Modeling the detection range of fish by echolocating bottlenose dolphins and harbor porpoises

The target strength as a function of aspect angle were measured for four species of fish using dolphin-like and porpoise-like echolocation signals. The polar diagram of target strength values measured from an energy flux density perspective showed considerably less fluctuation with azimuth than woul...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Au, Whitlow W. L., Benoit-Bird, Kelly J., Kastelein, Ronald A.
Other Authors: College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
unknown
Published: Acoustical Society of America
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/ws859m297
id ftoregonstate:ir.library.oregonstate.edu:ws859m297
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoregonstate:ir.library.oregonstate.edu:ws859m297 2024-09-15T17:55:32+00:00 Modeling the detection range of fish by echolocating bottlenose dolphins and harbor porpoises Au, Whitlow W. L. Benoit-Bird, Kelly J. Kastelein, Ronald A. College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/ws859m297 English [eng] eng unknown Acoustical Society of America https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/ws859m297 Copyright Not Evaluated Article ftoregonstate 2024-07-22T18:06:06Z The target strength as a function of aspect angle were measured for four species of fish using dolphin-like and porpoise-like echolocation signals. The polar diagram of target strength values measured from an energy flux density perspective showed considerably less fluctuation with azimuth than would a pure tone pulse. Using detection range data obtained from dolphin and porpoise echolocation experiments, the detection ranges for the Atlantic cod by echolocating dolphins and porpoises were calculated for three aspect angles of the cod. Maximum detection ranges occurred when the fish was broadside to the odontocete and minimum detection ranges occurred when the cod was in the tail aspect. Maximum and minimum detection ranges for the bottlenose dolphin in a noise-limited environment was calculated to be 93 and 70 m, respectively. In a quiet environment, maximum and minimum detection ranges for the bottlenose dolphin were calculated to be 173 and 107 m, respectively. The detection ranges for the harbor porpoise in a quiet environment were calculated to be between 15 and 27 m. The primary reason for the large differences in detection ranges between both species was attributed to the 36 dB higher source level of the bottlenose dolphin echolocation signals. Keywords: bioacoustics, mechanoception, acoustic signal detection, biocommunications Article in Journal/Newspaper atlantic cod ScholarsArchive@OSU (Oregon State University)
institution Open Polar
collection ScholarsArchive@OSU (Oregon State University)
op_collection_id ftoregonstate
language English
unknown
description The target strength as a function of aspect angle were measured for four species of fish using dolphin-like and porpoise-like echolocation signals. The polar diagram of target strength values measured from an energy flux density perspective showed considerably less fluctuation with azimuth than would a pure tone pulse. Using detection range data obtained from dolphin and porpoise echolocation experiments, the detection ranges for the Atlantic cod by echolocating dolphins and porpoises were calculated for three aspect angles of the cod. Maximum detection ranges occurred when the fish was broadside to the odontocete and minimum detection ranges occurred when the cod was in the tail aspect. Maximum and minimum detection ranges for the bottlenose dolphin in a noise-limited environment was calculated to be 93 and 70 m, respectively. In a quiet environment, maximum and minimum detection ranges for the bottlenose dolphin were calculated to be 173 and 107 m, respectively. The detection ranges for the harbor porpoise in a quiet environment were calculated to be between 15 and 27 m. The primary reason for the large differences in detection ranges between both species was attributed to the 36 dB higher source level of the bottlenose dolphin echolocation signals. Keywords: bioacoustics, mechanoception, acoustic signal detection, biocommunications
author2 College of Oceanic and Atmospheric Sciences
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Au, Whitlow W. L.
Benoit-Bird, Kelly J.
Kastelein, Ronald A.
spellingShingle Au, Whitlow W. L.
Benoit-Bird, Kelly J.
Kastelein, Ronald A.
Modeling the detection range of fish by echolocating bottlenose dolphins and harbor porpoises
author_facet Au, Whitlow W. L.
Benoit-Bird, Kelly J.
Kastelein, Ronald A.
author_sort Au, Whitlow W. L.
title Modeling the detection range of fish by echolocating bottlenose dolphins and harbor porpoises
title_short Modeling the detection range of fish by echolocating bottlenose dolphins and harbor porpoises
title_full Modeling the detection range of fish by echolocating bottlenose dolphins and harbor porpoises
title_fullStr Modeling the detection range of fish by echolocating bottlenose dolphins and harbor porpoises
title_full_unstemmed Modeling the detection range of fish by echolocating bottlenose dolphins and harbor porpoises
title_sort modeling the detection range of fish by echolocating bottlenose dolphins and harbor porpoises
publisher Acoustical Society of America
url https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/ws859m297
genre atlantic cod
genre_facet atlantic cod
op_relation https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/ws859m297
op_rights Copyright Not Evaluated
_version_ 1810431803045969920