Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study

Objective: To evaluate the responsiveness of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score compared with other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), inflammatory markers and clinical disease activity measures in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Disease-modifying...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:RMD Open
Main Authors: Holten, Karen, Sexton, Joseph, Kvien, Tore Kristian, Aga, Anna-Birgitte, Haavardsholm, Espen A.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: BMJ Group 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10852/66201
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-69426
https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754
id ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/66201
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/66201 2023-05-15T14:27:44+02:00 Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study Holten, Karen Sexton, Joseph Kvien, Tore Kristian Aga, Anna-Birgitte Haavardsholm, Espen A. 2018-12-18T11:00:11Z http://hdl.handle.net/10852/66201 http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-69426 https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754 EN eng BMJ Group http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-69426 Holten, Karen Sexton, Joseph Kvien, Tore Kristian Aga, Anna-Birgitte Haavardsholm, Espen A. . Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study. RMD Open. 2018, 4(2) http://hdl.handle.net/10852/66201 1644731 info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=RMD Open&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=&rft.date=2018 RMD Open 4 2 6 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754 URN:NBN:no-69426 Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/66201/2/e000754.full.pd.pdf Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ CC-BY-NC 2056-5933 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel Peer reviewed PublishedVersion 2018 ftoslouniv https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754 2020-06-21T08:52:47Z Objective: To evaluate the responsiveness of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score compared with other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), inflammatory markers and clinical disease activity measures in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug–naïve patients with RA with short disease duration were included in the treat-to-target ARCTIC trial and followed for 24 months. The responsiveness of the RAID score was evaluated using standardised response mean (SRM) and relative efficiency (RE) with respect to tender joints by Ritchie Articular Index (RAI). SRMs and REs were also calculated for other PROMs, inflammatory markers and clinical outcome measures. An SRM with value above 0.80 was considered high. Results: 230 patients with RA were included. The mean±SD symptom duration was 7.1±5.4 months and the baseline mean±SD RAID score was 4.49±2.14. At 3 months of follow-up, the mean±SD change score for RAID was −2.25±1.98 and the SRM (95% CI) −1.13 (−1.33 to −0.96). The RAID score showed high responsiveness both at 3 and 6 months (SRM≥0.80) and was more sensitive in detecting change than the reference, tender joints assessed by RAI. Conclusions: The RAID score proved to be highly responsive to change in patients with RA with short disease duration who followed a treat-to-target strategy. The RAID score was more efficient in detecting change than the reference (RAI) as well as most other PROMs. Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Arctic Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO) Arctic Ritchie ENVELOPE(-128.387,-128.387,54.916,54.916) RMD Open 4 2 e000754
institution Open Polar
collection Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO)
op_collection_id ftoslouniv
language English
description Objective: To evaluate the responsiveness of the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease (RAID) score compared with other patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), inflammatory markers and clinical disease activity measures in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Disease-modifying antirheumatic drug–naïve patients with RA with short disease duration were included in the treat-to-target ARCTIC trial and followed for 24 months. The responsiveness of the RAID score was evaluated using standardised response mean (SRM) and relative efficiency (RE) with respect to tender joints by Ritchie Articular Index (RAI). SRMs and REs were also calculated for other PROMs, inflammatory markers and clinical outcome measures. An SRM with value above 0.80 was considered high. Results: 230 patients with RA were included. The mean±SD symptom duration was 7.1±5.4 months and the baseline mean±SD RAID score was 4.49±2.14. At 3 months of follow-up, the mean±SD change score for RAID was −2.25±1.98 and the SRM (95% CI) −1.13 (−1.33 to −0.96). The RAID score showed high responsiveness both at 3 and 6 months (SRM≥0.80) and was more sensitive in detecting change than the reference, tender joints assessed by RAI. Conclusions: The RAID score proved to be highly responsive to change in patients with RA with short disease duration who followed a treat-to-target strategy. The RAID score was more efficient in detecting change than the reference (RAI) as well as most other PROMs.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Holten, Karen
Sexton, Joseph
Kvien, Tore Kristian
Aga, Anna-Birgitte
Haavardsholm, Espen A.
spellingShingle Holten, Karen
Sexton, Joseph
Kvien, Tore Kristian
Aga, Anna-Birgitte
Haavardsholm, Espen A.
Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
author_facet Holten, Karen
Sexton, Joseph
Kvien, Tore Kristian
Aga, Anna-Birgitte
Haavardsholm, Espen A.
author_sort Holten, Karen
title Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
title_short Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
title_full Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
title_fullStr Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study
title_sort comparative analyses of responsiveness between the rheumatoid arthritis impact of disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the arctic study
publisher BMJ Group
publishDate 2018
url http://hdl.handle.net/10852/66201
http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-69426
https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754
long_lat ENVELOPE(-128.387,-128.387,54.916,54.916)
geographic Arctic
Ritchie
geographic_facet Arctic
Ritchie
genre Arctic
Arctic
genre_facet Arctic
Arctic
op_source 2056-5933
op_relation http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-69426
Holten, Karen Sexton, Joseph Kvien, Tore Kristian Aga, Anna-Birgitte Haavardsholm, Espen A. . Comparative analyses of responsiveness between the Rheumatoid Arthritis Impact of Disease score, other patient-reported outcomes and disease activity measures: secondary analyses from the ARCTIC study. RMD Open. 2018, 4(2)
http://hdl.handle.net/10852/66201
1644731
info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=RMD Open&rft.volume=4&rft.spage=&rft.date=2018
RMD Open
4
2
6
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754
URN:NBN:no-69426
Fulltext https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/66201/2/e000754.full.pd.pdf
op_rights Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
op_rightsnorm CC-BY-NC
op_doi https://doi.org/10.1136/rmdopen-2018-000754
container_title RMD Open
container_volume 4
container_issue 2
container_start_page e000754
_version_ 1766301623067344896