Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” remediation options : The GREENLAND Project

Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based meth...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: CUNDY, Andy, BARDOS, Paul, PUSCHENREITER, Markus, WITTERS, Nele, MENCH, Michel, BERT, Valérie, FRIESL-HANL, Wolfgang, MULLER, Ingo, WEYENS, Nele, VANGRONSVELD, Jaco
Format: Other/Unknown Material
Language:English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/158075
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12278/158075
https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435
id ftoskarbordeaux:oai:oskar-bordeaux.fr:20.500.12278/158075
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoskarbordeaux:oai:oskar-bordeaux.fr:20.500.12278/158075 2023-05-15T16:28:39+02:00 Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” remediation options : The GREENLAND Project CUNDY, Andy BARDOS, Paul PUSCHENREITER, Markus WITTERS, Nele MENCH, Michel BERT, Valérie FRIESL-HANL, Wolfgang MULLER, Ingo WEYENS, Nele VANGRONSVELD, Jaco 2015 https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/158075 https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12278/158075 https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435 en eng 1520-6831 https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/158075 doi:10.1002/rem.21435 Sciences de l'environnement Article de revue 2015 ftoskarbordeaux https://doi.org/20.500.12278/158075 https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435 2022-10-18T22:34:42Z Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based methods, with or without chemical soil additives or amendments, for reducing contaminant transfer to local receptors by in situ stabilization, or extraction, transformation, or degradation of contaminants. Despite offering strong benefits in terms of risk management, deployment costs, and sustainability for a range of site problems, the application of GRO as practical on-site remedial solutions is still in its relative infancy, particularly for metal(loid)-contaminated sites. A key barrier to wider adoption of GRO relates to general uncertainties and lack of stakeholder confidence in (and indeed knowledge of) the feasibility or reliability of GRO as practical risk management solutions. The GREENLAND project has therefore developed a simple and transparent decision support framework for promoting the appropriate use of gentle remediation options and encouraging participation of stakeholders, supplemented by a set of specific design aids for use when GRO appear to be a viable option. The framework is presented as a three phased model or Decision Support Tool (DST), in the form of a Microsoft Excel-based workbook, designed to inform decision-making and options appraisal during the selection of remedial approaches for contaminated sites. The DST acts as a simple decision support and stakeholder engagement tool for the application of GRO, providing a context for GRO application (particularly where soft end-use of remediated land is envisaged), quick reference tables (including an economic cost calculator), and supporting information and technical guidance drawing on practical examples of effective GRO application at trace metal(loid) contaminated sites across Europe. This article introduces the decision support framework. Other/Unknown Material Greenland OSKAR Bordeaux (Open Science Knowledge ARchive) Greenland
institution Open Polar
collection OSKAR Bordeaux (Open Science Knowledge ARchive)
op_collection_id ftoskarbordeaux
language English
topic Sciences de l'environnement
spellingShingle Sciences de l'environnement
CUNDY, Andy
BARDOS, Paul
PUSCHENREITER, Markus
WITTERS, Nele
MENCH, Michel
BERT, Valérie
FRIESL-HANL, Wolfgang
MULLER, Ingo
WEYENS, Nele
VANGRONSVELD, Jaco
Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” remediation options : The GREENLAND Project
topic_facet Sciences de l'environnement
description Gentle remediation options (GRO) are risk management strategies/technologies that result in a net gain (or at least no gross reduction) in soil function as well as risk management. They encompass a number of technologies, including the use of plant (phyto-), fungi (myco-), and/or bacteria-based methods, with or without chemical soil additives or amendments, for reducing contaminant transfer to local receptors by in situ stabilization, or extraction, transformation, or degradation of contaminants. Despite offering strong benefits in terms of risk management, deployment costs, and sustainability for a range of site problems, the application of GRO as practical on-site remedial solutions is still in its relative infancy, particularly for metal(loid)-contaminated sites. A key barrier to wider adoption of GRO relates to general uncertainties and lack of stakeholder confidence in (and indeed knowledge of) the feasibility or reliability of GRO as practical risk management solutions. The GREENLAND project has therefore developed a simple and transparent decision support framework for promoting the appropriate use of gentle remediation options and encouraging participation of stakeholders, supplemented by a set of specific design aids for use when GRO appear to be a viable option. The framework is presented as a three phased model or Decision Support Tool (DST), in the form of a Microsoft Excel-based workbook, designed to inform decision-making and options appraisal during the selection of remedial approaches for contaminated sites. The DST acts as a simple decision support and stakeholder engagement tool for the application of GRO, providing a context for GRO application (particularly where soft end-use of remediated land is envisaged), quick reference tables (including an economic cost calculator), and supporting information and technical guidance drawing on practical examples of effective GRO application at trace metal(loid) contaminated sites across Europe. This article introduces the decision support framework.
format Other/Unknown Material
author CUNDY, Andy
BARDOS, Paul
PUSCHENREITER, Markus
WITTERS, Nele
MENCH, Michel
BERT, Valérie
FRIESL-HANL, Wolfgang
MULLER, Ingo
WEYENS, Nele
VANGRONSVELD, Jaco
author_facet CUNDY, Andy
BARDOS, Paul
PUSCHENREITER, Markus
WITTERS, Nele
MENCH, Michel
BERT, Valérie
FRIESL-HANL, Wolfgang
MULLER, Ingo
WEYENS, Nele
VANGRONSVELD, Jaco
author_sort CUNDY, Andy
title Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” remediation options : The GREENLAND Project
title_short Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” remediation options : The GREENLAND Project
title_full Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” remediation options : The GREENLAND Project
title_fullStr Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” remediation options : The GREENLAND Project
title_full_unstemmed Developing effective decision support for the application of “Gentle” remediation options : The GREENLAND Project
title_sort developing effective decision support for the application of “gentle” remediation options : the greenland project
publishDate 2015
url https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/158075
https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12278/158075
https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435
geographic Greenland
geographic_facet Greenland
genre Greenland
genre_facet Greenland
op_relation 1520-6831
https://oskar-bordeaux.fr/handle/20.500.12278/158075
doi:10.1002/rem.21435
op_doi https://doi.org/20.500.12278/158075
https://doi.org/10.1002/rem.21435
_version_ 1766018334159011840