Applying the Eddy Covariance Method Under Difficult Conditions.
We assess how reliable the Eddy-Covariance (EC) method is in estimating surface fluxes under the difficult conditions that occur in the high Arctic. Emphasis is placed on stable stratification and the breakdown of EC assumptions that may occur in such a regime. To investigate these difficulties we d...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Master Thesis |
| Language: | Norwegian |
| Published: |
2015
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://hdl.handle.net/10852/45561 http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-49788 |
| Summary: | We assess how reliable the Eddy-Covariance (EC) method is in estimating surface fluxes under the difficult conditions that occur in the high Arctic. Emphasis is placed on stable stratification and the breakdown of EC assumptions that may occur in such a regime. To investigate these difficulties we developed an EC processing module from scratch, providing an extensive and transparent overview of the EC method. Raw data was obtained from an open path EC system located in the Bayelva catchment near Ny Ålesund (79°N), Svalbard, Norway. Our flux estimates are in reasonable agreement with those found from the standardized EC package TK2. Strong relative non-stationarity represents the greatest hindrance to data quality at Bayelva, occurring for 11% of the data period. Overall, average relative flux uncertainties were found to be 20% for both the sensible (SH) and latent heat (LH) flux. Under stable stratification these uncertainties were considerably higher, 27% on average. Through Ogive classification we found that the traditional 30 minute SH and LH fluxes converged (resolved the turbulent cospectrum) 70% of the time. Here too the stable regime stands out, with low convergence fractions of 41% and 48% for LH and SH, respectively. To our knowledge it is the first time such an analysis has been carried out in the Arctic. Concluding, while usually successful for neutral and unstable conditions, the traditional 30 minute flux averaging period is, more often than not, poorly suited for the stable regime. We attribute this to the observed and predicted shift in cospectral peaks towards lower periods under stable stratification, along with an erosion of the cospectral gap. An apparently simple fix of reducing the averaging period is not generally a valid solution. The required reduction could introduce unacceptable levels of flux uncertainty. We assess how reliable the Eddy-Covariance (EC) method is in estimating surface fluxes under the difficult conditions that occur in the high Arctic. Emphasis is placed on stable stratification and the breakdown of EC assumptions that may occur in such a regime. To investigate these difficulties we developed an EC processing module from scratch, providing an extensive and transparent overview of the EC method. Raw data was obtained from an open path EC system located in the Bayelva catchment near Ny Ålesund (79°N), Svalbard, Norway. Our flux estimates are in reasonable agreement with those found from the standardized EC package TK2. Strong relative non-stationarity represents the greatest hindrance to data quality at Bayelva, occurring for 11% of the data period. Overall, average relative flux uncertainties were found to be 20% for both the sensible (SH) and latent heat (LH) flux. Under stable stratification these uncertainties were considerably higher, 27% on average. Through Ogive classification we found that the traditional 30 minute SH and LH fluxes converged (resolved the turbulent cospectrum) 70% of the time. Here too the stable regime stands out, with low convergence fractions of 41% and 48% for LH and SH, respectively. To our knowledge it is the first time such an analysis has been carried out in the Arctic. Concluding, while usually successful for neutral and unstable conditions, the traditional 30 minute flux averaging period is, more often than not, poorly suited for the stable regime. We attribute this to the observed and predicted shift in cospectral peaks towards lower periods under stable stratification, along with an erosion of the cospectral gap. An apparently simple fix of reducing the averaging period is not generally a valid solution. The required reduction could introduce unacceptable levels of flux uncertainty. |
|---|