Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod

The use of genetic markers under putative selection in population studies carries the potential for erroneous identification of populations and misassignment of individuals to population of origin. Selected markers are nevertheless attractive, especially in marine organisms that are characterized by...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecology and Evolution
Main Authors: Jorde, Per Erik, Synnes, Ann-Elin, Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg, Sodeland, Marte, Knutsen, Halvor
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10852/67921
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-71082
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4648
id ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/67921
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/67921 2023-05-15T15:27:18+02:00 Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod Jorde, Per Erik Synnes, Ann-Elin Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg Sodeland, Marte Knutsen, Halvor 2018-10-15T08:35:36Z http://hdl.handle.net/10852/67921 http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-71082 https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4648 EN eng NFR/21610 http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-71082 Jorde, Per Erik Synnes, Ann-Elin Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg Sodeland, Marte Knutsen, Halvor . Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod. Ecology and Evolution. 2018, 8, 12547-12558 http://hdl.handle.net/10852/67921 1620282 info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Ecology and Evolution&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=12547&rft.date=2018 Ecology and Evolution 8 12547 12558 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4648 URN:NBN:no-71082 Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/67921/2/jorde_et_al_2018c.pdf Attribution 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ CC-BY 2045-7758 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed PublishedVersion 2018 ftoslouniv https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4648 2020-06-21T08:53:06Z The use of genetic markers under putative selection in population studies carries the potential for erroneous identification of populations and misassignment of individuals to population of origin. Selected markers are nevertheless attractive, especially in marine organisms that are characterized by weak population structure at neutral loci. Highly fecund species may tolerate the cost of strong selective mortality during early life stages, potentially leading to a shift in offspring genotypes away from the parental proportions. In Atlantic cod, recent genetic studies have uncovered different genotype clusters apparently representing phenotypically cryptic populations that coexist in coastal waters. Here, we tested if a high‐graded SNP panel specifically designed to classify individual cod to population of origin may be unreliable because of natural selection acting on the SNPs or their linked background. Temporal samples of cod were collected from two fjords, starting at the earliest life stage (pelagic eggs) and carried on until late autumn (bottom‐settled juveniles), covering the period during summer of high natural mortality. Despite the potential for selective mortality during the study period, we found no evidence for selection, as both cod types occurred throughout the season, already in the earliest egg samples, and there was no evidence for a shift during the season in the proportions of one or the other type. We conclude that high‐graded marker panels under putative natural selection represent a valid and useful tool for identifying biological population structure in this highly fecund species and presumably in others. Article in Journal/Newspaper atlantic cod Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO) Ecology and Evolution 8 24 12547 12558
institution Open Polar
collection Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO)
op_collection_id ftoslouniv
language English
description The use of genetic markers under putative selection in population studies carries the potential for erroneous identification of populations and misassignment of individuals to population of origin. Selected markers are nevertheless attractive, especially in marine organisms that are characterized by weak population structure at neutral loci. Highly fecund species may tolerate the cost of strong selective mortality during early life stages, potentially leading to a shift in offspring genotypes away from the parental proportions. In Atlantic cod, recent genetic studies have uncovered different genotype clusters apparently representing phenotypically cryptic populations that coexist in coastal waters. Here, we tested if a high‐graded SNP panel specifically designed to classify individual cod to population of origin may be unreliable because of natural selection acting on the SNPs or their linked background. Temporal samples of cod were collected from two fjords, starting at the earliest life stage (pelagic eggs) and carried on until late autumn (bottom‐settled juveniles), covering the period during summer of high natural mortality. Despite the potential for selective mortality during the study period, we found no evidence for selection, as both cod types occurred throughout the season, already in the earliest egg samples, and there was no evidence for a shift during the season in the proportions of one or the other type. We conclude that high‐graded marker panels under putative natural selection represent a valid and useful tool for identifying biological population structure in this highly fecund species and presumably in others.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Jorde, Per Erik
Synnes, Ann-Elin
Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg
Sodeland, Marte
Knutsen, Halvor
spellingShingle Jorde, Per Erik
Synnes, Ann-Elin
Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg
Sodeland, Marte
Knutsen, Halvor
Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
author_facet Jorde, Per Erik
Synnes, Ann-Elin
Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg
Sodeland, Marte
Knutsen, Halvor
author_sort Jorde, Per Erik
title Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
title_short Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
title_full Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
title_fullStr Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
title_full_unstemmed Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod
title_sort can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? evidence from coastal atlantic cod
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10852/67921
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-71082
https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4648
genre atlantic cod
genre_facet atlantic cod
op_source 2045-7758
op_relation NFR/21610
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-71082
Jorde, Per Erik Synnes, Ann-Elin Espeland, Sigurd Heiberg Sodeland, Marte Knutsen, Halvor . Can we rely on selected genetic markers for population identification? Evidence from coastal Atlantic cod. Ecology and Evolution. 2018, 8, 12547-12558
http://hdl.handle.net/10852/67921
1620282
info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Ecology and Evolution&rft.volume=8&rft.spage=12547&rft.date=2018
Ecology and Evolution
8
12547
12558
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4648
URN:NBN:no-71082
Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/67921/2/jorde_et_al_2018c.pdf
op_rights Attribution 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.4648
container_title Ecology and Evolution
container_volume 8
container_issue 24
container_start_page 12547
op_container_end_page 12558
_version_ 1766357756466429952