayered target of seawater underlain sequentially by a sediment layer and a rock layer in a continental-shelf environment. Impact effects in the “brim” (annular trough) surrounding and adjacent to the transient crater, between the transient crater rim and the outer margin, primarily were limited to the target-sediment layer. Analysis of published and new lithostratigraphic, biostratigraphic, sedimentologic, petrologic, and mineralogic studies of three core holes, and published studies of a fourth core hole, provided information for the interpretation of the impact processes, their interactions and relative timing, their resulting products, and sedimentation in the brim. Most studies of marine impact-crater materials have focused on those found in the central crater. There are relatively few large, complex marine craters, of which most display a wide brim around the central crater. However, most have been studied using minimal data sets. The large number of core holes and seismic profiles available for study of the Chesapeake Bay impact structure presents a special opportunity for research. The physical and chronologic records supplied by study of the sediment and rock cores of the Chesapeake Bay impact indicate that the effects of the initial, short-lived contact and compression and excavation stages of the impact event primarily were limited to the transient crater. Only secondary effects of these processes are evident in the brim. The preserved record of the brim was created primarily in the subsequent modification stage. In the brim, the records of early impact processes (e.g., outgoing tsunamis, overturned flap collapse) were modified or removed by later processes. Transported and rotated, large and small clasts of target sediments, and intervals of fluidized sands indicate that seismic shaking fractured and partially fluidized the Cretaceous and Paleogene target sediments, which led to their inward transport by collapse and lateral spreading toward the transient crater. The succeeding inward seawater-resurge flow quickly overtook and interacted with the lateral spreading, further facilitating sediment transport across the brim and into the transient crater. Variations in the cohesion and relative depth of the target sediments controlled their degree of disaggregation and redistribution during these events. Melt clasts and shocked and unshocked rock clasts in the resurge sediments indicate fallout from the ejecta curtain and plume. Basal parautochthonous remnant sections of target Cretaceous sediments in the brim thin toward the collapsed transient crater. Overlying seawater-resurge deposits consist primarily of diamictons that vary laterally in thickness, and vertically and laterally in maximum grain size. After cessation of resurge flow and re-establishment of pre-impact sea level, sandy sediment gravity flows moved from the margin to the center of the partially filled impact structure (shelf basin). The uppermost unit consists of stratified sediments deposited from suspension. Postimpact clayey silts cap the crater fill and record the return to shelf sedimentation at atypically large paleodepths within the shelf basin. An unresolved question involves a section of gravel and sand that overlies Neoproterozoic granite in the inner part of the brim in one core hole. This section may represent previously unrecognized, now parautochthonous Cretaceous sediments lying nonconformably above basement granite, or it may represent target sediments that were moved significant distances by lateral spreading above basement rocks or above a granite megaclast from the overturned flap. The Chesapeake Bay impact structure is perhaps the best documented example of the small group of multilayer, marine-target impacts formed in continental shelves or beneath epeiric seas. The restriction of most impact effects to the target-sediment layer in the area outside the transient cavity, herein called the brim, and the presence of seawater-resurge sediments are characteristic features of this group. Other examples include the Montagnais (offshore Nova Scotia, Canada) and Mjølnir (offshore Norway) impact structures. Article in Journal/Newspaper montagnais Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO) Canada Norway