A rapid method for landscape assessment of carbon storage and ecosystem function in moss and lichen ground layers

Mat-forming “ground layers” of mosses and lichens often have functional impacts disproportionate to their biomass, and are responsible for sequestering one-third of the world's terrestrial carbon as they regulate water tables, cool soils and inhibit microbial decomposition. Without reliable ass...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Smith, Robert J., Benavides, Juan C., Jovan, Sarah, Amacher, Michael, McCune, Bruce
Format: Article in Journal/Newspaper
Language:English
unknown
Published: American Bryological and Lichenological Society
Subjects:
Online Access:https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/bv73c227x
id ftoregonstate:ir.library.oregonstate.edu:bv73c227x
record_format openpolar
spelling ftoregonstate:ir.library.oregonstate.edu:bv73c227x 2024-04-14T08:08:31+00:00 A rapid method for landscape assessment of carbon storage and ecosystem function in moss and lichen ground layers Smith, Robert J. Benavides, Juan C. Jovan, Sarah Amacher, Michael McCune, Bruce https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/bv73c227x English [eng] eng unknown American Bryological and Lichenological Society https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/bv73c227x Copyright Not Evaluated Article ftoregonstate 2024-03-21T15:42:56Z Mat-forming “ground layers” of mosses and lichens often have functional impacts disproportionate to their biomass, and are responsible for sequestering one-third of the world's terrestrial carbon as they regulate water tables, cool soils and inhibit microbial decomposition. Without reliable assessment tools, the potential effects of climate and land use changes on these functions remain unclear; therefore, we implemented a novel “Ground Layer Indicator” method as part of the U.S.D.A. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program. Non-destructive depth and cover measurements were used to estimate biomass, carbon and nitrogen content for nine moss and lichen functional groups among eight contrasted habitat types in Pacific Northwest and subarctic U.S.A. (N = 81 sites). Ground layer cover, volume, standing biomass, carbon content and functional group richness were greater in boreal forest and tundra habitats of Alaska compared to Oregon forest and steppe. Biomass of up to 22769 ± 2707 kg ha⁻¹ (mean ± SE) in upland Picea mariana forests was nearly double other reports, likely because our method included viable, non-photosynthetic tissues. Functional group richness, which did not directly correspond with biomass, was greatest in lowland Picea mariana forests (7.1 ± 0.4 functional groups per site). Bootstrap resampling revealed that thirty-two microplots per site were adequate for meeting data quality objectives. Here we present a non-destructive, repeatable and efficient method (sampling time: ca. 60 min per site) for gauging ground layer functions and evaluating responses to ecosystem changes. High biomass and functional distinctiveness in Alaskan ground layers highlight the need for increased attention to currently under-sampled boreal and arctic regions, which are projected to be among the most active responders to climate change. Keywords: ecosystem functions, carbon sequestration and cycling, boreal forests, soil nutrient cycles, Forest Inventory and Analysis program, land-use change, climate change, bryophyte ... Article in Journal/Newspaper Arctic Climate change Subarctic Tundra Alaska ScholarsArchive@OSU (Oregon State University) Arctic Pacific
institution Open Polar
collection ScholarsArchive@OSU (Oregon State University)
op_collection_id ftoregonstate
language English
unknown
description Mat-forming “ground layers” of mosses and lichens often have functional impacts disproportionate to their biomass, and are responsible for sequestering one-third of the world's terrestrial carbon as they regulate water tables, cool soils and inhibit microbial decomposition. Without reliable assessment tools, the potential effects of climate and land use changes on these functions remain unclear; therefore, we implemented a novel “Ground Layer Indicator” method as part of the U.S.D.A. Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program. Non-destructive depth and cover measurements were used to estimate biomass, carbon and nitrogen content for nine moss and lichen functional groups among eight contrasted habitat types in Pacific Northwest and subarctic U.S.A. (N = 81 sites). Ground layer cover, volume, standing biomass, carbon content and functional group richness were greater in boreal forest and tundra habitats of Alaska compared to Oregon forest and steppe. Biomass of up to 22769 ± 2707 kg ha⁻¹ (mean ± SE) in upland Picea mariana forests was nearly double other reports, likely because our method included viable, non-photosynthetic tissues. Functional group richness, which did not directly correspond with biomass, was greatest in lowland Picea mariana forests (7.1 ± 0.4 functional groups per site). Bootstrap resampling revealed that thirty-two microplots per site were adequate for meeting data quality objectives. Here we present a non-destructive, repeatable and efficient method (sampling time: ca. 60 min per site) for gauging ground layer functions and evaluating responses to ecosystem changes. High biomass and functional distinctiveness in Alaskan ground layers highlight the need for increased attention to currently under-sampled boreal and arctic regions, which are projected to be among the most active responders to climate change. Keywords: ecosystem functions, carbon sequestration and cycling, boreal forests, soil nutrient cycles, Forest Inventory and Analysis program, land-use change, climate change, bryophyte ...
format Article in Journal/Newspaper
author Smith, Robert J.
Benavides, Juan C.
Jovan, Sarah
Amacher, Michael
McCune, Bruce
spellingShingle Smith, Robert J.
Benavides, Juan C.
Jovan, Sarah
Amacher, Michael
McCune, Bruce
A rapid method for landscape assessment of carbon storage and ecosystem function in moss and lichen ground layers
author_facet Smith, Robert J.
Benavides, Juan C.
Jovan, Sarah
Amacher, Michael
McCune, Bruce
author_sort Smith, Robert J.
title A rapid method for landscape assessment of carbon storage and ecosystem function in moss and lichen ground layers
title_short A rapid method for landscape assessment of carbon storage and ecosystem function in moss and lichen ground layers
title_full A rapid method for landscape assessment of carbon storage and ecosystem function in moss and lichen ground layers
title_fullStr A rapid method for landscape assessment of carbon storage and ecosystem function in moss and lichen ground layers
title_full_unstemmed A rapid method for landscape assessment of carbon storage and ecosystem function in moss and lichen ground layers
title_sort rapid method for landscape assessment of carbon storage and ecosystem function in moss and lichen ground layers
publisher American Bryological and Lichenological Society
url https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/bv73c227x
geographic Arctic
Pacific
geographic_facet Arctic
Pacific
genre Arctic
Climate change
Subarctic
Tundra
Alaska
genre_facet Arctic
Climate change
Subarctic
Tundra
Alaska
op_relation https://ir.library.oregonstate.edu/concern/articles/bv73c227x
op_rights Copyright Not Evaluated
_version_ 1796305952337559552