Analysis of Energy Flow in US GLOBEC Ecosystems Using End-to-End Models

End-to-end models were constructed to examine and compare the trophic structure and energy flow in coastal shelf ecosystems of four US Global Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics (GLOBEC) study regions: the Northern California Current, the Central Gulf of Alaska, Georges Bank, and the Southwestern Antarctic Pen...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Ruzicka, James J., Steele, John H., Gaichas, Sarah K., Ballerini, Tosca, Gifford, Dian J., Brodeur, Richard D., Hofmann, Eileen E.
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
unknown
Published: Oceanography Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/cf95jd18k
id ftoregonstate:ir.library.oregonstate.edu:cf95jd18k
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoregonstate:ir.library.oregonstate.edu:cf95jd18k 2024-09-15T17:47:04+00:00 Analysis of Energy Flow in US GLOBEC Ecosystems Using End-to-End Models Ruzicka, James J. Steele, John H. Gaichas, Sarah K. Ballerini, Tosca Gifford, Dian J. Brodeur, Richard D. Hofmann, Eileen E. https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/cf95jd18k English [eng] eng unknown Oceanography Society https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/cf95jd18k Copyright Not Evaluated Article ftoregonstate 2024-07-22T18:06:05Z End-to-end models were constructed to examine and compare the trophic structure and energy flow in coastal shelf ecosystems of four US Global Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics (GLOBEC) study regions: the Northern California Current, the Central Gulf of Alaska, Georges Bank, and the Southwestern Antarctic Peninsula. High-quality data collected on system components and processes over the life of the program were used as input to the models. Although the US GLOBEC program was species-centric, focused on the study of a selected set of target species of ecological or economic importance, we took a broader community-level approach to describe end-to-end energy flow, from nutrient input to fishery production. We built four end-to-end models that were structured similarly in terms of functional group composition and time scale. The models were used to identify the mid-trophic level groups that place the greatest demand on lower trophic level production while providing the greatest support to higher trophic level production. In general, euphausiids and planktivorous forage fishes were the critical energy-transfer nodes; however, some differences between ecosystems are apparent. For example, squid provide an important alternative energy pathway to forage fish, moderating the effects of changes to forage fish abundance in scenario analyses in the Central Gulf of Alaska. In the Northern California Current, large scyphozoan jellyfish are important consumers of plankton production, but can divert energy from the rest of the food web when abundant. Article in Journal/Newspaper Antarc* Antarctic Antarctic Peninsula Alaska ScholarsArchive@OSU (Oregon State University)
institution Open Polar
collection ScholarsArchive@OSU (Oregon State University)
op_collection_id ftoregonstate
language English
unknown
description End-to-end models were constructed to examine and compare the trophic structure and energy flow in coastal shelf ecosystems of four US Global Ocean Ecosystem Dynamics (GLOBEC) study regions: the Northern California Current, the Central Gulf of Alaska, Georges Bank, and the Southwestern Antarctic Peninsula. High-quality data collected on system components and processes over the life of the program were used as input to the models. Although the US GLOBEC program was species-centric, focused on the study of a selected set of target species of ecological or economic importance, we took a broader community-level approach to describe end-to-end energy flow, from nutrient input to fishery production. We built four end-to-end models that were structured similarly in terms of functional group composition and time scale. The models were used to identify the mid-trophic level groups that place the greatest demand on lower trophic level production while providing the greatest support to higher trophic level production. In general, euphausiids and planktivorous forage fishes were the critical energy-transfer nodes; however, some differences between ecosystems are apparent. For example, squid provide an important alternative energy pathway to forage fish, moderating the effects of changes to forage fish abundance in scenario analyses in the Central Gulf of Alaska. In the Northern California Current, large scyphozoan jellyfish are important consumers of plankton production, but can divert energy from the rest of the food web when abundant.
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Ruzicka, James J.
Steele, John H.
Gaichas, Sarah K.
Ballerini, Tosca
Gifford, Dian J.
Brodeur, Richard D.
Hofmann, Eileen E.
spellingShingle Ruzicka, James J.
Steele, John H.
Gaichas, Sarah K.
Ballerini, Tosca
Gifford, Dian J.
Brodeur, Richard D.
Hofmann, Eileen E.
Analysis of Energy Flow in US GLOBEC Ecosystems Using End-to-End Models
author_facet Ruzicka, James J.
Steele, John H.
Gaichas, Sarah K.
Ballerini, Tosca
Gifford, Dian J.
Brodeur, Richard D.
Hofmann, Eileen E.
author_sort Ruzicka, James J.
title Analysis of Energy Flow in US GLOBEC Ecosystems Using End-to-End Models
title_short Analysis of Energy Flow in US GLOBEC Ecosystems Using End-to-End Models
title_full Analysis of Energy Flow in US GLOBEC Ecosystems Using End-to-End Models
title_fullStr Analysis of Energy Flow in US GLOBEC Ecosystems Using End-to-End Models
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of Energy Flow in US GLOBEC Ecosystems Using End-to-End Models
title_sort analysis of energy flow in us globec ecosystems using end-to-end models
publisher Oceanography Society
url https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/cf95jd18k
genre Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Alaska
genre_facet Antarc*
Antarctic
Antarctic Peninsula
Alaska
op_relation https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/cf95jd18k
op_rights Copyright Not Evaluated
_version_ 1810495600732405760