Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950

The paper examines the use of rebus sic stantibus, a claim that a fundamental change of circumstances warrants withdrawal or termination of a treaty, by Russia in three key episodes in Russian foreign policy. These episodes have not been examined together by scholars and have not all been analysed f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Published in:German Yearbook of International Law
Main Author: Møinichen Leonhardsen, Erlend
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
Published: Duncker & Humblot 2022
Subjects:
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10852/101622
https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581
id ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/101622
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoslouniv:oai:www.duo.uio.no:10852/101622 2023-05-15T18:29:49+02:00 Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 ENEngelskEnglishPride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950 Møinichen Leonhardsen, Erlend 2022-10-10T13:59:33Z http://hdl.handle.net/10852/101622 https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 EN eng Duncker & Humblot Møinichen Leonhardsen, Erlend . Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950. Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht. 2022, 63(1), 581-620 http://hdl.handle.net/10852/101622 2060108 info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht&rft.volume=63&rft.spage=581&rft.date=2022 Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht 63 1 581 620 https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 0344-3094 Journal article Tidsskriftartikkel SubmittedVersion 2022 ftoslouniv https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581 2023-03-22T23:36:58Z The paper examines the use of rebus sic stantibus, a claim that a fundamental change of circumstances warrants withdrawal or termination of a treaty, by Russia in three key episodes in Russian foreign policy. These episodes have not been examined together by scholars and have not all been analysed from the perspective of rebus sic stantibus. First, it examines the situation in 1870 when Russia used this approach to obtain the London Declaration, which revised unfavourable terms in the 1856 Treaty of Paris following the Crimean War. Second, it examines the Soviet attempt to terminate or renegotiate the Montreux Convention during and in the aftermath of the Second World War through the use of rebus sic stantibus and, third, it examines the Soviet attempt to renegotiate the Svalbard Treaty through the use of this legal approach. Notably, the analysis shows that these attempts took place during shifts in Russia’s relative power. Given the design of the treaties in question, rebus sic stantibus was one of the only ways to achieve these goals. In addition to providing a thorough study of episodes unexamined from an international legal perspective, the paper may therefore shed light on when rebus sic stantibus is useful and why it is relied on less and less by states today. Article in Journal/Newspaper Svalbard Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO) Perseverance ENVELOPE(162.200,162.200,-76.800,-76.800) Svalbard German Yearbook of International Law 63 1 581 620
institution Open Polar
collection Universitet i Oslo: Digitale utgivelser ved UiO (DUO)
op_collection_id ftoslouniv
language English
description The paper examines the use of rebus sic stantibus, a claim that a fundamental change of circumstances warrants withdrawal or termination of a treaty, by Russia in three key episodes in Russian foreign policy. These episodes have not been examined together by scholars and have not all been analysed from the perspective of rebus sic stantibus. First, it examines the situation in 1870 when Russia used this approach to obtain the London Declaration, which revised unfavourable terms in the 1856 Treaty of Paris following the Crimean War. Second, it examines the Soviet attempt to terminate or renegotiate the Montreux Convention during and in the aftermath of the Second World War through the use of rebus sic stantibus and, third, it examines the Soviet attempt to renegotiate the Svalbard Treaty through the use of this legal approach. Notably, the analysis shows that these attempts took place during shifts in Russia’s relative power. Given the design of the treaties in question, rebus sic stantibus was one of the only ways to achieve these goals. In addition to providing a thorough study of episodes unexamined from an international legal perspective, the paper may therefore shed light on when rebus sic stantibus is useful and why it is relied on less and less by states today.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Møinichen Leonhardsen, Erlend
spellingShingle Møinichen Leonhardsen, Erlend
Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
author_facet Møinichen Leonhardsen, Erlend
author_sort Møinichen Leonhardsen, Erlend
title Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
title_short Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
title_full Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
title_fullStr Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
title_full_unstemmed Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950
title_sort pride and perseverance: strategic use of rebus sic stantibus in russian foreign policy 1870 – 1950
publisher Duncker & Humblot
publishDate 2022
url http://hdl.handle.net/10852/101622
https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581
long_lat ENVELOPE(162.200,162.200,-76.800,-76.800)
geographic Perseverance
Svalbard
geographic_facet Perseverance
Svalbard
genre Svalbard
genre_facet Svalbard
op_source 0344-3094
op_relation Møinichen Leonhardsen, Erlend . Pride and Perseverance: Strategic Use of Rebus Sic Stantibus in Russian Foreign Policy 1870 – 1950. Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht. 2022, 63(1), 581-620
http://hdl.handle.net/10852/101622
2060108
info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.jtitle=Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht&rft.volume=63&rft.spage=581&rft.date=2022
Jahrbuch für Internationales Recht
63
1
581
620
https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581
op_doi https://doi.org/10.3790/gyil.63.1.581
container_title German Yearbook of International Law
container_volume 63
container_issue 1
container_start_page 581
op_container_end_page 620
_version_ 1766213224761393152